Journals / Adalet Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 66

Crispr Genom Editing Technologies: Patentability and Its Application to the Covid-19 Outbreak

CRISPR GENOM DÜZENLEME TEKNOLOJİLERİ: PATENTLENEBİLİRLİKLERİ VE COVID-19 SALGININDA KULLANIMI

Pages
227–292
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, uncertainties about the limits of the use of CRISPR technologies also require restrictions on the patenting of these technologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In October 2020, Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna were awarded the Nobel Prize for invention of CRISPR Cas9 technologies, also called "molecular scissors".
📊
Key Findings & Data:This new technology is also successfully used in the COVID-19 pandemic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, uncertainties about the limits of the use of CRISPR technologies also require restrictions on the patenting of these technologies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In October 2020, Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna were awarded the Nobel Prize for invention of CRISPR Cas9 technologies, also called "molecular scissors". After the emergence of these technologies, the last decade have witnessed an important patent race. The patenting of these new technologies is generally discussed in terms of the patentable subject matter and the criteria of ordre public/contrary to morality. On the other hand, it is generally accepted that these technologies contain novelty, inventive step and industrial application requirements. Therefore, the patent race is about the ownership of inventions, not the patentability of inventions. This new technology is also successfully used in the COVID-19 pandemic. However, uncertainties about the limits of the use of CRISPR technologies also require restrictions on the patenting of these technologies.

Özet

Ekim 2020’de Emmanuelle Charpentier ve Jennifer Doudna “moleküler makas” olarak da adlandırılan CRISPR/Cas9 teknolojilerine ilişkin buluşları nedeniyle Nobel Ödülü’ne layık görülmüşlerdir. Bu teknolojilerin ortaya çıkmasından sonra son on yıl önemli bir patent yarışına sahne olmaktadır. Bu yeni teknolojilerin patentlenmesi genel olarak buluş konusu ve kamu düzeni/ahlaka aykırılık ölçütleri yönünden tartışılmaktadır. Buna karşılık bu teknolojilerin yenilik içerdiği, buluş basamağı ve sanayiye uygulanabilir olduğu genel olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu nedenle patent yarışı, buluşların patentlenebilirliğine değil, buluşların sahipliğine ilişkin oluşmaktadır. Bu yeni teknolojiden COVID-19 pandemisinde de başarıyla faydalanılmaktadır. Ancak CRISPR teknolojilerinin kullanım alanının sınırları konusundaki belirsizlikler, bu teknolojilerin patentlenmesine yönelik sınırlamalar konulmasını da gerekli kılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYSAL, T. (2022). Crispr Genom Editing Technologies: Patentability and Its Application to the Covid-19 Outbreak. Adalet Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 66, 227–292. https://ajindex.com/articles/428084

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adcock, Mike; Llewellyn, Margaret, TRIPS and the patentability of microorganisms, BioScience Law Review, V. 4, I. 3, 2001.
  2. Akbudak, M. Aydın; Kontbay, Kübra; Yeni Nesil Genom Düzenleme Teknikleri: ZFN, TALEN, CRISPR'lar ve Bitkilerde Kullanımı, Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26, 1 (2017 (s. 111-126).
  3. Amardeep, Sharma, Zaidi, Kisa;Sharma, Shalu; Sharma, Vikas; Designer Nucleases for Genome Editing in Plants: Different Approaches and Applications, International Journal of Pure &Applied Bioscience, 5 (6), 2017, http://www.ijpab.com/form/2017%20Volume%205,%20issue%206/I JPAB-2017-5-6-1389-1402.pdf (Son Erişim Tarihi: 21.03.2021).
  4. Anderson, Kelly M.; Poosala, Pornthida; Lindley, Sean R.; Anderson, Douglas M.; Targeted Cleavage and Polyadenylation of RNA by CRISPR-Cas13, The Preprint Server for Biology, January 2019, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/531111v1.full.pdf (Son Erişim Tarihi: 24.02.2021).
  5. Attar, Azade, Gen Terapi Yöntemleri: Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Metodlar, Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 2017, 74 (1) (s. 103-112).
  6. Baer, Neal, Covid-19 is scarcy. Could a rogue scientist use CRISPR to conjure another pandemic, March 26,2020, https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/26/could-rogue-scientistuse-CRISPR-create-pandemic/ (Son Erişim Tarihi: 02.03.2021).
  7. Bent, Stephen A.; Sachwaab, Richard L.; Conlin, David G.; Jeffrey, Donald D.; Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology Worldwide, Stockton Press, 1987., s. 103. (Bent ve Diğerleri). Borella, Michael, The Zombie Apocalypse of Patent Eligibility Reform and a Possible Escape Route, February 4, 2020, https://www.patentdocs.org/patent_legislation/ (Son Erişim Tarihi: 17.02.2021).
  8. Bozkurt Yüksel, Armağan Ebru, Yapay Zekânın Buluşlarının Patentlenmesi, Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi, Y. 6, S. 11, Haziran 2018 (s. 585-622).
  9. Broughton, James P.; Deng, Xianding; Yu, Guixia; Servellita, Venice ve Diğerleri, CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2, April 2020, Nature Biotechnology, (870-874), https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-020-0513-4 (Son Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2021).
  10. Busby, Helen; Hervey, Tamara; Mohr, Alison, Ethical EU Law? The Influence of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, University of Leicester, Law Review, December 2008 (s. 803-842).
  11. Chauvin, Noah C., Custom-Edited DNA: Legal Limits on the Patentability of CRISPR-Cas9’s Therapeutic Applications, William & Mary Law Review, V. 60, I. 1, 2018 (s. 297-333).
  12. Chow, Ronald, Is it Time for Artificial In