Journals / Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of efficacy of caudal analgesia on pediatric surgery

Pediyatrik cerrahide kaudal analjezi etkinliğinin retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi

Pages
27–30
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No complications were noted in the postoperative period.Conclusion:It can be concluded that caudal block decreases the need for general anesthesia in the intraoperative period and provides effective analgesia in the postoperative period in operations on the inguinal, urogenital and rectal regions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective:We aimed to retrospectively evaluate analgesic effect and complications in intraoperative and post operative periods of caudal block performed after induction of general anesthesia in 125 pediatric patients who underwent elective surgical operations on the inguinal, urogenital and rectal regions in 2006.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods:Data were collected from anesthesia monitoring forms, recovery room monitoring forms and nursing monitoring forms about demographics, types of operations, anesthetic agents used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia, types of anesthesia, types, doses and concentrations of local anesthetics used for caudal block, analgesics given in intraoperative and postoperative periods, time of analgesic administration and complications.Results:The patients were aged 1-132 months, with a mean of 41.57±38.55 months.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No complications were noted in the postoperative period.Conclusion:It can be concluded that caudal block decreases the need for general anesthesia in the intraoperative period and provides effective analgesia in the postoperative period in operations on the inguinal, urogenital and rectal regions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective:We aimed to retrospectively evaluate analgesic effect and complications in intraoperative and post operative periods of caudal block performed after induction of general anesthesia in 125 pediatric patients who underwent elective surgical operations on the inguinal, urogenital and rectal regions in 2006. Material and Methods:Data were collected from anesthesia monitoring forms, recovery room monitoring forms and nursing monitoring forms about demographics, types of operations, anesthetic agents used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia, types of anesthesia, types, doses and concentrations of local anesthetics used for caudal block, analgesics given in intraoperative and postoperative periods, time of analgesic administration and complications.Results:The patients were aged 1-132 months, with a mean of 41.57±38.55 months. Out of 125 patients, 118 (94.4%) were male and 7 (5.6%) female with a mean weight of 14.60±7.81 kg. Duration of anesthesia was 61.50±42.07 min in patients administered 0.25% bubivacain for caudal block. No analgesics were administered during operation and mean duration of analgesia in the postoperative period was 412.88±163.13 min. No complications were noted in the postoperative period.Conclusion:It can be concluded that caudal block decreases the need for general anesthesia in the intraoperative period and provides effective analgesia in the postoperative period in operations on the inguinal, urogenital and rectal regions.

Özet

Amaç:Retrospektif olarak, hastanemizde 2006 yılının Ocak-Haziran ayları arasında, pediatrik cerrahide inguinal, ürogenital ve rektal bölgede elektif cerrahi operasyon geçirmiş 125 olguda genel anestezi indüksiyonu sonrasında yapılan kaudal bloğun, intraoperatif, postoperatif dönemde analjezik etkinliğini ve komplikasyonlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntem:Retrospektif olarak pediatrik cerrahide elektif cerrahi operesyon geçirmiş kaudal blok uygulanmış hasta dosyalarında yer alan anestezi izlem, anestezi derlenme odası hasta takip ve hemşire gözlem formları incelenerek, demografik veriler, operasyon türü, indüksiyon ve idamede uygulanan anestezik ajanlar, anestezi sekli, kaudal blokta uygulanan lokal anesteziğin türü, miktarı, konsantrasyonu; intraoperatif, postoperatif dönemde uygulanan analjezik ihtiyaçları ile verilme zamanları ve komplikasyonlar kaydedilmiştir.Bulgular:Yaş ortalamaları 41.57±38.55, yaş aralığı 1-132 ay olup, cinsiyet 118 erkek (%94.4) ve 7 kız (%5.6), vücut ağırlıkları ortalama 14.60±7.81 kg olarak bulundu. Kaudal blokla %0.25 bupivakainden 1ml/kg uygulanan hastaların anestezi süreleri ortalama 61.50±42.07 dak. olarak bulunmuştur. İntraoperatif dönemde herhangi bir analjezik yapılmamış olup postoperatif analjezi süreleri ortalama 412.88±163.13 dak. olarak saptanmıştır. Postoperatif dönemde herhangi bir komplikasyon bildirilmemiştir.Sonuç:Kaudal blok pediatrik cerrahide inguinal, ürogenital, rektal bölgede yapılan operasyonlarda intraoperatif ve postoperatif dönemde analjezi sağlamada etkili bir yöntem olduğunu gözlemledik.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, O. N., OĞURLU, M., ŞEN, S., GÜRSOY, F., UĞUR, B., GEZER, E. (2022). Evaluation of efficacy of caudal analgesia on pediatric surgery. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 27–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/429020

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, Salvo I. Caudal anaesthesia in pediatrics: an update. Minerva Anesthesiol 2006; 72; 453-9
  2. Kayhan Z., Klinik Anestezi, Logos Yayıncılık, Mayıs 2004. 3. baskı sayfa 694-5
  3. Dalens B, Hasnaoui A. Caudal anesthesia in pediatric surgery: success rate and adverse effects in 750 consecutive patients.Anesth Analg 1989: 68: 83-9
  4. Locatelli B, Ingelmo P, Sonzogni V, Zanella A, Gatti V, Spotti2 A, Di Marco S, Fumagalli R. Randomized, double-blind, phase III, controlled trial comparing levobupivacaine 0.25%, ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% by the caudal route in children. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 36671
  5. Giaufre E, Dalens B, Gombert A. Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists.Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 9412
  6. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP. Clinical Anesthesiology, İngilizce 3. baskıdan Türkçe'ye çevrilmiş, 3. baskı (çeviren: Tulunay M, Cuhruk H.) Güneş Kitabevi,Ankara, 2004; 273-4
  7. Tobias JD. Postoperative analgesia and intraoperative inhalational anesthetic requirements during umbilical herniorrhaphy in children: postincisional local infiltration versus preincisional caudal epidural block. J Clin Anesth. 1996; 8: 634-8
  8. Mazoit JX, Decaux A, Bouaziz H, Edouard A. Comparative ventricular electrophysiologic effect of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine on the isolated rabbit heart. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 78492
  9. Morrison SG, Dominguez JJ, Frascarolo P, Reiz S. A comparison of the electrocardiographic cardiotoxic effects of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anesthetized swine. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 130814
  10. Breschan C, Jost R, Krumphuolz R, Schaumberger F, Sttetner H, Marhofer P, Likar R. A prospective study comparing the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in pediatric patient undergoing caudal blockade. Pediatr Anaesth 2005; 15: 301-6
  11. Frawley GP, Downie S, Huang GH. Levobupivacaine caudal anesthesia in children a randomized double blind comparison with bupivacaine. Pediatr Anaesth 2006; 16: 754-60
  12. Johnston P, Findlow D, AldridgeLMet al. The effect of ketamine on 0.25% and 0.125% bupivacaine for caudal epidural blockade in children. Pediatr Anaesth 1999; 9: 31-4
  13. Gunter JB, Dunn CM, Bennie JB, Pentecost DL, Bower RJ, Ternberg JL. Optimum concentration of bupivacaine for combined caudal-gener