Journals / Toplum ve Hekim / 2011 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Public-private partnership in the organization of health services

Sağlık hizmetlerinin örgütlenmesinde kamu–özel ortaklığı

Pages
245–273
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the model is evaluated with a critical point of view, also tested in terms of the hypothesis of neo-liberal organization theories that the model depends on.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Public-private partnership is an organization model based on contract which embrace and convert the administration relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This model, which spreads swiftly in health sector, is built upon organizing the services in managerialism principles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the model is evaluated with a critical point of view, also tested in terms of the hypothesis of neo-liberal organization theories that the model depends on.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Public-private partnership is an organization model based on contract which embrace and convert the administration relationship. This model, which spreads swiftly in health sector, is built upon organizing the services in managerialism principles. It is a market-friendly model in terms of the principles and values of financing and organizing the public services. In this model, government takes part only in clinical services (core services). The construction of health facilities, delivery of clinical support services and non-clinical services, and operation of commercial spaces are transferred en bloc, to private sector (to a single jointventure). In this manner, the scale of the model is expanded too. The key feature of the model is its financing methods. Government is makes the payments as annual rents which are off-budget, for the goods, services and construction-works procured by private sector with long-term contracts. This article is aiming to analyze -by benefiting from the experiences of several countries- the organization structure of the hospitals, which are in the bidding process in the health sector in Turkey, and which are to be constructed by public-private partnership model. In this study, the model is evaluated with a critical point of view, also tested in terms of the hypothesis of neo-liberal organization theories that the model depends on.

Özet

Kamu-özel ortaklığı, yönetim ilişkisini kuşatan ve dönüştüren sözleşme temelinde bir örgütlenme modelidir. Sağlık alanında hızla yaygınlaşan bu model, hizmetlerin işletmecilik esasları temelinde örgütlendirilmesine dayanmakta olup, hizmetlerin finansmanı ve örgütlenme ilke ve değerleri açısından piyasa dostu bir modeldir. Devletin sadece tıbbi hizmet (çekirdek hizmet) üretiminde yer aldığı bu modelde, sağlık tesislerinin yapımı, tıbbi destek ve tıbbi olmayan hizmetlerin sunumu ve ticari alanların işletilmesi özel sektöre (tek bir ortak girişime) blok halinde devredilmektedir. Bu şekilde ölçeğin de büyütüldüğü modelin kilit özelliği, finansman biçimidir. Devlet, uzun süreli sözleşmelerle ortak girişimden temin ettiği mal, hizmet ve yapım işinin karşılığını bütçe dışı yollarla, yıllık kira şeklinde ödemektedir. Yazı, sağlık hizmetleri alanında Türkiye'de kamu-özel ortaklığı modeliyle yapılacak hastanelerin örgütlenme biçimini, modeli uygulayan farklı ülkelerin deneyimlerinden de yararlanarak analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada model, dayandığı neo liberal örgüt kuramlarının varsayımları açısından da test edilerek eleştirel bakışla değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARASU, K. (2011). Public-private partnership in the organization of health services. Toplum ve Hekim, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 245–273. https://ajindex.com/articles/367586

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akdağ, R.(Ed.) (2010) Türk Sağlık Sistemi'nde Kurum Dışından Hizmet Alım Uygulamaları: Araştırma Raporu (Ankara: Refik Saydam Hıfzısıhha Merkezi Başkanlığı). Argyriades, D. (2010) "From Bureaucracy to Debureaucratization?" Public Organization Review, 10/3:275-297.
  2. Ataay, F. (2008) "Sağlık Reformu ve Yurttaşlık Hakları," Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 41 /3:169-184.
  3. Büber, B. (2010),Yeni Bir Çatışma Alanı: Kamu Alımları (Ankara: AÜ SBE Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Council of Europe (2003) Guide to Successful Public-Private Partnerships, DG Regio March 2003, ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/ guides/ppp_en.pdf, (20.06.2011).
  4. Council of Europe (2004) Green Paper on Public-Private Partnerships and Community Law on Public Contracts and Concessions, COM (2004) 327 final. Brussels 30.04.2004, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?ur i=COM: 2004: 0327:FIN:EN:PDF, (20.06.2011).
  5. Edwards, PL, Shaoul, J., Stafford, A., Arblaster,L. (2004) Evaluating The Operation of PFI in Roads and Hospitals (London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust). Elsenstadt, S. N. (1959) "Bureaucracy, Bureaucratization, and Debureaucratization, "Administrative Science Quarterly, 4/3: 302-320.
  6. Flinders, M. (2005) "The Politics of Public- Private Partnerships," The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7/2:215-239.
  7. Gerrard, M. B. (2001) "What Are Public- Private Partnerships, and How Do They Differ from Privatization," Finance & Development, A Quarterly Magazine of the IMF, 38/3:1 -4. Grimsey, D. - Lewis, M. K. (2005) "Are Public Private Partnerships Value For Money? Development," Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24: 89-101.
  8. Mols, F. (2010) "Harnessing Market Competition in PPP Procurement: The Importance of Periodically Taking a Strategic View," The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69/2:229-244.
  9. Monbiot, G. "Public Fraud Initiative," http:// www. guardian, co. uk/po I itics/2002/jun/1 8/ publicservices.politicalcolumnists, (4.5.2011). National Audit Office (NAO) (2002) The PFI Contract for the Redevelopment of West Middlesex University Hospital (London: HC 49 Session 2002-2003:21). National Audit Office (NAO) (2010) The Performance and Management of Hospital PFI Contracts (London: HC 68 Session 2010-2011). National Audit Office (NAO) (2011) Lessons From PFI and Other Projects (London: HC 920 Session 2010-2012). OECD (2008a) Public-Private Partnerships: In Pursuit of Risk Sharing and Value for Money (OECD Publishing, Paris). OECD (2