Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 5

Cep telefonunun en yakın pozisyonda kalbe etkileri

The cardiac effects of a mobile phone positioned closest to the heart

Pages
380–384
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We conclude that MP has no effect on hemodynamic (heart rate, blood pressure) and cardiac electrical activity (P-wave and QT dispersions) parameters when it is positioned on the chest in immediate proximity to the heart, and it does not cause cardiac autonomic dysfunction examined by HRV analysis in healthy adult subjects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mobile phone (MP) on cardiac electrical activity by examining the heart rate variability (HRV), QT, P dispersions and blood pressure (BP) while the MP is located on the precordium.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 24 healthy volunteers were included in this prospective study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We conclude that MP has no effect on hemodynamic (heart rate, blood pressure) and cardiac electrical activity (P-wave and QT dispersions) parameters when it is positioned on the chest in immediate proximity to the heart, and it does not cause cardiac autonomic dysfunction examined by HRV analysis in healthy adult subjects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mobile phone (MP) on cardiac electrical activity by examining the heart rate variability (HRV), QT, P dispersions and blood pressure (BP) while the MP is located on the precordium. Methods: A total of 24 healthy volunteers were included in this prospective study. In the first step; 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and BP recordings of the subjects without MP, while the MP is off, on, and ringing were recorded. In the second step; rhythm and BP were recorded for 30 minutes with the Holter without MP, and when the MP was “on” at the precordial location. P-wave and QT interval dispersions were measured from 12-lead ECG, while Holter 24-hour recordings were used for HRV analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t test for comparison of hemodynamic and HRV variables without MP and during MP on. ANOVA for repeated measures was used to compare hemodynamic and ECG variables through baseline and 3 experimental settings: MP on, off and ringing. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the BP, heart rate, P-wave dispersion, QT dispersion and QT corrected dispersion parameters (p>0.05) in the first step of the study. In the second step, there were no significant differences between two groups in the BP, heart rate and HRV parameters (p>0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that MP has no effect on hemodynamic (heart rate, blood pressure) and cardiac electrical activity (P-wave and QT dispersions) parameters when it is positioned on the chest in immediate proximity to the heart, and it does not cause cardiac autonomic dysfunction examined by HRV analysis in healthy adult subjects.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı cep telefonu (CT) prekordiyal bölgedeyken kalp hızı değişkenliği (KHD), QT ve P-dalga dispersiyonu ve kan basıncı (KB) değerlerini kullanarak kardiyak elektriksel aktiviteye CT’nun etkisini değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Bu prospektif çalışmaya 24 sağlıklı gönüllü alındı. İlk aşamada, CT olmaksızın, CT prekordiyal bölgede kalbin üzerinde kapalı, açık ve aranırken modlarında 12 derivasyonlu elektrokardiyografi (EKG) ve KB değerleri kaydedildi. İkinci aşamada; CT olmaksızın ve CT açık ve prekordiyal bölgedeyken 30’ar dakikalık Holter-EKG ve tansiyon-Holter ölçümleri yapıldı. P-dalga ve QT dispersiyonu 12 derivasyonlu EKG kayıtlarından hesaplandı, KHD ise 24-saat Holter kayıtlarından ölçüldü. İstatistiksel analizde, cep telefonu olmaksızın ve CT açık modunda, hemodinami ve KHD parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması için eşleştirilmiş t testi kullanıldı. Cep telefonu olmaksızın, kapalı, açık ve aranırken modlarında, hemodinami ve EKG parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması için tekrarlayan ölçümler için ANOVA testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmanın ilk aşamasında; gruplar arasında KB, kalp hızı, P-dalga ve QT dispersiyonu parametreleri açısından anlamlı ilişki tespit edilmedi (p>0.05). İkinci aşamada; 2 grup arasında KB, kalp hızı ve KHD parametreleri arasında anlamlı ilişki saptanmadı (p>0.05). Sonuç: Sağlıklı erişkin bireylerde CT farklı modlarda kalbe en yakın pozisyonda kalp hızı, kan basıncını etklilememekte ve kardiyak otonomik disfonksiyona neden olmamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAMER, A., GÜNDÜZ, H., ÖZYILDIRIM, S. (2022). Cep telefonunun en yakın pozisyonda kalbe etkileri. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 5, 380–384. https://ajindex.com/articles/436894

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Croft RJ, Chandler JS, Burgess AP, Barry RJ, Williams JD, Clarke AR. Acute mobile phone operation affects neural function in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113: 1623-32
  2. Deepinder F, Makker K, Agarwal A. Cell phones and male infertility: dissecting the relationship. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 15: 266-70
  3. Johansen C. Electromagnetic fields and health effectsepidemiologic studies of cancer, diseases of the central nervous system and arrhythmia-related heart disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 2004; 30 Suppl 1:1-30
  4. Oysu C, Topak M, Çelik O, Yılmaz HB, Şahin AA. Effects of the acute exposure to the electromagnetic field of mobile phones on human auditory brainstem responses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262: 839-43
  5. Wilén J, Johansson A, Kalezic N, Lyskov E, Sandström M. Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics 2006; 27: 204-14
  6. Barker AT, Jackson PR, Parry H, Coulton LA, Cook GG, Wood SM. The effect of GSM and TETRA mobile handset signals on blood pressure, catechol levels and heart rate variability. Bioelectromagnetics 2007; 28: 433-8
  7. Hietanen M, Hämäläinen AM, Husman T. Hypersensitivity symptoms associated with exposure to cellular telephones: no causal link. Bioelectromagnetics 2002; 23: 264-70
  8. Nam KC, Kim SW, Kim SC, Kim DW. Effects of RF exposure of teenagers and adults by CDMA cellular phones. Bioelectromagnetics 2006; 27: 509-14
  9. Tabor Z, Michalski J, Rokita E. Influence of 50 Hz magnetic field on human heart rate variability: linear and nonlinear analysis. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25: 474-80
  10. Tahvanainen K, Niño J, Halonen P, Kuusela T, Laitinen T, Länsimies E, et al. Cellular phone use does not acutely affect blood pressure or heart rate of humans. Bioelectromagnetics 2004; 25: 73-83
  11. Task Force. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation. and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation 1996; 93: 1043-65
  12. Barbaro V, Bartolini P, Donato A, Militello C, Altamura G, Ammirati F, et al. Do European GSM mobile cellular phones pose a potential risk to pacemaker patients? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995; 18: 1218-24
  13. Özgüner F, Altınbaş A, Özaydın M, Doğan A, Vural H, Kişioğlu AN, et al. Mobile phone-induced myocardial oxidative stress: protection by a novel antioxidant agent caffeic acid phenethyl ester. Toxic