Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy on Grid Laser Photocoagulation Combined with Aflibercept and Ranibizumab as Pro re Nata Regimen for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Pages
15–23
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean CFT decreased from baseline to final visit were 537.40 ± 181.84 μm to 266.43 ± 51.89 μm in the IVA group, and 528.94 ± 177.52 μm to 312.59 ± 78.15 μm in the IVR group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of grid laser photocoagulation (GLP) with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) versus ranibizumab (IVR) on eyes with macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 139 patients (139 naive eyes) with ME caused by BRVO which was received therapy for IVA combined with GLP (72 eyes) against IVR combined with GLP (67 eyes), retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean CFT decreased from baseline to final visit were 537.40 ± 181.84 μm to 266.43 ± 51.89 μm in the IVA group, and 528.94 ± 177.52 μm to 312.59 ± 78.15 μm in the IVR group (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of grid laser photocoagulation (GLP) with intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) versus ranibizumab (IVR) on eyes with macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: A total of 139 patients (139 naive eyes) with ME caused by BRVO which was received therapy for IVA combined with GLP (72 eyes) against IVR combined with GLP (67 eyes), retrospectively reviewed. Main outcomes for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), central foveal volume (CFV) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were recorded from baseline to final visit. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were used to show anatomic findings. GLP was implemented over the focal leaks seen on the FFA that used a 532 nm diode laser system. BRVO was classified as ischemic and non- ischemic according to FFA findings. Results: The mean age was 65.49 ± 9.59 years (range; 45 - 87 years) and mean follow-up time was 37.95 ± 13.29 months (range; 13 - 60 months). Average IVA and IVR injection counts from baseline to final visit were 3.84 ± 1.85 (range; 1 to 9) and, 4.89 ± 2.49 (range; 1 to 10) respectively (p=0.011). Mean counts of GLP in IVA and IVR groups from baseline to final visit were 3.4 ± 1.2 (range; 2 to 8) and, 3.5 ± 1.1 (range; 2 to 7), respectively (p=0.610). The mean CFT decreased from baseline to final visit were 537.40 ± 181.84 μm to 266.43 ± 51.89 μm in the IVA group, and 528.94 ± 177.52 μm to 312.59 ± 78.15 μm in the IVR group (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Karasu, B., Aykut, A. (2022). Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy on Grid Laser Photocoagulation Combined with Aflibercept and Ranibizumab as Pro re Nata Regimen for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 15–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/589005

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Scott IU, VanVeldhuisen PC, Oden NL, et al. SCORE Study Investigator Group. SCORE Study Report 1: baseline association between central retinal thickness and visual acuity in patients with retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 504-12
  2. Rehak J, Rehak M. Branch retinal vein occlusion: pathogenesis, visual prognosis, and treatment modalities. Curr Eye Res 2008; 33: 111-31
  3. McIntosh RL, Mohamed Q, Saw SM, et al. Interventions for branch retinal vein occlusion: an evidence-based systematic review. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 835-54
  4. H. Gerding. Results of a Meta-Analysis on Intravitreal anti- VEGF Treatment of Macular Oedema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. (2017) Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 234: 551-555
  5. Bajor A, Pielen A, Danzmann L. Retinal Vein Occlusion - Which Treatment When? Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2017; 234(10):1259-1265
  6. Phillips S, Fekrat S, Finkelstein D. Branch retinal vein occlusion. In: Ryan SJ, editor. Retina 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby. 2006; 1349- 1354
  7. Lang GE, Lang SJ. Retinal Vein Occlusions. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2018; 235:1297-1315
  8. Battaglia Parodi M, Saviano S, G Ravalico. Grid laser treatment in macular branch retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999; 237:1024-7
  9. Acar DA, Ünlü N, Hazırolan D, et al. Macular Grid Laser Photocoagulation Treatment Versus Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. Journal of Retina-Vitreous 2011; Vol 19; Num 1
  10. Scott IU, Ip MS, VanVeldhuisen PC, et al. SCORE Study Research Group. A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with standard care to treat vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127:1115-28
  11. Jaissle GB, Szurman P, Feltgen N, et al. Predictive factors for functional improvement after intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249:183-92
  12. Kaldırım H, Kırgız A, Atalay K, et al. Comparison of Effi cacy of Three Different Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents in Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal vein Occlusion. Journal of Retina-Vitreous 2019; Vol 28; Num 1
  13. Wu L, Arevalo JF, Berrocal MH, et al. Comparison of two doses of intravitreal bevacizumab as primary treatment for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein