Journals / Verimlilik Dergisi / 2022 / DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM VE VERİMLİLİK

DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION of SUPPLY CHAIN FUNCTIONS OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES

SANAYİ İŞLETMELERİNİN TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ FONKSİYONLARININ DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ

Pages
172–188
Publication Date
2022-01-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Originality: Insufficient number of resources in the literature on the effects of the fourth industrial revolution on industrial enterprises, especially on purchasing and logistics functions, and the opinions of the purchasing and logistics function officials/managers of industrial enterprises that implement Industry 4.0 elements provide the originality of this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study was carried out in order to determine the level at which industrial enterprises dominate the elements of Industry 4.0, to understand the relevance of the effects specified in the literature with the real, and to determine what happened during the adaptation process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews with the industrial enterprises which were included in the preliminary study list made in February 2019 were conducted online.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Originality: Insufficient number of resources in the literature on the effects of the fourth industrial revolution on industrial enterprises, especially on purchasing and logistics functions, and the opinions of the purchasing and logistics function officials/managers of industrial enterprises that implement Industry 4.0 elements provide the originality of this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Endüstri 4.0 · Sanayi İşletmeleri · Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi

Abstract

Purpose: This study was carried out in order to determine the level at which industrial enterprises dominate the elements of Industry 4.0, to understand the relevance of the effects specified in the literature with the real, and to determine what happened during the adaptation process. Methodology: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews with the industrial enterprises which were included in the preliminary study list made in February 2019 were conducted online. The interview transcripts, which were analysed by content analysis technique using the phenomenology design as a qualitative research method, were evaluated by coding them in the MAXQDA program. Findings: Findings such as which of the Industry 4.0 elements are most used by large industrial enterprises, adaptation processes, return on investment have been reached. Originality: Insufficient number of resources in the literature on the effects of the fourth industrial revolution on industrial enterprises, especially on purchasing and logistics functions, and the opinions of the purchasing and logistics function officials/managers of industrial enterprises that implement Industry 4.0 elements provide the originality of this study.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma sanayi işletmelerinin Endüstri 4.0 unsurlarına hangi düzeyde hâkim olduğunu belirlemek, literatürde belirtilen etkilerin reel ile ilgisini anlamak ve adaptasyon sürecinde yaşananları tespit etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem: 2019 Şubat ayında yapılan ön çalışma listesinde yer alan sanayi işletmeleriyle çevrim içi olarak yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden fenomenoloji deseni kullanılarak içerik analizi tekniğiyle incelenen görüşme deşifreleri MAXQDA programında kodlanarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Büyük sanayi işletmelerinin Endüstri 4.0 unsurlarından en çok hangilerini kullandıkları, adaptasyon süreçleri, yaptıkları yatırımın geri dönüşü başlıklarda bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. Özgünlük: Literatürde dördüncü sanayi devriminin sanayi işletmelerine, özellikle satın alma ve lojistik fonksiyonlarına etkilerine dair kaynakların sayısının yetersiz olmasına karşın bu çalışmada Endüstri 4.0 unsurlarını uygulayan sanayi işletmelerinin satın alma ve lojistik fonksiyonu yetkili/yöneticilerinin görüşlerinin yer alması bu çalışmanın özgünlüğünü sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALLI, Ç., ÇAYLAN, D. Ö. (2022). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION of SUPPLY CHAIN FUNCTIONS OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES. Verimlilik Dergisi, DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜM VE VERİMLİLİK, 172–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/383170

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akaba T.I., Norta A., Udokwu C., Draheim D. (2020). “A Framework for the Adoption of Blockchain-Based e-Procurement Systems in the Public Sector”, Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and CommunicationTechnology (I3E 2020), 3-14.
  2. Akyüz, A.G. (2019). “Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Üç Boyutlu Baskı Teknolojisi: Potansiyel Etkiler, Fırsatlar ve Zorluklar”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 20(2): 119-134.
  3. Alçın, S. (2016). “A New Theme for Production: Industry 4.0”, Journal of Life Economics, 3(2), 19-30.
  4. Attaran, M. (2017). “The Rise of 3-D Printing: The Advantages of Additive Manufacturing Over Traditional Manufacturing”, Business Horizons, 60(5), 677-688.
  5. Bag, S. Wood, L.C., Mangla, S.K. ve Luthra, S. (2020), “Procurement 4.0 and Its Implications on Business Process Performance in A Circular Economy”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152, 1-14.
  6. Baghci, S., Buckley, S.J., Ettl, M. ve Lin, G.Y. (1998). “Experience Using The IBM Supply Chain Simulator”, Proceedings of The 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, 1387-1394.
  7. Bakan İ. ve Şekkeli Z. (2018). “Endüstri 4.0'ın Etki̇si̇yle Loji̇sti̇k 4.0”, Journal of Life Economics, 5(2),17-36.
  8. Ballou, R.H. (2007). “The Evolution and Future of Logistics and Supply Chain Management”, European Business Review, 19(4), 332-348.
  9. Benedikt, C. ve Osborne, M. (2013). “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation?”, Oxford Martin Programme on Technology and Employment, 114, 1-77.
  10. Betti, Q. Montreuil, B., Khoury, R. ve Hallé, S. (2020). “Smart Contracts-Enabled Simulation for Hyperconnected Logistics”, Decentralised Internet of Things: A Blockchain Perspective, Editörler: Khan, M.A., Quasim, M.T., Algarni, F., Abdullah A., 109-149.
  11. Bezanson, A. (1922). “The Early Use of the Term Industrial Revolution”, The Quarterly Journal of WEconomics, 36(2), 343-349.
  12. Bogdan, B. ve Bilken, S.K. (1992). “Foundations of Qualitative Research in Education, Quality Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods, Allyn and Bacon, Boston. Börü, F. ve Demiröz, D.M. (2019). “Beşinci ve Altıncı Kondratieff Dalgalarının Teknolojik ve Sosyoekonomik Etkileri”, İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 69(2), 247-283.
  13. Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M. ve Rosenberg, M. (2014). “How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing Landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective”, International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering, 8(1), 37-44. Britanicca T. Editors of Ency