Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combined with Photodynamic Therapy Versus Solely Performing Anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Eyes with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Pages
47–54
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In group 1, BCVA decreased from the logarithm of the minimum angle resolution (log MAR) of 0.59 ± 0.39 to 0.70 ± 0.41 log MAR in the fi nal examination (p = 0.016), CMT initial 355.562 ± 95.54 μm decreased from to 296,76 ± 105,03 μm at the last examination (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare visual and anatomical results of anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) versus only performing anti- VEGF therapy in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 60 PCV patients who underwent anti- VEGF combined with PDT (Group 1) or solely performing anti- VEGF therapy (Group 2) were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In group 1, BCVA decreased from the logarithm of the minimum angle resolution (log MAR) of 0.59 ± 0.39 to 0.70 ± 0.41 log MAR in the fi nal examination (p = 0.016), CMT initial 355.562 ± 95.54 μm decreased from to 296,76 ± 105,03 μm at the last examination (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual and anatomical results of anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT) versus only performing anti- VEGF therapy in eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of 60 PCV patients who underwent anti- VEGF combined with PDT (Group 1) or solely performing anti- VEGF therapy (Group 2) were enrolled. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), presence of subretinal fl uid (SF) were compared among the groups during the follow-up periods at baseline, 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month, 9th month, 12th month,18th month, 24th month and fi nal visit, respectively. Results: The mean age of the patients was 71.96 ± 8.50 years (range, 52-88 years), and the mean follow-up period was 53.83 ± 14.86 (range, 20-85 months). The mean number of injections was observed as 10.56 ± 1.88 (range, 7 -15) in the fi rst group and 11.83 ± 2.61 (range, 7 - 17) in the second group, respectively (p = 0.039). In group 1, BCVA decreased from the logarithm of the minimum angle resolution (log MAR) of 0.59 ± 0.39 to 0.70 ± 0.41 log MAR in the fi nal examination (p = 0.016), CMT initial 355.562 ± 95.54 μm decreased from to 296,76 ± 105,03 μm at the last examination (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARTUNAY, Ö., KARASU, B. (2022). Comparison of Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combined with Photodynamic Therapy Versus Solely Performing Anti- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Eyes with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 47–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/589056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Spaide RF, Yannuzzi LA, Slakter JS, et al. Indocyanine green videoangiography of idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina 15:100-10, 1995
  2. Yannuzzi LA, Sorenson J, Spaide RF, et al. Idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV). Retina 32;1:1-8, 2012
  3. Yannuzzi LA, Ciardella A, Spaide RF, et al. The expanding clinical spectrum of idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 115:478-85, 1997
  4. Uyama M, Wada M, Nagai Y, et al. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: natural history. Am J Ophthalmol 133: 639-648, 2002
  5. Koh AH; Expert PCV Panel, Chen LJ, Chen SJ, et al. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: Evidence-based guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Retina 2013;33:686-716
  6. Romano MR, Cipollone U, Semeraro F, et al. Combined photodynamic therapy and intravitreal bevacizumab for idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: oneyear followup. Clin Ophthalmol 2010; 4:1237-1241
  7. Sato T, Kishi S, Matsumoto H, et al. Combined photodynamic therapy with verteporfi n and intravitreal bevacizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149(6):947-954
  8. Gomi F, Sawa M, Wakabayashi T, et al. Effi cacy of intravitreal bevacizumab combined with photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150(1):48-54
  9. Zuo C, Wen F, Li J, et al. Transitions of multifocal electroretinography following combined intravitreal bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Doc Ophthalmol 2009;119(1):29-36
  10. Moon SW, Kim MS, Kim ES, et al. Photodynamic therapy combined with intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor antibody for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Ophthalmologica 2011;225(3):169-175
  11. Ruamviboonsuk P, Tadarati M, Vanichvaranont S, et al. Photodynamic therapy combined with ranibizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: results of a 1-year preliminary study. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94(8):1045- 1051
  12. Kurashige Y, Otani A, Sasahara M, et al.Two-year results of photodynamic therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146(4):513-519
  13. Tsuchiya D, Yamamoto T, Kawasaki R, et al. Twoyear visual outcomes after photodynamic therapy in agerelated macular degeneration patients with or without polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy lesions. Retina 2009; 29(7):960-965
  14. Akaza E, Mori R, Yuzawa M. Long-term results of photodynamic therapy of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Retina 2008;2