Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Retrospective analysis of 1650 permanent pacemaker implantations experience over two different consecutive time periods in a single cardiology clinic

Bir kardiyoloji kliniğinde ardışık 2 ayrı dönemde takılan 1650 kalıcı kalp pilinin retrospektif karşılaştırmalı incelemesi

Pages
130–134
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implantation of VVI-AAI pacemakers have decreased (77.8%/1.5% to 51%/0.3%, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Indications for pacing, pacing modes, and demographics of patients who underwent pacemaker implantation between two different time periods were compared in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Pacemaker registry of our cardiology department was used to evaluate these changes from 1986 to 2007 (First period: 1986-1996, second period: 1997-2007) retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implantation of VVI-AAI pacemakers have decreased (77.8%/1.5% to 51%/0.3%, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Indications for pacing, pacing modes, and demographics of patients who underwent pacemaker implantation between two different time periods were compared in this study. Methods: Pacemaker registry of our cardiology department was used to evaluate these changes from 1986 to 2007 (First period: 1986-1996, second period: 1997-2007) retrospectively. Results: Registry revealed 776 implantations in the first and 874 implantations in the second period. The percentages of first implantation were 89% and 70.1%respectively. Nearly 50% of the patients in both periods were female. Main indications for pacing were atrioventricular (AV) block, sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and slow ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation in both periods. Implantation of VVI-AAI pacemakers have decreased (77.8%/1.5% to 51%/0.3%, p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada bir kardiyoloji kliniğinde kalıcı kalp pili (KKP) implantasyonunun başladığı tarihten günümüze kadar olan zaman içerisinde oluşan farklılıkların araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde KKP implantasyonunun başladığı 1986 yılından günümüze kadar olan sürede, konu ile ilgili veriler iki farklı zaman diliminde (1. dönem: 1986-1996, 2. dönem: 1997-2007) retrospektif olarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Birinci dönemde 776, 2. dönemde 874 KKP implantasyonu gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bunların sırası ile %89’u ve %70.1’i ilk implantasyondur. Kadın hasta yüzdeleri her iki dönemde %50’i kadar idi. Başta gelen KKP takılma endikasyonları, her iki dönemde de sırası ile atriyoventriküler (AV) blok, hasta sinüs sendromu (HSS) ve yavaş ventriküler yanıtlı atriyal fibrilasyondur. Birinci dönemde %77.8 ve %1.5 olan VVI ve AAI KKP takılma yüzdeleri, 2. dönemde anlamlı derecede azalmıştır (sırası ile %51 ve %0.3 p

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCI, E., ARIKAN, E., BAYATA, S., POSTACI, N., CEYLAN, Ö., BERİLĞEN, R., YEŞİL, M. (2022). Retrospective analysis of 1650 permanent pacemaker implantations experience over two different consecutive time periods in a single cardiology clinic. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 130–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/436824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Nelson G. A brief history of cardiac pacing. Tex Heart Inst J 1993
  2. PMid:8508058 PMCid:325046 2. Gold M. Permanent pacing: new indications. Heart 2001
  3. Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, et al. ACC/AHA/-NASPE 2002 Guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: Summary article. Circulation 2002
  4. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000035996.46455.09 PMid:12379588 4. Toff WD, Camm AJ, Skchan JD. For the United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events (UKPACE) Trial investigators. Single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing for high-grade atrioventricular block. N Engl J Med 2005
  5. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042283 PMid:16014884 5. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweenay MO, Silvermann R, Leon A, Yee R, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction. New Engl J Med 2002
  6. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa013040 PMid:12063369 6. Edhag O, Swahn A. Prognosis of patients with complete heart block or arrhythmic syncope who were not treated with artificial pacemaker. A long-term follow-up study of 101 patients. Acta Med Scand 1976
  7. PMid:1015354 7. Kerr CR, Connoly SJ, Abdollah H. Canadian trial of Physiological Pacing: Effects of physiological pacing during long-term follow-up. Circulation 2004
  8. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000109490.72104.EE PMid:14707022 8. Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, Vesterlund T, Thomsen PE. Prospective randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994
  9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90347-6 9. Duff HJ, Raj SR, Exner DV, Sheldon RS, Roach D, Mitchell LB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of fixed rate versus rate responsive pacing after radiofrequency atrioventricular junction ablation: quality of life, ventricular refractoriness, and paced QT dispersion. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003
  10. doi:10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03168.x PMid:14678128 10. Karaoğuz R, Yazıcıoğlu N, Özin B, Mercanoğlu F, Tezcan UK. Türkiye’de 2000, 2001 ve 2002 yılı kalıcı kalp pili bildirimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Kardiyol Dern Arş 2004
  11. Ector H, Rickards AF, Kappenberger L. The world survey of cardiac pacing and cardioverter defibrillators: Calendar year 1997-Asian Pasific, Middle East, Sauth America, and Canada. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001
  12. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00863.x PMid:11388106 12. Styliadis IH, Mantziari AP, Gouzoumas NI, Vassili