Journals / Türkbilig / 2012 / Sayı: 24

Dravid Dilleri, Türkçe ve Sanskritçe sözlüksel karşılaştırmalar üzerine düşünceler

Some Thoughts on Dravidian-Turkic-Sanskrit lexical comparisons

Journal
Türkbilig
Pages
41–76
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, it is unclear how these lexical items should be dealt with, since authors supporting this borrowing route offer no clear picture of the exact nature of the historical setting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main goal of this paper is to analyze a specific group of Turkic lexical items whose historical destiny has been recently tied to the Dravidian languages.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper I hope to demonstrate that there is no such thing as Dravidian-Turkic direct contacts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, it is unclear how these lexical items should be dealt with, since authors supporting this borrowing route offer no clear picture of the exact nature of the historical setting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to analyze a specific group of Turkic lexical items whose historical destiny has been recently tied to the Dravidian languages. Overall, it is unclear how these lexical items should be dealt with, since authors supporting this borrowing route offer no clear picture of the exact nature of the historical setting. In this paper I hope to demonstrate that there is no such thing as Dravidian-Turkic direct contacts. Instead, more conventional borrowing routes, well-known in the specialized literature, might account for the majority of examples brought into discussion. Several other instances, however, must be regarded as cases that arise due to chance similarity. The bulk of evidence relies on both (pre)history and (historical) linguistics.

Özet

Bu yazının temel amacı yakın zamanda Dravidçe ile ilişkilendirilmiş olan bir grup Türkçe sözcüğü çözümlemektir. Böyle bir ödünçleme yolunu savunan araştırmacılar tarihi ortamın gerçek yapısı ile ilgili yeterince açıklayıcı olmadıkları için bu bağlantıların nasıl kurulduğu belirli değildir. Bu makalede Dravidçe ve Türkçe arasında doğrudan temasın / etkileşimin olmadığını göstermeyi umut ediyorum. Bunun yerine, ilgili yazında iyi bilinen daha geleneksel ödünçleme yolları tartışılan örnekleri açıklayabilir. Ancak diğer örnekler rastlantısal benzerliğe dayalı olarak ortaya çıkan durumlar olarak görülebilir. Kanıtların yada bulguların çoğu hem tarihe (tarihöncesine) hem de dilbilime (tarihsel dilbilime) dayanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

FUENTE, J. A. A. D. L. (2012). Dravid Dilleri, Türkçe ve Sanskritçe sözlüksel karşılaştırmalar üzerine düşünceler. Türkbilig, Sayı: 24, 41–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/418441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. DBIA = Emeneau, M. & Th. Burrow (1962): Dravidian Borrowings from Indo- Iranian. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. DEDR = Burrow, Th. & M.B. Emeneau (19842): A Dravidian Etymological Dictionary (Revised edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press. DTS = Nadeljaev, V.M., Nasilov, D.M., Tenišev, È.R. & A.M. Ščerbak (1969): Drevnetjurkskij slovar’. Leningrad: Nauka. DW(S) = Stachowski, M. (1993): Dolganischer Wortschatz. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka. (+ Dolganischer Wortschatz. Supplementband. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, 1998). EDT = Clauson, G., Sir (1972): An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-13th-Century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ÈSTJa = Sevortjan, È.V., ed. (1974-2003-): Ètimologičeskij slovar’ tjurkskix jazykov, vols. 1-7-. Moskva: Nauka. EWA = Mayrhofer, M. (1986-2000): Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen, 3 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. KEWA = Mayrhofer, M. (1956-1976): Kurzgefasstes etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. KW = Ramstedt, G. J. (1935): Kalmückisches Wörterbuch. Helsinki: Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae. MK = Dankoff R. & J. Kelly, eds. (1982-1985): Maḥmūd al-Kāšγarī’s Compendium of the Turkic Dialects. Dīwān Luγāt at-Turk, 3 vols. Cambridge: Harvard UPress. MT = Doerfer, G. (1985): Mongolo-Tungusica. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. SED = Monier-Williams, M. (1899): A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. TL = Vaiyapuri Pilla, S., ed. (1982[1924-36]): Tamil Lexicon, 6 vols. Madras: University of Madras. TMEN = Doerfer, G. (1963-1975): Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen, 4 vols. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner. SSTM = Cincius, V. I., ed. (1975-77): Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ tunguso-man’čžurskix jazykov, 2 vols. Leningrad: Nauka. VEWT = Räsänen, M. (1969): Versuch eines etymologischen Wörterbuchs der Türksprachen. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura. AALTO, P. (1971): «Iranian contacts of the Turks in Pre-Islamic Times». In: L. Ligeti (ed.), Studia Turcica, 29-37. Budapest: Akadémicai Kiadó. ALONSO DE LA FUENTE, J. A. (2007): «Some thoughts on Etruscan *maθ- ‘(honeyed) wine’». Historische Sprachforschung 120(1/2), 305-10.
  2. ANDRIOTIS, N. P. (1951): Dictionaire étymologique du grec moderne. Athènes: Institut Français d’Athènes. ANDRONOV, M. S. (1971): “Comparative studies on the nature of Dravido- Uralian parallels: A peep into the prehistory of language families”, In: R.E. Asher (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference-Seminar of Tamil Studies,