Journals / Adalet Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 66

Using Aİ in Judicial Proceedings – Will Aİ Be Able to Wear the Judge Robe

YARGI UYGULAMASINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ KULLANIMI – YAPAY ZEKÂ HÂKİM CÜBBESİNİ GİYEBİLECEK Mİ?

Pages
379–415
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All in all, AI boom will continue to affect legal practice as it does in other professions even if the law will be one of those sectors which will be affected less and later

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AI is one of the most popular topics in particular in the last decade even if it has an older history.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper tries to address AI from the law perspective to discover to what extent AI can be used in judicial practice from an assistant to a judge.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All in all, AI boom will continue to affect legal practice as it does in other professions even if the law will be one of those sectors which will be affected less and later
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

AI is one of the most popular topics in particular in the last decade even if it has an older history. This paper tries to address AI from the law perspective to discover to what extent AI can be used in judicial practice from an assistant to a judge. This paper anticipates that AI can be used in judicial practice by three options as AI assistant to judge, AI drafting decisions and AI deciding cases. Moreover, if AI is used in judicial practice, firstly it should have an ethical frame, as the ordinary legal actors have. Indeed, there are certain attempts for both to regulate AI, in general, and to create an ethical framework for the AI being used in legal practice even if they still remain at the initial stage. All in all, AI boom will continue to affect legal practice as it does in other professions even if the law will be one of those sectors which will be affected less and later

Özet

Yapay zekâ, daha eski bir geçmişe sahip olsa da özellikle son on yıldaki en popüler konulardan biridir. Bu çalışma, yapay zekânın yargı uygulamasında ne kadar kullanılabileceğini keşfetmek adına yapay zekâ kavramını hukuk perspektifinden ele almaya çalışmaktadır. Bu makale yapay zekânın yargı uygulamasında, hâkime yardımcı yapay zekâ, karar taslaklarını hazırlayan yapay zekâ ve karar veren yapay zekâ olarak üç şekilde kullanılabileceğini öngörmektedir. Yargı uygulamasında kullanılacak yapay zekâ ilk olarak bir etik çerçeveye sahip olmalıdır. Zira adil olma, ayrımcılık yasağı gibi hukuk sisteminin kurucu değerlerine uygun hareket edilmesi mevcut yargı aktörleri için de bir yükümlülüktür. Aslında, henüz başlangıç aşamasında olsalar da hukuki uygulamada kullanılacak yapay zekâ için hem düzenleme hem de etik bir çerçeve oluşturmaya dair çeşitli girişimler bulunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, yapay zekâ patlaması, her ne kadar hukuk olabildiğince geç etkilenecek sektörlerden biri olsa bile, diğer alanlarda olduğu gibi yargısal uygulamaları da etkilemeye devam edecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, O. G. (2022). Using Aİ in Judicial Proceedings – Will Aİ Be Able to Wear the Judge Robe. Adalet Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 66, 379–415. https://ajindex.com/articles/428087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Barfield Woodrow and Pagallo Ugo, Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018.
  2. Bramer Max and Petridis Miltos, Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV, Springer, Cham, 2016.
  3. Corrales Marcelo, Fenwick Mark and Forgo Nikolaus, Robotics AI and the Future of Law, Springer, Singapur, 2018.
  4. Rich Elaine, Knight Kevin and Nair Shivashankar B., Artificial Intelligence, Tata Mcgraw-Hill, New Delhi, 2009, 3. Bası. Russel Stuart and Norwig Peter, Artificial Intelligence A Modern Approach, Pearson, New Jersey, 2010, 3. Bası. Makaleler Barfield Woodrow, Towards a Law of Artificial Intelligence, in W. Barfield, U. Pagallo (eds) Research Hand Book on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, 2-39,
  5. Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018.
  6. Becerra Sergio David, The Rise of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Field: Where We Are and Where We Are Going, Pepperdine Law School the Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and the Law, C. 11, 27-52, 2018. Black’s Law Dictionary, 10th ed., Thomson Reuters, 2014.
  7. Buocz Thomas Julius, Artificial Intelligence in Court: Legitimacy Problems of AI Assistance in the Judiciary, Copenhagen Journal Of Legal Studies, C. 2 S. 1, 41-59, 2018.
  8. Burrell Jenna, How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms, Big Data & Society, C. 3 S. 1, 17-29, 2016, https://journals.sagepub. com/doi/full/10.1177/205395171562 2512 Etzioni Amitai and Etzioni Oren, Should Artificial Intelligence be Regulated, Issues in Science and Technology, C. 33, S. 4, 32-39, 2017, https://issues.org/perspective-should-artificial-intelligence-be-regulated/
  9. Etzioni Oren, Should AI Technology Be Regulated? Yes, and Here's How, Communications Of The ACM, C. 61, S. 12, 32-43, 2018, https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2018/12/232893-point-should-aitechnology-be-regulated/ful ltext Hallevy Gabriel, The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities - from Science Fiction to Legal Social Control, Akron Intellectual Property Journal, C. 4 S. 2, 171-204, 2010.
  10. Heaton Paul, Waggoner Ivan&Morikawa Jamie, Victim Compensation Funds and Tort Litigation Following Incidents of Mass Violence, Buffalo Law Review C. 63, S. 5 1265-1323, 2015.
  11. Kingston John, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability, in Max Bramer and Miltos Petridis (eds) Research And Development in Intelligent Systems XXXIII Incorporating Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems XXIV,