SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative and Chinese Naval Strategy

21. Yüzyıl Deniz İpek Yolu Girişiminin Çin Donanma Stratejisi ile İlişkisi

Göktürk TÜYSÜZOĞLU
Cenk ÖZGEN
Pages
283–303
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thisstudy, based on literature review, aims to analyze the relationship betweenthe 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative and Chinese Naval Strategy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:China, who has put its economic might right at the center of its globalinfluence, wants to consolidate its efforts in this regard with the 21stCentury Maritime Silk Road Initiative.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As this initiative shall increase thestrength of China within the context, specific to South China Sea-IndianOcean, it has also potential to make the states in the region economicallydependent to Beijing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thisstudy, based on literature review, aims to analyze the relationship betweenthe 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative and Chinese Naval Strategy.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

China, who has put its economic might right at the center of its globalinfluence, wants to consolidate its efforts in this regard with the 21stCentury Maritime Silk Road Initiative. As this initiative shall increase thestrength of China within the context, specific to South China Sea-IndianOcean, it has also potential to make the states in the region economicallydependent to Beijing. For an endeavor like this to succeed, China will needto prioritize the security of the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road. Right atthis point, the new Chinese Naval Strategy that is predicated upon theexpansion towards the high seas comes to the forefront. The investments andchanging naval strategy that commence in parallel to the base and portfacilities that would be obtained from various countries within the 21stCentury Maritime Silk Road Initiative prove that China’s trade orientedleaps and its military and political planning have a striking parallelism. Thisstudy, based on literature review, aims to analyze the relationship betweenthe 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative and Chinese Naval Strategy.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜYSÜZOĞLU, G., ÖZGEN, C. (2022). The Relationship between the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Initiative and Chinese Naval Strategy. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 283–303. https://ajindex.com/articles/434788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AMIN, M. (2017). “How Sanctions-Stricken Sudan Sold Its Economy to China”, Middleeast Eye, http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/made-china-how-sanctions-stricken-sudansold-itself-beijing-1669522131, (Accessed 01.04.2018).
  2. BABIARZ, R. (2017). “China’s Sea Based Nuclear Deterrent: Incremental Advances and Perennial Limitations”, Asia Dialogue, http://theasiadialogue.com/2017/04/05/ chinassea-based-nuclear-deterrent-incremental-advances-and-perennial-limitations/, (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  3. BENDER, J. and Rosen, A. (2015). “This Pentagon Map Shows What’s Really Driving China’s Military and Diplomatic Strategy”, Business Insider, https://www. businessinsider.in/This-Pentagon-map-shows-whats-really-driving-Chinas-militaryand-diplomatic-strategy/articleshow/47273547.cms, (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  4. BENNETT, D. (2010). “An Analysis of the China’s Offshore Active Defense and the People’s Liberation Army Navy”. Global Security Studies, 1(1), 126-141.
  5. BLANCHARD, J.-M. F. and FLINT, C. (2017). “The Geopolitics of China's Maritime Silk Road Initiative”. Geopolitics, 22(2), 223-245.
  6. BOYD, H. and WALDWYN, T. (2017). “China’s Submarine Force: An Overview”, IISS, https://www.iiss.org/en/militarybalanceblog/blogsections/2017-edcc/october0c50/chinas-submarine-force-1c50, (Accessed 01.02.2018).
  7. CAI, P. (2017). “Understanding China's Belt and Road Initiative”. Lowy Institute Policy Analysis. CHATURVEDY, R. R. (2017). “China's Strategic Access to Gwadar Port: Pivotal Position in Beltand Road”. RSIS Commentary, No. 5. China Daily (2014). “Malaysia Becomes China's 3rd Largest Trade Partner in Asia”, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2014-01/21/content_17247588.htm, (Accessed 29.03.2018).
  8. CONNELLY, A. L. (2017). “Indonesia's New North Natuna Sea: What's in a Name?”, Lowy Institute The Interpreter, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/indonesia-snew-north-natuna-sea-what-s-name, (Accessed 29.03.2018).
  9. ENGELBREKT, K. and Watts, J. (2015). “Sino-Russian Strategic Cooperation: Still An “Axis of Convenience”. Swedish Defence Univesity Report. GADKARI, N. (2018). “India-Thailand-Myanmar Trilateral Highwayby 2019”, Live Mint, https://www.livemint.com/Politics/hdV9E00I5CwSrKmSheAu6M/IndiaMyanmarThai land-Trilateral-Highway-by-2019-Nitin-Gad.html, (Accessed 31.03.2018). Global Security (w.date). “People’s Liberation Navy - Offshore Defense”, https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/plan-doctrine-offshore.htm, (Accessed 18.01.2018).
  10. GREITENS, S. C. (2016). “The US-Philippine Al