SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Kalıcı pacemaker lı olgularda koroner arter hastalığı ciddiyetinin akut uyarı eşiği ve lead empedansı üzerine etkisini araştıran gözlemsel bir çalışma

An observational study of the effect of coronary artery disease severity on acute pacing threshold and lead impedance in patients with permanent pacemaker

Erdinç ARIKAN
Serdar BAYATA
Nursen POSTACI
Selim EKİNCİ
Murat YEŞİL
Özgen ŞAFAK
Emre ÖZDEMİR
Veysel Kutay VURGUN
Pages
208–213
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Ventricular pacing thresholds were found significantly higher ICD group compared with PM group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study investigated the effect of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, distribution and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on acute ventricular pacing threshold and lead impedance at the time of pacemaker implantation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: One hundred and thirty-two patients who received a ventricular pacemaker or internal cardioverter-defibrilator (ICD) lead in our institution between 2007-2010 were included in this observational study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Ventricular pacing thresholds were found significantly higher ICD group compared with PM group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the effect of coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, distribution and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on acute ventricular pacing threshold and lead impedance at the time of pacemaker implantation. Methods: One hundred and thirty-two patients who received a ventricular pacemaker or internal cardioverter-defibrilator (ICD) lead in our institution between 2007-2010 were included in this observational study. Patients were divided into ICD and anti-bradycardic pacemaker (PM) groups. Groups were compared for ventricular stimulation threshold, lead impedance and LVEF. Later, groups were sub-grouped according to the severity and distribution of CAD and subgroups were compared in both groups for ventricular stimulation threshold, lead impedance. Quantitative data of groups were compared by means of independent samples t-test. Results: Ventricular pacing thresholds were found significantly higher ICD group compared with PM group (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada kliniğimizde kalıcı endokardiyal kalp pili implantasyonu yapılan hastalarda, implantasyon sırasındaki ventriküler uyarı eşiği ve empedansı ile koroner arter hastalığı (KAH) ciddiyeti, lokalizasyonu ve sol ventrikül (LV) ejeksiyon fraksiyonu (EF) arasındaki ilişki araştırılmıştır. Yöntemler: Bu gözlemsel çalışmaya 2007-2010 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde ventriküler leadi bulunan kalıcı pacemaker veya internal defibrillatör- kardiyoverter (ICD) takılan 132 hasta alındı. Hastalar ICD ve antibradikardik pacemaker (PM) hastaları olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Bu iki grup ventriküler uyarı eşiği, lead empedansı ve LVEF açısından karşılaştırıldı. Daha sonra her iki grup hasta incelenen KAH parametreleri yönünden iki alt gruba ayrılmış ve alt grupların ortalama uyarı eşiği ve empedans değerleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Gruplar arasında verilerin karşılaştırılmasında bağımsız örneklem t-testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: İnternal defibrillator-kardiyoverter grubunda ventriküler uyarı eşiği değerleri PM grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı yüksek bulundu. Ventriküler empedans ve LVEF değerleri ise ICD grubunda anlamlı derecede düşük bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIKAN, E., BAYATA, S., POSTACI, N., EKİNCİ, S., YEŞİL, M., ŞAFAK, Ö., ÖZDEMİR, E., VURGUN, V. K. (2022). Kalıcı pacemaker lı olgularda koroner arter hastalığı ciddiyetinin akut uyarı eşiği ve lead empedansı üzerine etkisini araştıran gözlemsel bir çalışma. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 208–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/436497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Mond HG. Pacing leads. In: Kusumato FM, Goldschlager NF, editors. Cardiac pacing for the clinician. Philadelphia:Williams&Wilkins; 2001.p.3-40
  2. Tıkız H. Kalıcı kap pilleri ve elektrodlar. In: Oto A, Aytemir K, et al. Editors. Kalıcı kalp pilleri ve implante edilebilir defibrilatorler. Ankara: Erkem tıbbi yayıncılık: 2006.p.3-18
  3. Atlee JL. Cardiac pacing and electroversion. In: Kaplan JA, editors. Cardiac Anesthesia. 4th ed. Philadelphia:WB Saunders;1999. p. 959-89
  4. Schuchert A, van Langen H, Michels K, Meinertz T. Low stimulation impedance in pacemaker patients with cardiac diseases. The Thera Pacemaker Study Group. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1996; 121: 1046-9
  5. Tandoğan I, Yetkin E, Guray Y, Aksoy Y, Sezgin AT, Ozdemir R, et al. Distribution of coronary artery lesions in patients with permanent pacemakers. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2002; 4: 279-83
  6. Yeşil M, Arıkan E, Postacı N, Bayata S, Yılmaz R. Locations of coronary artery lesions in patients with severe conduction disturbances. Int Heart J 2008; 49: 525-31
  7. Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W. Incidence of coronary artery disease and necessity of revascularization in symptomatic patients requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. Med Klin 2008; 103: 827-30
  8. Schuchert A, Aydın MA, Israel C, Gaby G, Paul V. Atrial pacing and sensing characteristics in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace 2005; 7: 165-9
  9. Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA, Liu Z, Levine P, Porter TR, Zhang X; ROVA Trial Investigators. Serial changes in right ventricular apical pacing lead impedance predict changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and functional class in heart failure patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 50-3
  10. Kostiainen S, Vilkko P, Appelqvist P. Stimulation threshold of myocardial electrodes in long-term cardiac pacing. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 14: 213-6
  11. Tse HF, Yu C, Paul VE, Boriani G, Schuchert A, del Ojo JL, et al. Effect of left ventricular function on long-term left ventricular pacing and sensing threshold. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2003; 9: 21-4
  12. Apstein CS, Deckelbaum L, Mueller M, Hagopian L, Hood WB Jr. Graded global ischemia and reperfusion. Cardiac function and lactate metabolism. Circulation 1977; 55: 864-72
  13. Stokes KB, Kay GN. Artificial electrical cardiac stimulation. In: Ellenbogen KA, Kay GN, Wilkoff BL, editors. Clinical Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000. p. 45