Journals / Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Tuzlu kosullarda havuç (Daucus carota L.) verım ve kalıtesi

Carrot (Daucus carota L.): yield and quality under saline conditions

Pages
51–56
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Increasing irrigation water salinities did not significantly affect unit weight, color index, height and penetration resistance of fruit, water consumption, leaf Ca and Mg contents but fruit quality such as flavor and dry matter content improved due to salinity, however 50% yield loss occurred even below at 2.5 dS $m^ {-1}$ soil salinity level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effects of 6 irrigation salinity levels on yield and quality, vegetative growth, water consumption and ion accumulation of carrot (Daucus carota L.) were studied under greenhouse condition in Tokat/Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiment was conducted as a randomized block design with 5 replications using a total of 30 pots.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Increasing irrigation water salinities did not significantly affect unit weight, color index, height and penetration resistance of fruit, water consumption, leaf Ca and Mg contents but fruit quality such as flavor and dry matter content improved due to salinity, however 50% yield loss occurred even below at 2.5 dS $m^ {-1}$ soil salinity level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The effects of 6 irrigation salinity levels on yield and quality, vegetative growth, water consumption and ion accumulation of carrot (Daucus carota L.) were studied under greenhouse condition in Tokat/Turkey. The experiment was conducted as a randomized block design with 5 replications using a total of 30 pots. The synthetic saline waters were prepared by adding Ca$CI _ 2$, Mg$SO _ 4$ and NaCl salts to tap water. Tap water (ECi= 0.75 dS.$m^ {-1}$) was applied as a control treatment. Irrigation water salinity ($T _ 0$= 0.75, $T _ 1$= 1.5, $T _ 2$= 2.5, $T _ 3$= 3.5, $T _ 4$= 5.0 and $T _ 5$= 7.0 dS $m^ {-1}$ ) led to increase in soil salinity, carrot flavor, leaf Cl and Na content and decrease in fruit yield, fruit diameter, water use efficiency and leaf K content. Increasing irrigation water salinities did not significantly affect unit weight, color index, height and penetration resistance of fruit, water consumption, leaf Ca and Mg contents but fruit quality such as flavor and dry matter content improved due to salinity, however 50% yield loss occurred even below at 2.5 dS $m^ {-1}$ soil salinity level.

Özet

Bu çalısmada Tokat ilinde, sera kosullarında, 6 farklı tuzluluk düzeyindeki sulama sularının havuçta verim, kalite, vejatatif gelisme, su tüketimi ve mineral madde alımı arastırılmıstır. Çalısma tesadüf bloklarında 5 tekerrürlü olarak toplam 30 saksıda yürütülmüstür. Tuzlu sulama suları Ca$CI _ 2$, Mg$SO _ 4$ ve NaCl tuzlarının sehir sebeke suyuna karıstırılmasıyla elde edilmistir. Sehir sebeke suyu (ECi= 0.75 dS.$m^ {-1}$) aynı zamanda kontrol konusu olarak kullanılmıstır. Sulama sularının tuz içeriğinin artması ($T _ 0$= 0.75, $T _ 1$= 1.5, $T _ 2$= 2.5, $T _ 3$= 3.5, $T _ 4$= 5.0 ve $T _ 5$= 7.0 dS $m^ {-1}$), toprak tuzluluğunun, meyve tadının, yaprakta Cl ve Na miktarının artmasına yol açarken, meyve çapının, su kullanım etkinliğinin ve yaprakta K miktarının azalmasına neden olmustur. Artan sulama suyu tuzlulukları, meyve birim ağırlığını, rengini, boyunu, sertliğini, bitki su tüketimini, yaprakta Ca ve Mg miktarını istatistiksel olarak etkilememis ancak meyve tadını, kuru madde miktarını artmıs, fakat 2.5 dS $m^ {-1}$ toprak tuzluluğu verimde yaklasık %50 azalmaya neden olmustur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, A., ÜNLÜKARA, A., KESMEZ, D., CEMEK, B. (2022). Tuzlu kosullarda havuç (Daucus carota L.) verım ve kalıtesi. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 51–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/438007

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ayars, J. E., Hutmacher, R.B., Schoneman, R.A. Vail, S.S., and Pfaum T., 1993. Long term use of saline water for irrigation. Irri. Sci. 14:27-34.
  2. Berstein L., Ayers A. D., 1953. Salt tolerance of five varieties of carrots. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 61: 360-366. De Pascale,S., and Barbieri, G., 2000. Yield and Quality of Carrot as Affected by Soil Salinity from Long-Term Irrigation with Saline Water. Proc. 3rd on Irrigation Hort. Crops, eds. Ferreira & Jones, Acta Hort. 537. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (eds) (1986) Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33, Rome. Garcia-Sanchez F, Carvajal M, Porras I, Botia P, Martinez V, 2003. Effects of salinity and rate of irrigation on yield, fruit quality and mineral composition of ‘Fino 49’ lemon. Europ. J. Agronomy 19: 427-437.
  3. Gibberd, M.R., Turner N.C. and Storey, R. 2002. Influence of saline irrigation on growth, ion accumulation and partitioning, and leaf gas exchange of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Annals of Botany 90:715-724.
  4. Grieve, C. M., and Suarez, D.L., 1997. Purslane: A halophytic crop for drainage water reuse systems. Plant Soil 192:227-283. Imperial Valley study. I. Hypothesis, experimental procedures and cropping results, Hilgardia 56:1-16.
  5. Jensen M.E., Burman R.D., (Ed.) and Allen R.G. 1989. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manual Rep. Eng. Pract. No: 70, NY. Kadayıfçı, A., Tuylu İ. G., ve Uçar, Y. 2004. Sulama Suyu Tuzluluğunun Soğan Bitkisinin Yumru Verimi, Bitki Su Tüketimi ve Toprak Profili Üzerine Etkileri. TARIM BILIMLERI DERGISI 2004, (10-1) 45-49.
  6. Khan, S., Tariq, F., Yuanlai, C., and Blackwell J., 2006. Can irrigation be sustainable?. Agricultural Water Management, Volume 80, Issues 1-3, 24 February 2006, Pages 87-99
  7. Hardly, D., 2008. Effect of fertilizer salts on soil pH. Soil Testing Section Chief. NCDA&CS Agronomic Division. January. Lambert R.S. and DuBois R.J., 1971. Specrophotometric determination of nitrate in the presence of chloride. Anal. Chem. 43: 955-957.
  8. Maas, E.V. 1986. Salt tolerance of plants. Appl. Agric. Res. 1, 12-26.
  9. Maas, E.V., and Hoffman, G.J., 1977. Crop salt tolerance current assessment. Journal Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, 103 (IR2), 115-134.
  10. Maggio, A., Hasegawa, P.M., Bressan, R.A., Consiglio, M.F., and Joly, R.J. (2001). Unraveling the functional relationship between root anatomy and stress tolerance. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 28, 999-1004
  11. Mangal, J.L., Lal, S., Hooda P.,S., 1989. Salt tol