Journals / Tıp Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Correlation between hand preference and distance of focusing points of two eyes in the Horizontal plane

Horizontal planda iki gözün odaklama mesafesi ile el tercihi arasındaki ilişkiler

Pages
5–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: These results suggest that hand preference may be related to the degree of ocular asymmetry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Results: The shifting distance of the right -eye was marginally greater, although significant , in the left-handers as compared to the right -handers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the total sample , there was a significant negative Pearson correlation between hand-preference and the shifting distance of the right-eye, and there was a positive correlation between hand-preference and the shifting distance of the left-eye.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: These results suggest that hand preference may be related to the degree of ocular asymmetry.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Göz hareketleri · Baskınlık · serebral

Abstract

Results: The shifting distance of the right -eye was marginally greater, although significant , in the left-handers as compared to the right -handers. The shifting distance of the left -eye was greater in the right-handers than in the left-handers. The distance of focusing points of two eyes in the horizontal plane was greater in the right -handers than in the left-handers. In the total sample , there was a significant negative Pearson correlation between hand-preference and the shifting distance of the right-eye, and there was a positive correlation between hand-preference and the shifting distance of the left-eye. In addition there was a significant positive correlation between hand preference and the distance of focusing points of two eyes. Conclusion: These results suggest that hand preference may be related to the degree of ocular asymmetry.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada el tercihi, oküler dominans ve göz kayma derecesi arasındaki ilişkiler araştırıldı. Gereç ve yöntem: Yüzbeş sağlak, 20 solak denekte çalışıldı. Oküler dominans Miles testi ile tesbit edildi. Göz kayma derecesi modifiye Miles testi ile ölçüldü. Bulgular: Sağ gözün kayma mesafesi oldukça belirgin bir şekilde solaklarda sağlaklardan daha büyüktü. Sol gözün kayma mesafesi ise sağlaklarda solaklardan daha büyüktü. Yatay planda iki gözün odaklama mesafesi sağlaklarda solaklardakinden daha büyüktü. Tüm örneklemde el tercihi ile sağ gözün kayma derecesi arasında belirgin negatif Pearson korelasyonu var iken el tercihi ile sol gözün kayma derecesi arasında belirgin pozitif Pearson korelasyonu vardı. Ayrıca, el tercihi ile iki gözün odaklama mesafesi arasında belirgin pozitif Pearson korelasyonu vardı. Sonuç: Bu sonuçlar el tercihinin oküler asimetrinin derecesi ile ilişkili olabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, A. T., ASLANKURT, M., BAYKAL, O., DANE, Ş. (2003). Correlation between hand preference and distance of focusing points of two eyes in the Horizontal plane. Tıp Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 5–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/361785

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Geshwind N, Behan P. Left-handedness: association with immune disease, migraine, and developmental learning disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1982; 79: 5097-5100
  2. Springer SP, Deutsch G. Left brain, right brain: perspectives from cognitive neuroscience 5th Ed. New York: Freeman, 1998: 136-37 3. Gur RC, Turetsky BI, Matsui M, Yan M, Bilker W, Hughett P, Gur RE. Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: correlations with cognitive performance. Journal of Neuroscience 1999; 19: 4065-4072
  3. Annett M. Left, right, hand, and brain: right-shift theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1986: 48 5. Herrmann DJ, Van Dyke K. Handedness and the mental rotation of perceived patterns. Cortex 1978; 14: 521-529
  4. Porac C, Coren S. Lateral preferences and human behavior. New York: Springer- Verlag. 1981: 255-56 7. Sanders B, Wilson JR, Vandenberg SG. Handedness and spatial ability. Cortex 1982; 18: 79-90
  5. Peterson J, Lansky L. Left handedness among architects: some facts and speculation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1974; 38: 547-550
  6. Mebert CJ, Michel GF. Handedness in artists. In J. Herron (Ed.), Neuropsychology of lefthandedness, New York: Academic Press. 1980: 87 1O. Annett M, Turner A. Laterality and the growth of intellectual abilities. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1974; 44; 37-46
  7. Baykal O, Dane Ş, Akar S, Çolak A, Pençe S. Relationships between hand preference and eye dominance in normal human subjects. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 1995; 24: 95-97
  8. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburg Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97-114
  9. Tan U. The distribution of hand preference in normal men and women. International Journal of Neuroscience 1988; 41: 35-55
  10. Miles WR. Ocular dominance in human adults. Journal of General Psychology 1930; 3: 412-420
  11. Rombouts RB, Barkhof F, Sprenger M, Valk J, Scheltens P. The functional basis of ocular dominance: functional MRI (fMRI) findings. Neuroscience Letters 1996; 221: 1-4
  12. Merrell DJ. Dominance of eye and hand. Human Biology 1957; 29: 314-328
  13. Khan AZ, Crawford JD. Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle. Vision Research 2001; 41: 1743-1748
  14. Azemar G, Ripoll H, Simonet P, Stein JF. Etude neuropsychologique du comportement des gauschers en eserime. Cinesiologie 1983; 22: 7-18
  15. McLean JM, Ciurczak FM. Cerebral lateralization and specialization in the human centra