SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkbilig / 2014 / Sayı: 28

Takı and artokı on Words in the Old Uyghur Number System

ESKİ UYGURCA SAYI SİSTEMİNDE TAKI VE ARTOKI SÖZLERİ ÜZERİNE

HACER TOKYÜREK
Journal
Türkbilig
Pages
1–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Köktürk inscriptions used in number of compound systems, but the Yenisei tombstones not used, again early period Manichean and Buddhist texts of Uyghur limited number of used and Uyghur early period text that Maitreyasimit text used widely additional words in the number of compound systems suggests of foreign effect, especially Tocharian Language effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Additional words used in number of compound systems in Köktürk and Uyghur period can be as caused by the origin of language, effect of foreign languages especially Tocharian language.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additional words used in number of compound systems in Köktürk and Uyghur period can be as caused by the origin of language, effect of foreign languages especially Tocharian language.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Köktürk inscriptions used in number of compound systems, but the Yenisei tombstones not used, again early period Manichean and Buddhist texts of Uyghur limited number of used and Uyghur early period text that Maitreyasimit text used widely additional words in the number of compound systems suggests of foreign effect, especially Tocharian Language effect.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Additional words used in number of compound systems in Köktürk and Uyghur period can be as caused by the origin of language, effect of foreign languages especially Tocharian language. Köktürk inscriptions used in number of compound systems, but the Yenisei tombstones not used, again early period Manichean and Buddhist texts of Uyghur limited number of used and Uyghur early period text that Maitreyasimit text used widely additional words in the number of compound systems suggests of foreign effect, especially Tocharian Language effect.

Özet

Köktürk ve Uygur dönemi birleşik sayı sisteminde kullanılan ilave sözler, dilin kendi bünyesinde olabileceği gibi yabancı dillerin özellikle de Toharcanın etkisinden de kaynaklanabilir. Köktürk yazıtları birleşik sayı sisteminde kullanılan, fakat Yenisey mezar taşlarında kullanılmayan yine Uygurcanın erken dönem Mani ve Buddha metinlerinde sınırlı sayıda kullanılan ve yine Uygurcanın erken dönem metni olan Maitreyasimit metninde yaygın kullanılan birleşik sayılardaki ilave sözler, yabancı etkiyi özellikle de Tohar etkisini düşündürmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKYÜREK, H. (2014). Takı and artokı on Words in the Old Uyghur Number System. Türkbilig, Sayı: 28, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/418403

References (3)

  1. AĞCA, Ferruh (2006). Eski Uygur Türkçesiyle Yazılmış Eserlerin Ses ve Şekil Özelliklerine Göre Tarihlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). ASMUSSEN, Jess P. (1965). Huastvanift, Studies in Maicheism. Copenhagen. AYDEMİR, Hakan (2009). “Bemerkungen zu den Tocharisch-Türkischen und Tocharisch- Uigurischen Beziehungen (türkisch twqry, sogdisch twγr’k, persisch t(u)ġr(a)q)”. Journal of Oriental and African Studies. Volume 18, Athens-Greece: 159-181. BACANLI, Eyüp (2012). “Geçmişten Günümüze Türkçenin Sayıları ve Sayı Sistemi”, Bilim ve Teknik: 76-78. BOZKURT, Fuat (2002). Türklerin Dili, Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yay. CHAMBERLAIN, Basil Hall (2013). A Simplified Gramma of The Japanese Language Languages Written Style, Forgotten Books. CLAUSON, Sir Gerard (1959). “The Turkish Numerals”. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, No. 1/2: 19-31. DAŞDEMİR, Muharrem (2013). “Türkçede Miktar ve Sayı Sistemi”. Turkish Studies- International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 8/13: 309-336. ECKMANN, Janos (2003). Çağatayca El Kitabı. (Çeviren: Günay KARAAĞAÇ), Ankara: Akçağ Yay. EHLERS, Gerhard (1983). “Notabilia zur alttürkischen Oberstufenzählung”. In: UAJb, N.F.3,81-87. EMMERICK, Ronald (1992). ‘Iranian’. In: Indo-European Numerals (Ed. Jadranka GVOZDANOVİĆ), Walter de Gruyter. Berlin. ERASLAN, Kemal (2012). Eski Uygur Türkçesi Grameri, Ankara: TDK Yay. ERCİLASUN, Ahmet Bican (2007). “Askerlikte Onlu Sisteme Türklerin Katkıları”, Makaleler, Dil-Destan-Tarih-Edebiyat, Hazırlayan: Ekrem ARIKOĞLU, Ankara: Akçağ Yay. ERDAL, Marcel (2004). A Grammar of Old Turkic, Brill, Leiden-Boston. ERSOY, Feyzi (2007). “Çuvaş Türkçesi”. Türk Lehçeleri Grameri, Ed. Ahmet B. ERCİLASUN, Ankara: Akçağ Yay. GABAIN, A. von (2000): Eski Türkçenin Grameri, (Çeviren: Mehmet AKALIN). Ankara: TDK Yay. GEMALMAZ, Efrasiyap (2010). “Türkçede Sayı Sisteminin Derin Yapısı; \'/Bir/\'in ve \'/Sıfır/\'ın Alomorfları Olarak ‘\'Øn/\'\'\'. Türkçenin Derin Yapısı. Haz. Cengiz ALYILMAZ-Osman MERT. Ankara. GENG Shimin, Hans-Joachim KLIMKEIT (1988). Das Zusammentreffen Mit Maitreya. Die ersten fünf Kapitel der Hami-Version der Maitrisimit, Zusammenarbeit mit Kelmut Eimer und Jens Peter Laut hrsg., übersetzt und kommentiert
  2. Text, Übersetzung und Kommentear
  3. Faksimiles und Indices. Wiesbaden. (AF. 103.). GENG Shimin, Hans-Joachim KLIMKEIT, Jens Peter LAUT (1988). “Das Erscheinen des Bodhisattva, Da