Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 1997 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

Odontoid fractures

Odontoid kemiğin travmatik kırıkları ve tedavi prensipleri

Pages
113–116
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Posterior fusion was performed and in the pos¬toperative period significant improvement in their neurologic status was observed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this report, 36 cases of odontoid fractures have been reported. 24 of them , who had type 2 odontoid fractures have been operated via posterior cervical approach and their preoperative neurologi¬cal states, operative criteria and outcome in the pos¬toperative period have been reviewed. 6 cases with type 3 odontoid fractures and 6 cases who had type 2 fractures with anterior dislocation below 6 mm. had been treated non surgically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The other cases we¬re operated as soon as their general condition beca¬me suitable for an operation under general anesthe¬sia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Posterior fusion was performed and in the pos¬toperative period significant improvement in their neurologic status was observed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this report, 36 cases of odontoid fractures have been reported. 24 of them , who had type 2 odontoid fractures have been operated via posterior cervical approach and their preoperative neurologi¬cal states, operative criteria and outcome in the pos¬toperative period have been reviewed. 6 cases with type 3 odontoid fractures and 6 cases who had type 2 fractures with anterior dislocation below 6 mm. had been treated non surgically. The other cases we¬re operated as soon as their general condition beca¬me suitable for an operation under general anesthe¬sia. Posterior fusion was performed and in the pos¬toperative period significant improvement in their neurologic status was observed.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Ankara İniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Nöroşirurji Anabilim Dalında'1972- 1995 yılları ara¬sında odontoid fraktörü nedeniyle tedavi gören 36 olgu incelenmiştir. Tip 2 odontoid kırığı olan 24 ol¬gu durumları operasyon için uygun hale gelince öpere edilerek posterior füzyon yapılmış ve postope¬ratif dönemde nörolojik durumlarında belirgin dü¬zelme gözlenmiştir. Tip 3 kırığı olan 6 olgu ve tip 2 kırığı olup anterior dislokasyonu 6 mm. altında olan 6 olguda ise ekstemal servikal spine stabilizasyon yöntemleri ile stabilizasyon sağlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATTAR, A., ÇAĞLAR, Ş., EGEMEN, N., ARASIL, E., TEMİZ, C., DEDA, H., ERDOĞAN, A., SİLAV, G. (2022). Odontoid fractures. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 113–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/444297

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Gökalp HZ, Avman N, Araşıl E, Kanpolat Y, Erdoğan A, Naderi S, Balım T, Servikal travmalarda tutum- 201 servikal travmalı hastanın klinik analizi. Türk Nöroşi-rürji Dergisi. 1989; Eki; 77- 82
  2. Hadley MN, Carol BRN, Sonntag VKH, Axis fractures. Acomprehensive revievv of management and treat-rrıent in 107 cases. Neurosurg. 1985; 17; 281- 290
  3. Charles RC, Augustus A, Fractures of the dens. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1 985; 58; 1341 - 1 348
  4. Bohler J, Fracture of the odontoid process. J. Trauma. 1965; 5; 386- 390
  5. Dunn ME, Seljeskog EL, Experience in the management of odontoid process injuries: An analysis of 128 cases. Neurosurg. 1986; 18; 306- 310
  6. Thomeier VVC, Brovvn CD, Mirvis ES, The laterally tilted dens: A sign of subtle odontoid fracture on plain ra-diography. AJNR. 1 990;11; 605- 668
  7. Apuzzo MCJ et al, Acute fractures of the odontoid pro-cess. An analysis of forty five cases. J. Neurosurg. 1978; 48; 85-91
  8. Mc Lourin RL, Vernal R, Treatment of fractures of the at-las and axis by vviring vvithout fusion. J. Neurosurg. 1973; 36; 773- 780
  9. Mortel, VVİlliam and Page JW, Cervical vertebral erosions and subluxations in rheumotoid arthritis and ankylo-sing spondylitis. Arthrit and Rheum. 1960; 3; 546-556
  10. Paradis GR, Janes JM, Posttraumatic atlanto-axial insta-bility; The fate of the odontoid process fracture in 46 cases. J.Trauma. 1973; 1 3; 359- 367
  11. Sonntag VKH, Hadley MN, Non- operative management of cervical spine injuries. Clin. Neurosurg. 1987; 34; 630- 649
  12. Anderson LD, DıAlanzo RT, fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1974; 56A; 1663- 1674
  13. Gartman J, Bullit E, Baker LH, Axis fractures in ankylo-sing spondylitis: Case report. Neurosurg. 1991; 29; 590- 594
  14. Schiff DCM, Parke WW, The arterial supply of the odon-toid process. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1973; 55A; 1450- 1456
  15. Ehara S, El-Khoury YG, Clark RC, Radiologic evaluation of dens fracture, Spine, 1992,17,475-479 16. Nevvman P, Svveetram R, Occipito-cervical fusion. An operative technique and its indication. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1 968; 61 B; 423- 431
  16. Fried LC, Atlanto-axial dislocation fractures. Failure of posterior C1 to C2 fusion. J Bone and Joint Surgery. 1973; 55B(3); 490- 496
  17. Eismont FJ, Boblman HH, Posterior atlanto- occipital dislocation vvith fractures of the atlas and odontoid process. Report of a case and survival. j. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1978; 60A; 397- 399
  18. Brooks AL, Jenkins ER, Atl