SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6

Comparison of success between external andendonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in primary acquirednasolacrimal duct obstruction in Turkish cohort

Erdem ERİS
Ali Rıza Cenk ÇELEBİ
Buğra KARASU
İrfan PERENTE
Gülünay KİRAY
Pages
579–584
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although the success of external DCR is higher and the recurrence is lower than endoscopic DCR, with the outcomes of this study, endoscopic DCR can be tried as the first choice to protect the patient from major surgery and anesthesia in PANDO.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results and recurrence rates of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) in Turkish Cohort.METHODS: Medical records were reviewed in all patients who underwent surgery for PANDO between January 2010 and September 2014 in a tertiary university hospital retrospectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lacrimal drainage system and recurrence rates were recorded.RESULTS: This study was conducted in 81 patients, 27 of whom were men (33.3%) and 54 were women (66.7%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although the success of external DCR is higher and the recurrence is lower than endoscopic DCR, with the outcomes of this study, endoscopic DCR can be tried as the first choice to protect the patient from major surgery and anesthesia in PANDO.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results and recurrence rates of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) in Turkish Cohort.METHODS: Medical records were reviewed in all patients who underwent surgery for PANDO between January 2010 and September 2014 in a tertiary university hospital retrospectively. The patients were followed up on the first day, first month, third month and sixth month postoperatively. Lacrimal drainage system and recurrence rates were recorded.RESULTS: This study was conducted in 81 patients, 27 of whom were men (33.3%) and 54 were women (66.7%). The mean follow-up time was 30.13±16.42 months (range 6–62 months). The mean age was 50.51±12.47 years (range 16 to 77 years). External DCR was used in 44 (66.7%) of the cases and endonasal DCR was used in 37 (45.7%) of the cases. Surgical results of DCR were divided into three groups based on the integrity and openness of the lacrimal drainage pathway in all PANDO patients. Operation success rates of these data revealed that 45 (55.6%) cases were recorded as successful, 20 (24.7%) of the cases were accepted as partially successful and 16 (19.8%) of the cases were deemed as unsuccessful. Based on these data, surgical success rates were found in 38 (86.4%) patients in external DCR and 27 (73%) patients in endonasal DCR. Surgical failure rates were six (13.6%) in external DCR and 10 (27%) in endonasal DCR. There was no statistically significant difference between success rates and recurrences in both groups (p>0.05).CONCLUSION: Endoscopic DCR produced simple, minimally invasive and preferable results compared to external DCR in the Turkish population. Although the success of external DCR is higher and the recurrence is lower than endoscopic DCR, with the outcomes of this study, endoscopic DCR can be tried as the first choice to protect the patient from major surgery and anesthesia in PANDO.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERİS, E., ÇELEBİ, A. R. C., KARASU, B., PERENTE, İ., KİRAY, G. (2022). Comparison of success between external andendonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in primary acquirednasolacrimal duct obstruction in Turkish cohort. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 6, 579–584. https://ajindex.com/articles/551405

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Caldwell GW. Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct, with preservation of the canaliculi. Am J Ophthalmol 1893;10:189–92
  2. Dupuy-Dutemps L B. Procedeplastique de dacryocystorhinostomie et ses resultants. Ann Oculist 1921;158:241–61
  3. Becker BB. Dacryocystorhinostomy without flaps. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;19:419–27
  4. Dresner SC, Klussman KG, Meyer DR, Linberg JV. Outpatient dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg 1991;22:222–4
  5. Emmerich KH, Busse H, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW. Dacryocystorhinostomia externa. Technique, indications and results. [Article in German]. Ophthalmologe 1994;91:395–8
  6. Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:488–91
  7. McLachlan DL, Shannon GM, Flanagan JC. Results of dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of the reoperations. Ophthalmic Surg 1980;11:427– 30
  8. Rosen N, Sharir M, Moverman DC, Rosner M. Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tubes: evaluation of 253 cases. Ophthalmic Surg 1989;20:115–9
  9. Caldwell GW. Two new operations for obstruction of the nasal duct with preservation of the canaliculi and an incidental description of a new lacrimal probe. NY Med J 1893;57:581–2
  10. West JM. A Window Resection of the Nasal Duct in Cases of Stenosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1910;12:654–8
  11. Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1463–8
  12. Hartikainen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, Seppä H. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1106–13
  13. Sham CL, van Hasselt CA. Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1045–9
  14. Cheung LM, Francis IC, Stapleton F, Wilcsek G. Symptom assessment in patients with functional and primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction before and after successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgery: a prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1671–4
  15. Ho A, Sachidananda R, Carrie S, Neoh C. Quality of life assessment after non-laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:399–403
  16. Penttilä E, Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Kaarniranta K, Seppä J. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy as treatment for lower lacrimal pathway obstructions in adults: Review article. Allergy Rhinol (P