Journals / Anadolu Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Determination of abdominal aortic diameter in adults living in the region of Şanlıurfa

Şanlıurfa ve yöresinde yaşayan erişkinlerde abdominal aort çapının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
183–186
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussing the results, we have concluded that a measurement of a population is not sufficient to estimate of correct aortic diameters of the other populations and similar screening measurements are required in other populations too.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms is variable in different regions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Making definitive diagnosis of the disease, screening tests of aortic diameter is required in different regions, in the present study, we have aimed to determine abdominal aortic diameter of living adults in the region of Şanlıurfa and for this purpose, we have used abdominal computed tomography of 297 patients who applied to radiological clinic of the Harran University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussing the results, we have concluded that a measurement of a population is not sufficient to estimate of correct aortic diameters of the other populations and similar screening measurements are required in other populations too.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms is variable in different regions. Making definitive diagnosis of the disease, screening tests of aortic diameter is required in different regions, in the present study, we have aimed to determine abdominal aortic diameter of living adults in the region of Şanlıurfa and for this purpose, we have used abdominal computed tomography of 297 patients who applied to radiological clinic of the Harran University. Abdominal aortic diameters were ranged between 11 to 29 milimeters (mean 18.0 ± 3.6 mm). They were ranged between 11 to 26 mm (mean 17.3 ± 3.2 mm) among the women while ranging between 11 to 29 (mean 18.8 ± 3.8 mm) among men. Discussing the results, we have concluded that a measurement of a population is not sufficient to estimate of correct aortic diameters of the other populations and similar screening measurements are required in other populations too.

Özet

Abdominal aort anevrizmasının toplumlardaki görülme oranı değişkendir ve bu oran değişik insan gruplarında farklılık göstermektedir. Bu hastalığın gerçek anlamda tanısının konulabilmesi için, her toplumdaki normal aort çapının tarama testleri ile belirlenmesi gereklidir. Bu çalışmada biz, Harran Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı'nda değişik amaçlarla bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) ile batın değerlendirmesi yapılan 297 hastanın (155 kadın, 142 erkek) abdominal aorta çaplarını ölçtük ve bu şekilde hastanemize başvuran yetişkin bölge insanının normal değerlerini ortaya koymayı amaçladık. Hastaların ortalama aort çapları 11 - 29 mm arasında (18.0 ± 3.6 mm) olup, bu değer kadınlarda 11 - 26 mm (17.3 ± 3.2 mm), erkeklerde de 11 - 29 mm (18.8 ± 3.8 mm) arasındaydı. Sonuçlarımızı değerlendirdiğimiz zaman, bir bölgede yapılan çalışmanın, diğer bölge insanlarının durumu hakkında yeterli önbilgiyi veremeyeceğini, bu nedenle de benzer çalışmaların farklı bölge insanlarında ayrı ayrı yapılması gerektiğini düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUNT, A. S., ÖZTÜRK, A., ANDAÇ, M. H., DARÇIN, O. T. (2022). Determination of abdominal aortic diameter in adults living in the region of Şanlıurfa. Anadolu Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 183–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/438116

References (1)

  1. Behgtsson H, Bergqvist D, Stenby NH. Increasing prevalance of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Surg 1992; 158:19-23. 2-Brivady A, Normand B, Fabry R, et al. Prospective study by ultrasonography of abdominal aortic diameter in atherosclerosis of the lower limbs: the role of atheromatous disease. Vasc Surg 1997;31:51-65. 3-Brown PM, Zelt DT, Sobolev B. The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: The impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:280. 4-Cronenwett JL, Krupski WC, Rutherford RB. Abdominal aortic and iliac aneurysms. In: Rutherford RB, ed. Vascular Surgery 5th edition. Philadelphia:WB Saunders Co, 2000; 1246-1280. 5-Da Silva ES, Rodrigues AJ Jr, De Tolosa EMC, et al. Variation of infrarenal aortic diameter: A necropsy study. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:920-7. 6-Hartnell GG. Imaging of aortic aneurysms and dissection: CT and MRI. J Thorac Imag 2001;16:35-46. 7-Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al. Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:945-52. 8-Liddington MI, Heather BP. The relationship between aortic diameter and body habits. Eur J Vasc Surg 1992;6:89-92. 9-Pleumeekers HJ, Hoes AW, Mulder PG, et al. Differences in observer variability of ultrasound measurements of the proximal and distal abdominal aorta. J Med Screen 1998;5(2): 104-8. 10-Rubin GD, Paik DS,Johnston PC, et al. Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT. Radiology 1998; 206:823-9. 11-Sarıosmanoğlu N, Uğurlu B, Karaçelik M, et al. Ülkemizde abdominal aorta çaplarının yaş ve cinse göre değişimi: çok merkezli bir çalışma. Damar Cer Derg 2002; 1:1-6. 12-Wilson KA,Lee AJ,Lee AJ, et al. The relationship between aortic wall distensibility and rupture of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:112-7.