Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 73 Issue: 4

Comparative analysis of animal welfare regulations in the EU and Türkiye

Ayşe Arat(Akdeniz University, Faculty of Law, Department of Roman Law)0000-0001-8261-4302
Kürşat Ersöz(Akdeniz University, Faculty of Law, Department of Administration Law)0000-0002-0167-6876
Mustafa Garip(SELCUK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, VETERINARY MEDICINE PR.)0000-0002-1429-2724
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study concludes that, although Turkish legal texts are not significantly behind global standards, their implementation faces serious challenges owing to insufficiently deterrent penalties, weak enforcement, and limited public awareness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Animal welfare is based on the "Five Freedoms" principle, which is internationally applied to safeguard the physical and mental well-being of animals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Today, the European Union continues to advance these standards through strategies such as "From Farm to Fork" and "Ending the Cage Age." In Türkiye, however, animal welfare is addressed primarily under Law No. 5199, which focuses on protecting animals, and Law No. 5996, which focuses on food and production.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concludes that, although Turkish legal texts are not significantly behind global standards, their implementation faces serious challenges owing to insufficiently deterrent penalties, weak enforcement, and limited public awareness.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Animal Law · Animal Welfare · Five freedoms

Abstract

Animal welfare is based on the "Five Freedoms" principle, which is internationally applied to safeguard the physical and mental well-being of animals. Under European Union legislation, animals are recognized not merely as objects but as "sentient beings"; farming, transport, and slaughter processes are subject to strict welfare standards. Within this framework, the EU has established a comprehensive body of legislation defining species-specific housing, transport, and slaughter standards for animals such as laying hens, calves, and pigs. Today, the European Union continues to advance these standards through strategies such as "From Farm to Fork" and "Ending the Cage Age." In Türkiye, however, animal welfare is addressed primarily under Law No. 5199, which focuses on protecting animals, and Law No. 5996, which focuses on food and production. However, the human-centered rules introduced by Law No. 7527 in 2024 regarding the collection and sheltering of stray animals have been criticized for their lack of feasibility, particularly given the administrative and financial limitations of municipalities. When comparing the two legal systems, it is evident that regulations in Türkiye, such as the “Regulation on the Welfare of Farm Animals,” are consistent with the EU’s core directives. However, the most notable differences include the absence of detailed and stringent species-specific sub-standards in Turkish legislation, discrepancies in pre-slaughter stunning regulations, and the long transition periods (extended until 2026) granted for practices such as the mandatory use of GPS in transport vehicles. The study concludes that, although Turkish legal texts are not significantly behind global standards, their implementation faces serious challenges owing to insufficiently deterrent penalties, weak enforcement, and limited public awareness.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arat, A., Ersöz, K., Garip, M. (2026). Comparative analysis of animal welfare regulations in the EU and Türkiye. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 73 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.1920122

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Ahmet A (2007): Animal welfare practices in the European Union and Turkey. EU Expert thesis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the Republic of Turkey, Directorate General for Foreign Relations and EU Coordination, Ankara. Available at https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/ABDGM/Belgeler/İDARİ%20İŞLER/uzmanlık%20Tezleri/AhmetAntalyali.pdf. (Accessed March 24, 2026).
  2. Bousfield B, Brown R (2010): Animal welfare. Vet Bull, 1, 1-12.
  3. Carenzi C, Verga M (2009): Animal welfare: Review of the scientific concept and definition. Ital J Anim Sci, 8, 21-30.
  4. Çankaya H, Ekiz C, Şahin N (2024): Animal protection policy in Turkey. Fiscaoeconomia, 8, 825-861. DOI: 10.25295/fsecon.1434116.
  5. Demirel AF, Çak B (2016): The importance of animal welfare practices in food safety in terms of relevant legislation in Turkey and the European Union. Van Vet J, 27, 111-116.
  6. Duru B (2023): Hayvan Hakları Teorisi ve Pozitif Hukuk İncelemesi. Oniki Levha Publishing, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  7. Ertaş Ş (2012): Çevre Hukuku ve Hayvan Hakları Hukuku. İleri Publishing, İzmir, Türkiye.
  8. European Commission (2026a): European Union law. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/. (Accessed January 20, 2026).
  9. European Commission (2026b): Treaty on the functioning of the EU. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUri Serv/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT:en:PDF. (Accessed March 30, 2026).
  10. European Commission (2026c): Commission staff working document, evaluation of the European Union strategy for the protection and welfare of animals 2012-2015. Council Directive 98/58/EC of July 20, 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes (OJ L 221, August 8, 1998, 23-27). Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri= CELEX:52021SC0076&qid=1776242085440&rid=1 and https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1998/58/EC. (Accessed March 30, 2026).
  11. European Commission (2026d): Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2005/1/oj/eng. (Accessed March 30, 2026).
  12. European Commission (2026e): Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing (Text with EEA relevance). Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1099/oj/eng. (Accessed March 30, 2026).
  13. European Commission (2026f): Animal welfare. Available at https://food.ec.europa.eu/animals/animal-welfare/. (Accessed March 30, 2026).
  14. Fidan ED (2012): Animal welfare practices concerning farm animals in Turkey. Aduveterinary, 1, 39-46.
  15. Francione GL (1995): Animal rights and animal welfare. Rutgers Law Rev, 48, 397-469.
  16. Fraser D (2008): Understanding animal welfare. Acta Vet Scand, 50, S1. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1.
  17. Gökhan A, Aşkın Y (2010): A general assessment of the legal status of farm animal welfare in the European Union and Turkey. Vet Hekim Der Derg, 10, 84-92.
  18. Gümüş E, Çınar H (2016): Comparison of beef sectors of Turkey, United States and European Union and evaluation in terms of foreign trade. Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg, 5, 177-183.
  19. Keeling L, Rushen J, Duncan I (2018): Understanding Animal Welfare. In: MC Appleby, AS Olsson, F Galindo (Eds), Animal Welfare. CABI, Boston, USA.
  20. Kilic İ, Bozkurt Z (2020): Assessment of Turkish consumer attitudes using an Animal Welfare Attitude Scale (AWAS). Vet Méx, 7, 11-15. Koçhisarlıoğlu C, Erişgin SÖ (2013): The legal status of animals. Yaşar Univ E J, 8, 1691-1723.
  21. Koknaroglu H, Akunal T (2013): Animal welfare: An animal science approach. Meat Sci, 95, 821-827. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.030.
  22. McGlone JJ (1993): What is animal welfare? J Agric Environ Ethics, 6, 26-36.
  23. Mellor DJ, Patterson-Kane E, Stafford KJ (2009): The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  24. Mellor DJ (2016): Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living”. Animals, 6, 1-21. DOI: 10.3390 /ani6030021.
  25. Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Özbeyaz C (2024): Laboratuvar Hayvanlarında İlaç Kullanımı. Türkiye Klinikleri, Ankara, Türkiye.
  26. Palmer C, Sandøe P (2018): Animal ethics. 1-12. In: MC Appleby, A Olsson, F Galindo (Eds), Animal Welfare. CABI, Boston, USA.
  27. Reimert LE, Webb MA, van Marwijk JE, et al (2023): Towards an integrated concept of animal welfare. Animal, 17, 100838. DOI:10.1016/j.animal.2023.100838.
  28. Sert H, Uzmay A (2017): An evaluation of animal welfare practices worldwide from economic and sustainability perspectives. Adnan Menderes Univ J Inst Soc Sci, 4, 263-276. DOI: 10.30803/adusobed.353373.
  29. Uyumaz A (2016): Animal rights in Turkey in light of current developments as a legal problem. Gazi Univ Law Fac J, 10, 133-184.
  30. Yeates JW (2024): Animal behaviour and welfare research: A One Health perspective. Res Ethics, 20, 411-432. DOI:10.1177/17470161241236941.