Journals / Anadolu İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Poisson Count Model to Explain Gender Dynamics of Farmer Adoption of Climate Smart Agricultural Practices

Pages
49–69
Publication Date
2020-10-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Given that women farmers in developing countries are not permitted to own large farms, it is recommended that government considers land reforms that would enable women farmers have more access to large farms to improve their adoption of climate smart agricultural practices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Climate smart agricultural practices are important interventions for addressing effects of climate change in agricultural production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using a sample of 105 maize farmers, the econometric modelling revealed that men farmers’ adoption of climate smart agricultural practices is affected by their educational level and climate related shock.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Given that women farmers in developing countries are not permitted to own large farms, it is recommended that government considers land reforms that would enable women farmers have more access to large farms to improve their adoption of climate smart agricultural practices.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:climate change · gender · adoption

Özet

Climate smart agricultural practices are important interventions for addressing effects of climate change in agricultural production. In this paper, a Poisson count regression model is employed to examine multiple factors that drive both men and women farmers’ adoption of climate smart agricultural practices. Using a sample of 105 maize farmers, the econometric modelling revealed that men farmers’ adoption of climate smart agricultural practices is affected by their educational level and climate related shock. Also, men and women farmers adoption of climate smart agricultural practices is influenced by farm size. Given that women farmers in developing countries are not permitted to own large farms, it is recommended that government considers land reforms that would enable women farmers have more access to large farms to improve their adoption of climate smart agricultural practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

OWUSU, R. (2020). Poisson Count Model to Explain Gender Dynamics of Farmer Adoption of Climate Smart Agricultural Practices. Anadolu İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 49–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/416571

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acquah, H. D. (2011). Farmers perception and adaptation to climate change: A willingness to pay analysis. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 13(5), 150–161.
  2. Adger, W. N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conway, D., & Hulme, M. (2003). Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Progress in Development Studies, 3(3), 179–195.
  3. Akudugu, M. A., Dittoh, S., & Mahama, E. S. (2012). The implications of climate change on food security and rural livelihoods: Experiences from Northern Ghana. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 2(3), 21–29.
  4. Alston, M. (2014). Gender mainstreaming and climate change. Women’s Studies International Forum, 47, 287–294.
  5. Elsevier. Amfo-Otu, R., & Doo, I. A. (2015). Hospital solid waste management at Tetteh Quarshie Memorial Hospital, Akuapem-Mampong, Ghana. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 16(4), 305–314.
  6. Andersen, L. E., Verner, D., & Wiebelt, M. (2017). Gender and Climate Change in Latin America: An analysis of vulnerability, adaptation and resilience based on household surveys. Journal of International Development, 29(7), 857–876.
  7. Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744–751.
  8. Aryal, J. P., Rahut, D. B., Maharjan, S., & Erenstein, O. (2018). Factors affecting the adoption of multiple climate-smart agricultural practices in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Natural Resources Forum, 42, 141–158.
  9. Wiley Online Library. Below, T. B., Mutabazi, K. D., Kirschke, D., Franke, C., Sieber, S., Siebert, R., & Tscherning, K. (2012). Can farmers’ adaptation to climate change be explained by socio-economic household-level variables? Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 223–235.
  10. Bryan, E., Bernier, Q., Espinal, M., & Ringler, C. (2018). Making climate change adaptation programmes in sub-Saharan Africa more gender responsive: Insights from implementing organizations on the barriers and opportunities. Climate and Development, 10(5), 417–431.
  11. Bryan, E., Deressa, T. T., Gbetibouo, G. A., & Ringler, C. (2009). Adaptation to climate change in Ethiopia and South Africa: Options and constraints. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(4), 413–426.
  12. Change, I. C. (2014). Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1454. Conley, T. G., & Udry, C. R. (2010). Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. American Economic Revie