Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Half Fluence - Full Dose and Half Dose - Full Fluence Photodynamic Therapy in Eyes with Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Pages
123–130
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on these results, we observed t hat the number of PDT relapses can be related to the dose amount.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare half fluence-full dose and half dose- full fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) regarding visual acuity and anatomic changes in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 60 patients with chronic CSCR patients who underwent half fluence- full dose (group 1, 30 patients) or half dose- full fluence (group 2, 30 patients).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on these results, we observed t hat the number of PDT relapses can be related to the dose amount.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose: To compare half fluence-full dose and half dose- full fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) regarding visual acuity and anatomic changes in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 60 patients with chronic CSCR patients who underwent half fluence- full dose (group 1, 30 patients) or half dose- full fluence (group 2, 30 patients). The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), serous retinal detachment (SRD) and retina pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were compa red between the groups at baseline, on months 1, 3, 6 and 12 during follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 12 months in both groups. The mean number of repeated PDTs following first PDT was 0.48 ± 0.20 (range, 0-2) in the group 1 and 1.09 ± 0.80 (range, 0-3) in the group 2 during 12-months follow-up (p = 0.031). In Group 1 , BCVA was increased from 0.69 ± 0.28 logMAR (logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) at baseline to 0.20 ± 0.18 logMAR on month 12 (p 0.05). In the study, number of PDTs were increased by decreasing doses administered in PDT (r = -0.339, p =0.008). In both groups, no PDT-related complication was observed. Conclusion: Both half fluence-full dose and half dose-full fluence PDT were effective in the treatment of chronic CSCR. No signi ficant difference was observed in visual or anatomical outcomes between groups. Although no systemic complications developed depending on the PDT dose, the number of relapses increased by reducing amount of doses. amount decreased. Based on these results, we observed t hat the number of PDT relapses can be related to the dose amount.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARASU, B., YÜCEL, Ö. (2021). Comparison of Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Half Fluence - Full Dose and Half Dose - Full Fluence Photodynamic Therapy in Eyes with Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 123–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/413573

References (15)

  1. Geli şken Ö, Yilmaz S, Kaderli B.Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Journal of Retina-Vitreous 2007, 15;1
  2. Spitznas M, Huke J. Number, shape, and topography of leakage points in acute type I central serous retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1987; 225: 437-40
  3. R. Levine AJB, F. Robinson. Long- term follow-up of idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy by fluorescein angiography. Ophthalmology 1989;96:854-9
  4. Güven D, Aksünger A, Meral OR, et al. Fundus Fluorescein Angiographic Patterns In Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Journal of Retina-Vitreous 1994, 2;2
  5. Türkçüo ğlu P, Yilmaz T, Turgut B, et al. Unusual Fundus Fluorescein Angiography Findings in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Journal of Retina-Vitreous 2007, 15;3
  6. Yamada K, Hayasaka S, Setogawa T. Fluorescein angiographic patterns in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy at the initial visit. Ophthalmologica 1992; 205: 69-76
  7. Demircan N, Anli A, Soylu M, et al. Clinic Findings and Prognosis in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. Journal of Retina-Vitreous 1996, 4;1
  8. Spaide RF, Hall L, Haas A, et al. Indocyanine green videoangiography of older patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 1996;16:203-1
  9. Gass JD. Pathogenesis of disciform detachment of the neuroepithelium. II. Idiopathic central serous choroidopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1967;63:587-615
  10. Iida T, Kishi S, Hagimura N, et al. Persistent and bilateral choroidal vascular abnormalities in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina 1999;19:508-12
  11. Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:496-500
  12. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Hasan T. Mechanisms of action of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for the treatment of age- related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:195- 214. 13. van Rijssen TJ, van Dijk EHC, Yzer S, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy: Towards an evidence-based treatment guideline. Prog Retin Eye Res 2019;73:100770
  13. Cardillo Piccolino F, Eandi CM, Ventre L, et al. Photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.Retina 2003;23:752-63
  14. Chan WM, Lai TY, Lai RY, et al. Safety enhanced photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: one-year results of a prospective study. Retina 2008;28:85-93
  15. Chan WM, Lai TY, Lai RY, et al. Half-dose vertepor fin photodynamic therapy for acute central serous chorioretinopathy: one-year res