Journals / Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of propofol and midazolam plus propofol sedation for magnetic resonance imaging in children

Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme yapılacak çocuklarda propofol ile midazolam+propofol sedasyonunun karşılaştırılması

Pages
13–18
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: In mentally retarded children, intramuscular midazolam injection followed by propofol resulted in better cooperation and sedation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and objective: The aim of this investigation was to study the effects of propofol and midazolam followed by propofol on children who had epilepsy and mental retardation, and could not be sufficiently sedated with orally administered chloral hydrate and cardiac cocktail for Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We have compared the sedation levels using the Ramsay Sedation Score maintained by the infusion of either propofol alone or followed by intramuscular administration of midazolam in 23 neurologically debilitated children aged 4-10 years undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: In mentally retarded children, intramuscular midazolam injection followed by propofol resulted in better cooperation and sedation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and objective: The aim of this investigation was to study the effects of propofol and midazolam followed by propofol on children who had epilepsy and mental retardation, and could not be sufficiently sedated with orally administered chloral hydrate and cardiac cocktail for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Methods: We have compared the sedation levels using the Ramsay Sedation Score maintained by the infusion of either propofol alone or followed by intramuscular administration of midazolam in 23 neurologically debilitated children aged 4-10 years undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The patients received a slow intravenous bolus injection of 2 mg kg propofol followed by continuous infusion, with (n= 11 ) or without (n= 12) midazolam (0.2 mg kg ) sedation given intramuscularly 15 minutes before the Magnetic Resonance Imaging._Mann Whitney U, Chi square and Fisher's exact tests were used for the statistical analysis testing, p< 0.05 were considered to have statistical significance. Results: Sedation level was higher in midazolam plus propofol group than propofol group immediately before intravenous cannulation, and during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (p = 0.002; p = 0.001 respectively). In both groups, the respiratory rate decreased significantly following the injection of propofol (p =0.025 and p= 0.021 ). Patients in the propofol group recovered rapidly. At the end of the first hour, the recovery scores of both groups were similar. In the dose scheme we have used, propofol produced sedation during Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Conclusions: In mentally retarded children, intramuscular midazolam injection followed by propofol resulted in better cooperation and sedation.

Özet

Amaç: Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme için oral kloral hidrat veya kardiyolojik kokteyl ile yeterli sedasyon sağlanamayan mental retardasyonu ve epilepsisi olan çocuklarda propofol ile midazolamı takiben uygulanan propofol sedasyonu bulgularını karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntem: Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme yapılan 4-10 yaş arası nörolojik bozukluğu olan 23 çocukta propofolün tek başına veya intramuskuler midazolamdan sonra uygulandığında sağlanan sedasyon seviyeleri Ramsay Sedasyon Skoruna göre karşılaştırıldı. Manyetik rezonans görüntülemeden 15 dakika önce hastalara intramuskuler 0.2 mg kg midazolam sedasyonu yapılarak (n=11 ) veya yapılmadan (n=12) 2 mg kg propofol intravenöz yavaş bolusu takiben sürekli infüzyon şeklinde uygulandı (n = 12). İstatistiksel değerlendirmede Mann Whitney U, Ki kare ve Fisher exact testleri kullanıldı, p

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTÜRK, Ö., ORAL, H., KURT, N. (2022). Comparison of propofol and midazolam plus propofol sedation for magnetic resonance imaging in children. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 13–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/429134

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Eldevik OP, Rockwell DT, Wong JH, Tait AR. Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: Adverse events and outcomes. Br J Anaesth2000
  2. Hubbard AM, Markowitz RI, Kimmel B, Kroger M, Bartko MB. Sedation for pediatric patients undergoing CT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992
  3. Peden CJ, Menon DK, Hall AS, Sargentoni J, Whitham JG. Magnetic resonance for the anaesthetist. Anaesthesia 1992
  4. 50817. 4.Frush DP, Bisset III GS. Sedation of children in radiology: Time to wake up. AJR1995
  5. Karhk SJ, Heatherley T, Pavan F, Stein J, Lebrron F. Patient anesthesia and monitoring at 1.5 Tesla MRI installation. MagnResonMed 1988
  6. Bloomfield EL, Masaryk TJ, Caplin A, Obuchowski NA, Schubert A, Hayden, Ebrahim ZY, Ruggieri PM, Goske MJ, Ross JS. Intravenous sedation for MR imaging of the brain and spine in children: Pentobarbital versus propofol. Radiology 1993
  7. Vangerven M. Light anaesthesia with propofol for paediatric MRI. Anaesthesia 1992
  8. Reinhold P. Propofol zur sedierung bei padiatrischen Kernspintomographie- Untersuchungen [Propofol for sedation in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging investigations. J Klin Padiatr 1999
  9. Kessler P. Intravenose sedierung von spontanatmenden Saulingen und Kleinkindern wahrend der Magnetresonanztomographie. Ein Verleich zwischen Propofol und Methohexital. Anaesthesist 1996
  10. D'Agostino J, Terndrup TE. Chloralhydrate versus midazolam for sedation of children for neuroimaging: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000
  11. Me CarverMay DG, Kang J, Aouthmany M, Elyon R, Mowery JL, Slovis TL, Kauffmann R. Comparison of chloral hydrate and midazolam for sedation of neonates for neuroimaging studies. J Pediatr 1996
  12. Schwengel D, Elwood T, Yaster M. Sedationfor radiology and radiation therapy. In: Yaster M, Krane EJ, Kaplan RP, Cote CJ, Lappe DG (eds). Pediatric Pain Management and Sedation Handbook. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1997:345-74. 13.Grounds RM, Lalor JM, Lumley J, Royston D, Morgan M. Propofol infusion for sedation in the intensive care unit: preliminary report. BMJ1987
  13. Sneyd JR, Carr A, Byrom WD. Bilski AJT. A metaanalysis of nausea and vomiting following maintenance of anesthesia with propofol or inhalation agents. Eur JAnaesthesiol 1998
  14. 43345. 15.Tomatir E, Atalay H, Gürses E, Kaplan L, Gönüllü M. Pediatrik manyetik rezonans g