Journals / Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Ortotopik kalp naklinde kullanılan cerrahi teknik ritm ile ilgili sonuçları etkiler mi?

Does the surgical technique used in the orthotopic heart transplant affect the results regarding the rhythm?

Pages
55–260
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: In the biatrial group, the temporary pacemaker requirement (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the requirement for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion and the incidence of the problems regarding the rhythm following heart transplantation with the bicaval or biatrial technique in the early postoperative period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Sixty-one patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between the dates of September 1989 and December 2008 in our clinics were included to the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: In the biatrial group, the temporary pacemaker requirement (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the requirement for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion and the incidence of the problems regarding the rhythm following heart transplantation with the bicaval or biatrial technique in the early postoperative period. Methods: Sixty-one patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation between the dates of September 1989 and December 2008 in our clinics were included to the study. The study was designed as retrospective analysis, and all data were collected from hospital records. The transplantation was performed by using standard biatrial method in 28 of the patients, by using bicaval anastomosis method in 33 of the patients. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square, Fischer s exact and Mann-Whitney U tests. Predictors of temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results: In the biatrial group, the temporary pacemaker requirement (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, bikaval ya da biatrial teknik ile kalp naklini takiben kalıcı ve geçici kalp pili gereksinimi ve ritim ile ilgili problemlerin sıklığını karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde Eylül 1989 ile Aralık 2008 yılları arasında ortotopik kalp nakli yapılan 61 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bu çalışma retrospektif analiz olarak dizayn edildi ve hastalara ait veriler hastane kayıtlarından toplandı. Hastaların 28ine standart biatriyal, 33üne bikaval anastomoz tekniği kullanılarak nakil yapıldı. İstatistiksel analiz $chi^{2}$, Fischers exact ve Mann-Whitney U testleri ile yapıldı. Geçici ve kalıcı pacemaker için prediktörler lojistik regresyon analiz ile incelendi. Bulgular: Biatriyal grupta geçici pacemaker gereksinimi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, İ., YILDIRIM, T., TOKER, M. E., AY, Y., BALKANAY, M., KÖKSAL, C., YANARTAŞ, M. (2022). Ortotopik kalp naklinde kullanılan cerrahi teknik ritm ile ilgili sonuçları etkiler mi?. Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 55–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/436486

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Lower RR, Shumway NE. Studies on orthotopic homotransplantation of the canine heart. Surg Forum 1960; 11: 18-9
  2. Donald B. Doty. Cardiac Transplantation. In Cardiac Surgery. Year Book Medical Publisher. Inc. Chicago 1987
  3. Sarsam MA, Campbell CS, Yonan NA, Deiraniya AK, Rahman AN. An alternative surgical technique in orthotopic cardiac transplantation. J Card Surg 1993; 8: 344-9
  4. Heinz G, Kratochwill C, Koller-Strametz J, Kreiner G, Grimm M, Grabenwoger M, et al. Benign prognosis of early sinus nod dysfunction after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998; 21: 422-9
  5. Kratochwill C, Schmid S, Koller-Strametz J, Kreiner G, Grabenwoger M, Grimm M, et al. Decrease in pacemaker incidence after orthotopic heart transplantation. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 779-83
  6. Scott DC, McComb JM, Dark JH, Bexton RS. Permanent pacing after cardiac transplantation. Br Heart J 1993; 69: 399-403
  7. Bacal F, Bocci EA, Vieira ML, Lopes N, Moreira LF, Fiorelli A, et al. Permanent and temporary pacemaker implantation after orthotopic heart transplantation. Arq Bras Cardiol 2000; 74: 9-12
  8. Jacquet L, Ziady G, Stein K, Griffith B, Armitage J, Hardesty R, et al. Cardiac rhythm disturbances early after orthotopic heart transplantation: prevalence and clinical importance of the observed abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 832-7
  9. Rothman SA, Jeevanandam V, Combs WG, Furukawa S, Hsia HH, Eisen HJ, et al. Eliminating bradyarrhythmias after orthotopic heart transplantation. Circulation 1996; 94: II278-82
  10. Meyer SR, Modry DL, Bainey K, Kohsal A, Mullen JC, Rebeyka IM, et al. Declining need for permanent pacemaker insertion with the bicaval technique of orthotopic heart transplantation. Can J Cardiol 2005; 21: 159-63
  11. Angerman CE, Spes CH, Tammen A, Stempfle HU, Schutz A, Kemkes BM, et al. Anatomic characteristics and valvular function of the transplanted heart: transthoracic versus transesophageal echocardiographic findings. J Heart Transplant 1990; 9: 331-8
  12. Marti V, Ballester M, Oter R, Obrador D, Bayes-De Luna A. Recovery of sinus node function after pacemaker implant for sinus node disease following cardiac transplantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991; 14: 1205-8
  13. Locali RF, Matsuoka PK, Cherbo T, Gabriel EA, Buffolo E. Should biatrial heart transplantation still be performed? A Meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cardiol 2010; 94: 829-40
  14. Schnoor M, Schafer T, Luhmann D, Sievers HH. Bicaval versus standard technique in orth