Journals / Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

An unusual complication of clean intermittent self_catheterization; Urethral, glandular cavernosal tissue loss

Temiz aralıklı kateterizasyonunu alışılmadık bir komplikasyonu: Üretral, glandüler, kavernozal doku kaybı

Pages
47–48
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A case report of a patient, who lost urethral tissue and penile urethra due to CISC, a complication not reported previously in the literature is presented and CISC dependent urethral pathologies are reviewed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Clean intermittent self -catheterization (CISC) is a treatment method that is used routinely in individualized programmes for bladder evacuation in various bladder disorders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Urinary tract infection is the most frequent complication in patients performing CISC Although this method has significant advantages to indwelling catheters (IDC), because of repeatedly urethral catheterization, some complications like urethral stricture and urethral false passage may develop and the prevalence of urethral strictures and false passages increases with longer use of CISC.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A case report of a patient, who lost urethral tissue and penile urethra due to CISC, a complication not reported previously in the literature is presented and CISC dependent urethral pathologies are reviewed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Clean intermittent self -catheterization (CISC) is a treatment method that is used routinely in individualized programmes for bladder evacuation in various bladder disorders. Urinary tract infection is the most frequent complication in patients performing CISC Although this method has significant advantages to indwelling catheters (IDC), because of repeatedly urethral catheterization, some complications like urethral stricture and urethral false passage may develop and the prevalence of urethral strictures and false passages increases with longer use of CISC. A case report of a patient, who lost urethral tissue and penile urethra due to CISC, a complication not reported previously in the literature is presented and CISC dependent urethral pathologies are reviewed.

Özet

Temiz aralıklı kateterizaston (TAK), çeşitli mesane disfonksiyonlarında, bireylere özgü bir programla mesanenin boşaltılması için rutin olarak uzun yıllardır kullanılan bir tedavi metodudur. Üriner sistem enfeksiyonu TAK yapan hastalarda en sık görülen komplikasyondur. Daimi kateterizasyona göre bariz avantajları olmasına rağmen bu yöntemde, tekrarlayan üretral kateterizasyonlar sebebi ile üretra darlığı ve üretral yanlış yol gibi bir takım üretral komplikasyonlar gelişebilmektedir. Bu komplikasyonların (üretra darlığı ve üretral yanlış yol)prevelansı TAK'un uzun süre yapılmasıyla artmaktadır. Daha önce literatürde karşılaşılmayan bir TAK komplikasyonuna sahip, parsiyel penil doku ve penil üretra kaybı olan bir hastanın olgu sunumu yapıldı ve TAK'a bağlı gelişebilecek olan üretral patolojiler gözden geçirildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYUPEK, S., ÖZORAK, A., SEREL, T. A., ARMAĞAN, A., PERK, H., KOŞAAR, A. (2022). An unusual complication of clean intermittent self_catheterization; Urethral, glandular cavernosal tissue loss. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 47–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/420592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Woodward S, Rew M. Patients' quality of life and clean intermittent self-catheterization. Br J Nurs 2003; 12(18): 1066-74
  2. Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol. 1972;107(3): 458-61
  3. Bakke A, Digranes A, Hoisaeter PA. Physical predictors of infection in patients treated with clean intermittent catheterization: a prospective 7-year study. Br J Urol. 1997; 79(1): 85-90
  4. Perkash I, Giroux, J. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: a followup study. J Urol 1993; 149: 1068-71 5) Waller L, Jonsson O, Norlen L, Sullivan L. Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: longterm followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique. J Urol 1995;153: 345-8 6) Michielsen DP, Wyndaele JJ. Management of false passages in patients practising clean intermittent self catheterisation. Spinal Cord 1999; 37: 201-3
  5. Wyndaele JJ, Maes D. Clean intermittent selfcatheterization: a 12-year followup. J Urol 1990; 143: 906-8 8) Reisman EM, Preminger GM. Bladder perforation secondary to clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol 1989; 142(5): 1316-7
  6. Klein EA,Wood DP, Kay R: Retained straight catheter: complication of clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol. 1986 Apr; 135(4): 780-1.