Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 73 Issue: 4

Effects of increased dietary sugar and reduced rumen-undegradable protein during the transition period on production, metabolic, and immune parameters in dairy cows

Cangir Uyarlar(AFYON KOCATEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7803-2454
Ayşe Özcan(Mir Poultry, Livestock, Agriculture, Food, Construction, Trade and Industry Limited Company)0009-0008-8773-7844
İsmail Bayram(AFYON KOCATEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5090-7474
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, increasing dietary sugar and reducing rumen-undegradable protein during the transition period improved indicators of energy metabolism, enhanced immune status, promoted feed intake, and increased milk fat content.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Optimizing carbohydrate and protein fractions in transition dairy cow diets is critical for maintaining rumen function, health, and productivity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although rations should be rich in starch and undegraded protein for high-yielding cows, this study examined the effects of reducing dietary starch and rumen-undegradable protein while increasing sugar and rumen-degradable protein (isocaloric and isonitrogenous) on milk yield, milk composition, and selected blood metabolic and immune parameters in transition dairy cows.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, increasing dietary sugar and reducing rumen-undegradable protein during the transition period improved indicators of energy metabolism, enhanced immune status, promoted feed intake, and increased milk fat content.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dairy cows · Rumen-undegradable protein · Sugar

Abstract

Optimizing carbohydrate and protein fractions in transition dairy cow diets is critical for maintaining rumen function, health, and productivity. Although rations should be rich in starch and undegraded protein for high-yielding cows, this study examined the effects of reducing dietary starch and rumen-undegradable protein while increasing sugar and rumen-degradable protein (isocaloric and isonitrogenous) on milk yield, milk composition, and selected blood metabolic and immune parameters in transition dairy cows. Forty Holstein dairy cows, approximately 210 days pregnant, were divided into two groups, each consisting of 20 cows. The control (C) group was fed a standard ration, while the animals in the treatment group (T) were fed a ration containing reduced bypass protein content and increased sugar content. Weekly blood samples were collected throughout the study period. Following parturition, milk yield and milk composition were monitored regularly. In addition, feed intake was recorded and monitored during the study. Blood glucose concentration increased in the treatment group during the prepartum, parturition, and postpartum periods (P=0.0266, P=0.0307, P=0.0089). While IgG levels increased throughout the study (P<0.0001), NEFA levels decreased during the parturition and postpartum period. Additionally, Blood ürea nitrogen (BUN) levels decreased after parturition (P=0.0421). Milk yield was similar between the treatment and control groups. Postpartum feed consumption (P=0.0011) and milk fat (P=0.0017) were higher in the treatment group. In conclusion, increasing dietary sugar and reducing rumen-undegradable protein during the transition period improved indicators of energy metabolism, enhanced immune status, promoted feed intake, and increased milk fat content. This nutritional strategy may support metabolic health and productive performance in transition dairy cows.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uyarlar, C., Özcan, A., Bayram, İ. (2026). Effects of increased dietary sugar and reduced rumen-undegradable protein during the transition period on production, metabolic, and immune parameters in dairy cows. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 73 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.1833033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. AOAC (1990): Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed, Washington DC.
  2. Berry DP, Friggens NC, Lucy M, et al (2016): Milk production and fertility in cattle. Annu Rev Anim Biosci, 4, 269–290. DOI: 10.1146/ANNUREV-ANIMAL-021815-111406
  3. Broderick GA, Luchini ND, Reynal SM, et al (2008): Effect on production of replacing dietary starch with sucrose in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 91, 4801–4810.
  4. Broderick GA, Radloff WJ (2004): Effect of molasses supplementation on the production of lactating dairy cows fed diets based on alfalfa and corn silage. J Dairy Sci, 87, 2997–3009.
  5. Calsamiglia S, Cardozo PW, Ferret A, et al (2008): Changes in rumen microbial fermentation are due to a combined effect of type of diet and pH. J Anim Sci, 86, 702-711. DOI: 10.2527/JAS.2007-0146
  6. Cardoso FC, Kalscheur F, Drackley JK (2020): Nutrition strategies for ımproved health, production, and fertility during the transition period. J Dairy Sci, 103, 5684–5693. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.2019-17271
  7. Cotta MA (1992): Interaction of ruminal bacteria in the production and utilization of maltooligosaccharides from starch. Applied Environ Microbiol, 58, 48-54. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.58.1.48-54.1992
  8. DeGaris P, Lean IJ (2008): Milk fever in dairy cows: A review of pathophysiology and control principles. Vet J Lond Engl, 176, 58–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.029
  9. Dhakal R, Neves ALA, Sapkota R, et al (2024): Temporal dynamics of volatile fatty acids profile, methane production, and prokaryotic community in an in vitro rumen fermentation system fed with maize silage. Front Microbiol, 15, 1271599. DOI: 10.3389/FMICB.2024.1271599/TEXT
  10. Firkins JL, Oldick BS, Pantoja J, et al (2008): Efficacy of liquid feeds varying in concentration and composition of fat, nonprotein nitrogen, and nonfiber carbohydrates for lactating cows. J Dairy Sci, 91,1969–1984. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.2007-0868
  11. Grummer RR (1995): Impact of changes in organic nutrient metabolism on feeding the transition dairy cow. J Anim Sci, 73, 2820–2833. DOI: 10.2527/1995.7392820X
  12. Hall MB, Mertens DR (2017): A 100-year review: Carbohydrates—characterization, digestion, and utilization. J Dairy Sci, 100, 10078–10093. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13311
  13. Havekes CD, Duffield TF, Carpenter AJ, et al (2020): Effects of molasses-based liquid feed supplementation to a high-straw dry cow diet on feed intake, health, and performance of dairy cows across the transition period. J Dairy Sci, 103, 5070-5089. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.2019-18085
  14. JMP (2003). Version 5.0.1.2, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  15. Kristensen NB (2005): Splanchnic metabolism of volatile fatty acids in the dairy cow. Anim Sci, 80, 3-10. DOI: 10.1079/ASC41250003
  16. Litherland NB, da Silva DNL, Hansen WP, et al (2013): Effects of prepartum controlled-energy wheat straw and grass hay diets supplemented with starch or sugar on periparturient dairy cow performance and lipid metabolism. J Dairy Sci, 96, 3050-3063. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.2012-5998
  17. Mann S, Yepes FAL, Overton TR, et al (2015): Dry period plane of energy: Effects on feed ıntake, energy balance, milk production, and composition in transition dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 98, 3366–3382. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.2014-9024
  18. McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD (2010): Animal Nutrition. 7 th ed. Prentice Hall, Pearson, Toronto.
  19. Miller WF, Titgemeyer EC, Nagaraja TG, et al (2021): Influence of cane molasses inclusion to dairy cow diets during the transition period on rumen epithelial development. Animals, 11, 1230. DOI: 10.3390/ANI11051230/S1
  20. Moallem U, Rosov A, Honig H, et al (2016): Molasses-based supplement improved the metabolic status of late-pregnant ewes bearing multiple fetuses. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 219, 83–93. DOI: 10.1016/J.ANIFEEDSCI. 2016.06.002
  21. National Research Council (2001): Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
  22. Nocek JE, Tamminga S (1991): Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. J Dairy Sci, 74, 3598-629. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(91)78552-4
  23. Nombekela SW, Murphy MR (1995): Sucrose supplementation and feed intake of dairy cows in early lactation. J Dairy Sci, 78, 880–885
  24. Oba M, Kammes-Main K (2023): Effects of carbohydrate digestion on feed intake and fuel supply. J Dairy Sci, 106, 2153–2160. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.2022-22420
  25. Penner GB, Oba M (2009): Increasing dietary sugar concentration may improve dry matter intake, ruminal fermentation, and productivity of dairy cows in the postpartum phase of the transition period. J Dairy Sci, 92, 3341-3353. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.2008-1977
  26. Piwonka EJ, Firkins JL (1996): Effect of glucose fermentation on fiber digestion by ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J Dairy Sci, 79, 2196-2206. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(96)76596-7
  27. Rabelo E Rezende RL, Bertics SJ, et al (2005): Effects of pre-and postfresh transition diets varying in dietary energy density on metabolic status of periparturient dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 88, 4375–4383. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(05)73124-6
  28. Rosmalia A, Permana IG, Despal D (2022): Synchronization of rumen degradable protein with non-fiber carbohydrate on microbial protein synthesis and dairy ration digestibility. Vet World, 15, 252–261. DOI: 10.14202/VETWORLD.2022.252-261
  29. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991): Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci, 74, 3583-97. DOI: 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(91)78551-2