Journals / Ege Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Axillary nerve involvement in hemiplegia

Pages
19–25
Publication Date
2019-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Detecting shoulder subluxation and additional axillary nerve injury could in help planning an appropriate rehabilitation program and contribute to functional recovery by preventing complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT Objective: Brachial plexus and peripheric nerves of the upper extremities can be damaged in hemiplegic shoulder subluxation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The latency of the axillary nerves of the hemiplegic sides (4.,2±0.,75 msn) was prolonged when compared to that of the normal sides (3.,7±0.,7 msn), and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.,001).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Detecting shoulder subluxation and additional axillary nerve injury could in help planning an appropriate rehabilitation program and contribute to functional recovery by preventing complications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stroke · Axillary Nerve · Rehabilitation

Özet

ABSTRACT Objective: Brachial plexus and peripheric nerves of the upper extremities can be damaged in hemiplegic shoulder subluxation. This study aimed to determine the relationship between shoulder subluxation and axillary nerve injury.Methods: Sixty patients with stroke were included in the study. The Brunnstrom Scale and the Ashworth Scale were used to evaluate the motor and muscle tone, respectively. Functional evaluation was performed with the Fugl–Meyer Scale and the Stroke Impairment Assessment Set . The Van Langenberghe method was used to grade shoulder subluxation on anterior-posterior shoulder X-ray. Latencies and amplitudes of the axillary nerves of the normal and hemiplegic sides were compared using electromyographs. Results: The latency of the axillary nerves of the hemiplegic sides (4.,2±0.,75 msn) was prolonged when compared to that of the normal sides (3.,7±0.,7 msn), and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.,001). The amplitudes of the compound muscle action potential of the hemiplegic sides (4.,1±4.,22 mv) lower than that of the normal sides (6.,1±6.,57 mv) (P<0.,001). Conclusions: Shoulder subluxation may cause injury not only to the axillary nerve but also to other peripheric nerves and the brachial plexus. Detecting shoulder subluxation and additional axillary nerve injury could in help planning an appropriate rehabilitation program and contribute to functional recovery by preventing complications.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, N., MANDIROĞLU, S., ALEMDAROĞLU, E., UÇAN, H., GÖKKAYA, N. K. O. (2019). Axillary nerve involvement in hemiplegia. Ege Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 19–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/415903

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. REFERENCES REFERANCE 1. Stein J, Harvey RL, Macko RF, Winstein CJ, Zorowitz RD. Stroke recovery and rehabilitation: Çeviri: Arasıl T, Öztürk EA. İnme İyileşmesi ve Rehabilitasyonu. 1st Edd. Pelikan Yayıncılık. Ankara. 2012: p.31-44. REFERANCE 2. Uzunca K. Iİnmede Üst Ekstremite Komplikasyonlari ı. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg 2006; 52(ÖzelEk B) 2003;6:39-45. REFERANCE 3. Aras M, Çakıcı A. İnme Rehabilitasyonu. 2nd Edd. Oğuz H, Dursun E, Dursun N. Nobel matbaacılık. İstanbul. 2004. p.589-626. REFERANCE 4. Basmajian JV. Muscles Alive: their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1978. REFERANCE 5. Chino N. Electrophysiological investigation on shoulder subluxation in hemiplegics. Scand J Rehab med 1981; 13: 17-21. REFERANCE 6. Griffin JW. Hemiplegic shoulder pain. Phys Ther. 1986; 66:1884-93. REFERANCE 7. Tsur A, Ring H. Axillary nerve conduction changes in hemiplegia. Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2008; 2: 26. REFERANCE 8. Chaco J, Wolf E. Subluxation of the glenohumeral joint in hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med. 1971; 50:139-43. REFERANCE 9. Van Ouwenaller C, Laplace PM, Chantraine A. Painful shoulder in hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986; 67:23-6. REFERANCE 10. Ikai T, Tei K, Yoshida K, Miyano S, Yonemoto K. Evaluation and treatment of shoulder subluxation in hemiplegia: relationship between subluxation and pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77: 421-426. REFERANCE 11. Paci M, Nannetti L, Rinaldi LA. Glenohumeral subluxation in hemiplegia. Physiother Res Int. 2007; 12: 95-104. REFERANCE 12. Van Langenberghe HV, Hogan BM. Degree of pain and grade of subluxation in the painful hemiplegic shoulder. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988; 20: 161-166.REFERANCE 13. Duncan PW, Propst M,Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Mayer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery Following Cerebrovasküler Accident. REFERANCE 14. Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl Mayer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Arh Phys Med Rehab. 2006; 87: 962-966. REFERANCE 15. Chıno N,Sonoda S,Domen K,Saitoh E,Kimura A. Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). A new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Jpn J Rehabil Med 1994; 31: 119-125. REFERANCE 16. Gregson J, Leathley M, Moore A et al. Reliability of tone assessment scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing post stroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehab il 1999; 80: 1013-1016. REFERANCE 17. Shin j.O