SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Analysis of Online Student Connectedness Levels of Inonu UniversityDistance Education Students in Terms of Some Variables

The aim of this research was to provide an in-depth analysis of Inonu University Distance Education Students' Level of Online Student Connectedness in terms of some variables. Formal and distance education students’ online student conn

Süleyman Nihat Şad
Feride Sel
Pages
860–904
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to collect data“Personal Information Form” and “Online Student Connectedness Survey” were used.Results showed that while distance education students feel comfortable in onlinelearning environments in general, formal education students have lower online studentconnectedness levels and they do not feel comfortable in the distance learningenvironment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research was to provide an in-depth analysis of Inonu UniversityDistance Education Students' Level of Online Student Connectedness in terms of somevariables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participantscomprised 944 students, 646 formal students who took 5 / ı courses (Atatürk's Principlesand History of Revolution, Turkish Language and Foreign Language) through web- based instruction, and 298 distance education program students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to collect data“Personal Information Form” and “Online Student Connectedness Survey” were used.Results showed that while distance education students feel comfortable in onlinelearning environments in general, formal education students have lower online studentconnectedness levels and they do not feel comfortable in the distance learningenvironment.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this research was to provide an in-depth analysis of Inonu UniversityDistance Education Students' Level of Online Student Connectedness in terms of somevariables. Formal and distance education students’ online student connectedness levelswere defined and analyzed in terms of way of education, gender and academic success.This study was conducted according to associational research design. Participantscomprised 944 students, 646 formal students who took 5 / ı courses (Atatürk's Principlesand History of Revolution, Turkish Language and Foreign Language) through web- based instruction, and 298 distance education program students. In order to collect data“Personal Information Form” and “Online Student Connectedness Survey” were used.Results showed that while distance education students feel comfortable in onlinelearning environments in general, formal education students have lower online studentconnectedness levels and they do not feel comfortable in the distance learningenvironment. Also, a low level of sense of community was observed among theparticipant students in the study

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, İnönü Üniversitesinde öğrenim gören örgün ve uzaktan eğitimöğrencilerinin çevrimiçi öğrenci bağlılık düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısındanincelenmesidir. Örgün eğitim ve uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin çevrimiçi bağlılıkdüzeyleri öğrenim türü, cinsiyet ve akademik başarı değişkenleri açısından betimlenmişve analiz edilmiştir. İlişkisel tarama deseninde yapılandırılan araştırmaya İnönüÜniversitesinin 5/ı derslerini (Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi, Türk Dili ve Yabancı Dil)uzaktan eğitim yoluyla alan 646 örgün eğitim öğrencisi ile tüm derslerini uzaktan eğitimyoluyla alan 298 uzaktan eğitim programı öğrencisi olmak üzere toplam 944 öğrencikatılmıştır. Verilerin toplanması amacıyla ‘Çevrimiçi Öğrenci Bağlılık Ölçeği’kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin çevrimiçiortamlarda kendilerini daha rahat hissettikleri; örgün eğitim öğrencilerinin çevrimiçiöğrenci bağlılık düzeylerinin düşük olduğu ve çevrimiçi derslerde kendilerini daha azrahat hissettikleri görülmüştür. Ayrıca araştırmada öğrencilerin topluluk hissinin düşükdüzeyde olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

Şad, S. N., Sel, F. (2022). Analysis of Online Student Connectedness Levels of Inonu UniversityDistance Education Students in Terms of Some Variables. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 860–904. https://ajindex.com/articles/430780

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Al, U., ve Madran, R. O. (2004). Web tabanlı uzaktan eğitim sistemleri: Sahip olması gereken özellikler ve standartlar. Bilgi Dünyası, 5(2), 259-271.
  2. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N. ve Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3
  3. Akça, O. (2006). SAU uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin iletişim engelleri ile ilgili öğrenci görüşleri. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya üniversitesi, Sakarya. Arbaugh, J. B. ve Hornik, S. (2006). Do Chickering ve Gamson’s seven principles also apply to online MBAs? The Journal of Educators Online, 3(2), 1-18.
  4. Armfield, D. M., Kennedy, K., ve Duin, A. H. (2015). Extended abstract: The roles of networked learning, collaboration, and connectedness in the classroom. In 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, IPCC 2014 (Vol. 2015-January). [7020369] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: 10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020369. Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration, Distance Education, 27(2), 139-153, DOI: 10.1080/01587910600789498. Berigel, M.(2013). Öğretim elemanlarının uzaktan eğitim ortamlarına uyum süreçlerinin incelenmesi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi,
  5. Trabzon. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., ve Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of theempirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
  6. Bolliger, D. U., ve Inan, F. A. (2012). Development and validation of the Online Student Connectedness Survey (OSCS). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 41-65.
  7. Brown, R. E. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18-35.
  8. Burma, Z. A. (2008). AB’ye geçiş sürecinde meslek elemanlarının uzaktan öğretim ile eğitimi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 1(2), 15-20.
  9. Chickering, A. W., ve Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3, 2-6.
  10. Crisp, B. R. (2010). Belonging, connectedness and social exclusion. Journal of Social Inclusion, 1(2), 123- 132. Davies, J., ve Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e‐learning: on