SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

The Impact of Regional Splitting and Local Taxes on Local Government Spending in Indonesia

Roosemarina Anggraini RAMBE
Pages
74–88
Publication Date
2021-10-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the split local government spending is significantly greater than un-split local government in five regions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to analyze the variables of regional splitting status, local taxes, GRDP, and population as determinants of local government spending in six regions in Indonesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analytical method used was panel data regression, with data obtained from the 2006-2017 research period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the split local government spending is significantly greater than un-split local government in five regions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Local Government Spending · Regional Splitting · Tax Revenue

Özet

This study aims to analyze the variables of regional splitting status, local taxes, GRDP, and population as determinants of local government spending in six regions in Indonesia. The analytical method used was panel data regression, with data obtained from the 2006-2017 research period. The results showed that the split local government spending is significantly greater than un-split local government in five regions. Furthermore, population and GRDP have a significant and positive effect on local government spending in all regions. Meanwhile, local taxes have a positive effect on local government spending only in four regions. Therefore, the government is expected to evaluate the implementation of regional splitting, create regulations, a conducive business climate, and maintain the population growth rate in all regions to properly maintain the increase in local government spending.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAMBE, R. A. (2021). The Impact of Regional Splitting and Local Taxes on Local Government Spending in Indonesia. Anadolu İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 74–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/416589

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Afonso, A., & Rault, C. (2008). Bootstrap Panel Granger-causality Between Government Spending and Revenue. WP 39/2008/DE/UECE Working Paper ISSN No 0874-4548.
  2. Aisha, Z., & Khatoon, S. (2009). Government expenditure and tax revenue, causality and cointegration: The experience of Pakistan (1972-2007). Pakistan Development Review, 48(4), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.30541/v48i4iipp.951-959
  3. Akca, N., Sönmez, S., & Yılmaz, A. (2017). Determinants of health expenditure in OECD countries: A decision tree model. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(6), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.336.13300
  4. Akinlo, A. E. (2013). Government Spending and National Income Nexus for Nigeria. Global Journal of Business Research, 7(1), 33–41.
  5. Antonis, A., Constantinos, K., & Persefoni, T. (2013). Wagner’s Law versus Keynesian Hypothesis: Evidence from pre-WWII Greece. Panoeconomicus, 60(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1304457A
  6. Apergis, N., Payne, J. E., & Saunoris, J. W. (2012). Tax-spend nexus in Greece: Are there asymmetries? Journal of Economic Studies, 39(3), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443581211245900
  7. Baltagi, B. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed., Vol. 5, Issue 7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Breunig, R., & Rocaboy, Y. (2008). Per-capita public expenditures and population size: A non-parametric analysis using French data. Public Choice, 136(3–4), 429–445.
  8. Cai, Y., Feng, W., & Shen, K. (2018). Fiscal Implications of Population Aging and Social Sector Expenditure in China. Population and Development Review, 44(4), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12206
  9. Chang, T., Liu, W. R., & Caudill, S. B. (2002). Tax-and-spend, spend-and-tax, or fiscal synchronization: New evidence for ten countries. Applied Economics, 34(12), 1553–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840110103265
  10. Friedman, M. (1978). The Limitations of Tax Limitation. Policy Review, Summer, 7–14.
  11. Garcia, M. J. (2012). The Revenues-Expenditures Nexus: a Panel Data Analysis of Spain’s Regions. 1(1), 24–38.
  12. Gujarati, D. (2003). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill. Gurdal, T., Aydin, M., & Inal, V. (2021). The relationship between tax revenue, government expenditure, and economic growth in G7 countries: new evidence from time and frequency domain approaches. In Economic Change and Restructuring (Vol. 54, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09280-x
  13. Islam, A. M. (2001). Wagner’s law revisited: Cointegration and exogeneity tests for the USA. Applied Economics Letters, 8(8),