SavedAdd your journal

Journals / TİSK Akademi / 2015 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20

From Hierarchical Order to Heterarchical Order: The Concept of Governance and Governance Theories

Hiyerarşik Düzenden Heterarşik Düzene: Yönetişim Kavramı ve Yönetişim Teorileri

EBRU CANIKALP
İLTER ÜNLÜKAPLAN
Pages
250–269
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conjunction with definition of governance which take place in literature, in this study it is aimed to examine theoretical structure in the framework of these disciplines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study it has been emphasised the concept of “governance” which has gain importance towards the end of 1980s and theory of concept. “Governance” is involved within different academic disciplines such as sociology, public administration, political science, planning, international relations, and economics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study it has been emphasised the concept of “governance” which has gain importance towards the end of 1980s and theory of concept. “Governance” is involved within different academic disciplines such as sociology, public administration, political science, planning, international relations, and economics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conjunction with definition of governance which take place in literature, in this study it is aimed to examine theoretical structure in the framework of these disciplines.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study it has been emphasised the concept of “governance” which has gain importance towards the end of 1980s and theory of concept. “Governance” is involved within different academic disciplines such as sociology, public administration, political science, planning, international relations, and economics. Conjunction with definition of governance which take place in literature, in this study it is aimed to examine theoretical structure in the framework of these disciplines.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 1980li yılların sonuna doğru önem kazanan yönetişim kavramı ve kavramın teorik yapısı üzerinde durulmuştur. Yönetişim kavramı; sosyoloji, kamu yönetimi, siyaset bilimi, planlama, uluslararası ilişkiler, iktisat, kalkınma çalışmaları gibi farklı akademik disiplinler içinde yer almaktadır. Bu çalışma kapsamında kavramın literatürde yer alan tanımlamaları ile birlikte bu disiplinler çerçevesinde teorik yapının incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANIKALP, E., ÜNLÜKAPLAN, İ. (2015). From Hierarchical Order to Heterarchical Order: The Concept of Governance and Governance Theories. TİSK Akademi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 20, 250–269. https://ajindex.com/articles/364474

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aktan, C. C. (2003). Değişim Çağında Devlet. 1.Baskı. Konya: Çizgi Kitapevi. Amadae, S. M. (2011). Rational Choice Theory. In M. Bevir (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Governance. Washington: SAGE Publications, 785-791. “Anonim”. Policy Instrument. 04.02.2014 tarihinde http://dwb.unl.edu/teacher/nsf/c09/c09links/www.casahome.org/policy.htm. adresinden erişildi. Argüden, Y. (2008). Küresel Yönetişim. Fikret Toksöz (Ed.), İyi Yönetişim Bülteni. 3, İstanbul, 2-4.
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley. Astley, W. G. ve Van de Ven, A. H. (1983). Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 245-273.
  3. Basu, R. L. (2011). Kautilya’s Arthasastra (300 B.C.): Economic Ideas. India: Kolkata Benson, J. K. (1977). Innovation and Crisis In Organisational Analysis. The Sociological Quarterly. 18, 3-16.
  4. Bevir, M. (2011a).
  5. Governance as Theory, Practice, and Dilemma. In M. Bevir (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Washington: SAGE Publications, 1-16.
  6. Bevir, M. (2011b). Interpretive Theory. In M. Bevir (Eds.), The SAGE Handebook of Governance. Washington: SAGE Publications, 51-64.
  7. Black, D. (1948). On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making. Journal of Political Economy. 56, 23-34.
  8. Börzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon- On The Different Conceptions of Policy Networks. Public Administration.76(2), 253-273.
  9. Caves, R. E.ve Porter, M. E. (1977). From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 91(2), 241-261.
  10. Chemma, S. G. (2004). From Public Administration to Governance: The Paradigm Shift in The Link Between Government and Citizens. 6th Global Forum on Reinventing Government. United Nations, New York. Christensen, R. K.ve Tschirhart, M. (2011). The SAGE Handebook of Governance. In M. Bevir (Eds.), The SAGE Handebook of Governance. Washington: SAGE Publications, 65-78.
  11. Dowding, K. (2011). Rational Choice Theory. In M. Bevir(Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Washington: SAGE Publications, 36-50.
  12. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper. Enroth, H. (2011). Policy Network Theory. In M. Bevir (Eds.), The SAGE Handebook of Governance. Washington: SAGE Publications, 17-35.
  13. Esmark, A. (2011). Systems Theory. In M. Bevir (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Governance. Washington: SAGE Publications, 91-105.
  14. European Union. (2008). State-Society Analytical Framework. Initiative For Peace Buildi