SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Effects of Different Feedback Strategies on Students’ Perceptions of Social Cognitive and Teaching Presence and Academic Achievements in Online Learning Environments

ÇEVRİMİÇİ ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARINDA FARKLI GERİBİLDİRİM STRATEJİLERİNİN ÖĞRENCİLERİN SOSYAL BİLİŞSEL VE ÖĞRETİMSEL BULUNUŞLUK ALGILARI İLE AKADEMİK BAŞARILARINA ETKİSİ

Yusuf Ziya OLPAK
Ebru ÇAKMAK
Pages
243–261
Publication Date
2014-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, majority of the students from both groups found the online environment they used and the educational activities satisfactory

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to identify the effects of different feedback strategies on students’ perceptions of social, cognitive and teaching presence and academic achievements in the online learning environments designed in consideration of strategies which can be put to work to build a community of inquiry and ensure its continuity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All analyses were made on the data from 41 students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, majority of the students from both groups found the online environment they used and the educational activities satisfactory
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:community of inquiry framework · social presence · cognitive presence

Abstract

This study aims to identify the effects of different feedback strategies on students’ perceptions of social, cognitive and teaching presence and academic achievements in the online learning environments designed in consideration of strategies which can be put to work to build a community of inquiry and ensure its continuity. In this regard, explanatory design used in the study. All analyses were made on the data from 41 students. The feedback strategies practiced in the study failed to demonstrate significant differences in terms of the students’ final academic achievement scores. The feedback strategies practiced in the study failed to demonstrate significant differences in terms of the students’ perceptions of social, cognitive and teaching presence, and scores from the community of inquiry scale in general. Finally, majority of the students from both groups found the online environment they used and the educational activities satisfactory

Özet

Bu araştırma kapsamında; araştırma topluluğu oluşturmada ve devamlılığını sağlamada işe koşulabilecek stratejiler dikkate alınarak tasarlanan çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında farklı geribildirim stratejilerinin öğrencilerin sosyal, bilişsel ve öğretimsel bulunuşluk algıları ile akademik başarılarına etkisi incelenmiştir. Açıklayıcı desen kullanılarak yürütülen araştırma, uygulama sürecine düzenli bir şekilde katılan 41 öğrenciden elde edilen veriler ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Öğrencilerin uygulama süreci sonunda elde ettikleri akademik başarı puanları, uygulanan geribildirim stratejisine göre anlamlı bir farklılık göstermemiştir. Öğrencilerin sosyal, bilişsel ve öğretimsel bulunuşluk algıları ile araştırma topluluğu ölçeğinin genelinden aldıkları puanlar da, uygulanan geribildirim stratejisine göre anlamlı bir farklılık göstermemiştir. Son olarak; her iki gruptaki öğrencilerin büyük çoğunluğu, kullandıkları çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamını iyi olarak nitelenmiş ve aldıkları eğitimden memnun kaldıklarını ifade etmişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OLPAK, Y. Z., ÇAKMAK, E. (2014). Effects of Different Feedback Strategies on Students’ Perceptions of Social Cognitive and Teaching Presence and Academic Achievements in Online Learning Environments. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 243–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/263623

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3), 3–22.
  2. Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1995). Critical thinking in distance education: Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context. Higher Education, 29(2), 183–199.
  3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
  4. Aragon, S. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(100), 57–68.
  5. Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 73–85.
  6. Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2005). Contextual factors that influence ALN effectiveness. Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1, 123–144.
  7. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133–136.
  8. Bach, S., Haynes, P., & Smith, J. L. (2007). Online learning and teaching in higher education (p. 209). McGraw-Hill International. Berge, Z. L., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Haneghan, J. V. (2002). Barriers to distance education and training: Survey results. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 409–418.
  9. Cavanaugh, J. (2005). Teaching online-A time comparison. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Conceição, S. C., & Schmidt, S. W. (2010). How non-content related forums influence social presence in the online learning environment. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 19(2), 73–85.
  10. De Bruyn, L. L. (2004). Monitoring online communication: can the development of convergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment? Distance Education, 25(1), 67–81.
  11. Drago, W., Peltier, J., & Sorensen, D. (2002). Course content or the instructor: Which is more important in on-line teaching? Management Research News, 25(6/7), 69–83.
  12. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Garrison, D. R. (19