Journals / Adalet Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 66

An Evaluation of the Uber’s Autonomous Car Crash in the Scope of Turkish Criminal Law

UBER’in Sürücüsüz Aracının Neden Olduğu Ölümlü Kazanın Türk Ceza Kanunu Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
315–332
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, the investigation stages carried out in the United States will also be mentioned in the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:New concepts and new problems occur as technology develops and for this reason, new solutions are being sought.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The concept of autonomous cars, which we have often heard about in recent years, and who will be held criminally responsible for fatal / injured traffic accidents caused by these vehicles are the questions of debate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, the investigation stages carried out in the United States will also be mentioned in the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Otonom Arabalar · Sürücüsüz Arabalar · Uber

Abstract

New concepts and new problems occur as technology develops and for this reason, new solutions are being sought. The concept of autonomous cars, which we have often heard about in recent years, and who will be held criminally responsible for fatal / injured traffic accidents caused by these vehicles are the questions of debate. The incident has been examined as it is the first example of the type of traffic accident that resulted in pedestrian’s death by an autonomous car. Considering that the fatal traffic accident occurred in Turkey, who would need to be held responsible regarding criminal law will be examined within the scope of the study. In this context, the investigation stages carried out in the United States will also be mentioned in the study.

Özet

Teknolojinin gelişmesi ile birlikte yeni kavramlar ve yeni sorunlar meydana gelmekte, bu sorunlara ise çözüm arayışı içine girilmektedir. Son yıllardır adını sıklıkla duyduğumuz otonom araç kavramı ve bu araçların karışmış olduğu ölümlü/yaralanmalı trafik kazalarında kimin/kimlerin cezai olarak sorumlu tutulacağı tartışma konusudur. Uber firmasına ait otonom aracın dâhil olduğu ve bir yayanın ölümüyle sonuçlanan trafik kazası türünün ilk örneği olması sebebiyle incelenmiştir. Söz konusu ölümlü trafik kazasının Türkiye’de meydana geldiği düşünüldüğünde kimin/kimlerin ceza hukuku açısından sorumlu tutulması gerektiği çalışmamız kapsamında incelenecektir. Bu kapsamda Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde sürdürülen soruşturma aşamalarına da ayrıca değinilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TIRTIR, M., ATEŞ, H. (2022). An Evaluation of the Uber’s Autonomous Car Crash in the Scope of Turkish Criminal Law. Adalet Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 66, 315–332. https://ajindex.com/articles/428074

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alexandra DeArman, “The Wild, Wild West: A Case Study of Self Driving Vehicle Testing in Arizona”, 61 Arizona Law Review. 983 (2019), 984-1012, (https://arizonalawreview.org/the-wild-wild-west-a-case-study-of-self-driving-vehicle-testing-in-arizona/,
  2. Online, Access Date: 20.02.2021)
  3. Artuk, Mehmet Emin /Gökcen, Ahmet/Alşahin, Mehmet Emin/Çakır,Kerim, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2020,14. Baskı,
  4. Aupperlee, Aaron, “Pittsburgh's Edge Case Research can simulate self-driving car 'nightmare scenario'”, 04.04.2018, (https://archive.triblive.com/business/technology/pittsburghs-edge-case-research-can-simulate-self-driving-car-nightmare-scenario/,
  5. Online, Access Date: 05.03.2021) Baker & McKenzie, Global Driverless Vehicle Survey 2018, (https://www.bakermckenzie.com/-/media/files/insight/publications/2018/03/global-driverless-vehicle-survey-2018/mm_global_driverlessvehiclesurvey2018_mar2018.pdf,
  6. Online, Access Date: 20.02.2021)
  7. Coppola, Chris/ Frank, BrieAnna J., “Report: Uber Driver Was Watching ‘The Voice’ Moments Before Fatal Tempe Crash”, AZCENTRAL (17.03.2021), (https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/tempe-breaking/2018/06/21/uber-self-driving-car-crash-tempe-police-elaine-herzberg/724344002/,
  8. Online, Access Date: 05.03.2021)
  9. De Bruyne, Jan / Vanleenhove, Cedric, “The Rise of Self-Driving Cars: Is the Private International Law Framework for non-contractual obligations posing a bump in the road?”, IALS Student Law Review. 5. (https://journals.sas.ac.uk/lawreview/article/view/2819,
  10. Online, Access Date: 20.02.2021) Executive Order 2018-04, Advancing Autonomous Vehicle Testing and Operating:Prioritizing Public Safety, State of Arizona, (https://apps.azdot.gov/files/sitefinity-files/Executive-Order-2018-04.pdf,
  11. Online, Access Date: 20.02.2021)
  12. Hilgendorf, Eric “Autonomous systems, artificial intelligence and robots: An orientation from a criminal law perspective?”, Journal of Law & Economic Regulation, Vol.12, No:2, (2019), 9-25
  13. Hilgendorf, Eric, “Automated Driving and the Law”, in Robotics, Autonomics, and the Law eds. Hilgendorf, Eric/Seidel, Uwe, Baden-Baden, Germany, Nomos, 2017, p.171-195 Ilková, Viktória/ Ilka, Adrian, “Legal aspects of autonomous vehicles – an overview (pre-print)”. 21st International Conference on Process Control (PC) June 6–9, 2017, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia,428-433 (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317580822_Legal_aspects_of_autonomous_vehicles_-_an_overview_pre-print,
  14. Online, Access Date: 20.02.2021)