Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Effects of different feedback strategies on students perceptions of social cognitive and teaching presence and academic achievements in online learning environments

Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında farklı geribildirim stratejilerinin öğrencilerin sosyal bilişsel ve öğretimsel bulunuşluk algıları ile akademik başarılarına etkisi

Pages
243–261
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, majority of the students from both groupsfound the online environment they used and the educational activities satisfactory.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to identify the effects of different feedback strategies on students perceptions of social, cognitive and teaching presence and academic achievements in theonline learning environments designed in consideration of strategies which ca n be put towork to build a community of inquiry and ensure its continuity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All analyses were made on the data from 41 students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, majority of the students from both groupsfound the online environment they used and the educational activities satisfactory.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to identify the effects of different feedback strategies on students perceptions of social, cognitive and teaching presence and academic achievements in theonline learning environments designed in consideration of strategies which ca n be put towork to build a community of inquiry and ensure its continuity. In this regard, explanatorydesign used in the study. All analyses were made on the data from 41 students. Thefeedback strategies practiced in the study failed to demonstrate sign ificant differences interms of the students final academic achievement scores. The feedback strategiespracticed in the study failed to demonstrate significant differences in terms of thestudents perceptions of social, cognitive and teaching presence, and scores from the community of inquiry scale in general. Finally, majority of the students from both groupsfound the online environment they used and the educational activities satisfactory.

Özet

Bu araştırma kapsamında; araştırma topluluğu oluş turmada ve devamlılığını sağlamadaişe koşulabilecek stratejiler dikkate alınarak tasarlanan çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarındafarklı geribildirim stratejilerinin öğrencilerin sosyal, bilişsel ve öğretimsel bulunuşlukalgıları ile akademik başarılarına etkisi incelenmiştir. Açıklayıcı desen kullanılarakyürütülen araştırma, uygulama sürecine düzenli bir şekilde katılan 41 öğrenciden eldeedilen veriler ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Öğrencilerin uygulama süreci sonunda elde ettikleriakademik başarı puanları, uygulanan geribildirim stratejisine göre anlamlı bir farklılıkgöstermemiştir. Ö ğrencilerin sosyal, bilişsel ve öğretimsel bulunuşluk algıları ilearaştırma topluluğu ölçeğinin genelinden aldıkları puanlar da, uygulanan geribildirimstratejisine göre anlamlı bir farklılık göstermemiştir. Son olarak; her iki gruptakiöğrencilerin büyük çoğunluğu, kullandıkları çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamını iyi olaraknitelenmiş ve aldıkları eğitimden memnun kaldıklarını ifade etmişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OLPAK, Y. Z., KILIÇ, E. Ç. (2022). Effects of different feedback strategies on students perceptions of social cognitive and teaching presence and academic achievements in online learning environments. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 243–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/431232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12 (3), 3 –22. Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1995). Critical thinking in distance education: Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context. Higher Education, 29 (2), 183 –199. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garriso n, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5 (2), 1 –17. Aragon, S. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuin g Education, 2003 (100), 57 –68. Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11 (1), 73 –85. Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan -Fich, R. (2005). Contextual factors that influence ALN effectiveness. Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1, 123 –144. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland -Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instru ment: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11 (3), 133 –136. Bach, S., Haynes, P., & Smith, J. L. (2007). Online learning and teaching in higher education (p. 209). McG raw -Hill International. Berge, Z. L., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Haneghan, J. V. (2002). Barriers to distance education and training: Survey results. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3 (4), 409 –418. Cavanaugh, J. (2005). Teaching online-A time comparis on. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8 (1). Conceição, S. C., & Schmidt, S. W. (2010). How non -content related forums influence social presence in the online learning environment. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 19 (2), 73 –85. De Bruyn, L. L. (2004). Monitoring online communication: can the development of convergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment? Distance Education, 25 (1), 67 –81. Drago, W., Peltier, J., & Sorensen, D. (2002). Course content or the instru ctor: Which is more important in on -line teaching? Management Research News, 25 (6/7), 69 –83. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed