SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tasarım+Kuram / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 23

-

Tasarımda Yetkinleşme Mecralarına İlişkin Görsel Bir Okuma

UFUK ULUSAN
AHMET ZEKİ TURAN
Pages
137–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Interpretation of channel relations points to three basic ch

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article, through designed products, aims to reveal the visual reflections of conceptual categories which are defined as channels of competence acquisiton in the thesis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This way, it is foreseen that the relations of these channels to each other would be put forward.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Interpretation of channel relations points to three basic ch
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article, through designed products, aims to reveal the visual reflections of conceptual categories which are defined as channels of competence acquisiton in the thesis. This way, it is foreseen that the relations of these channels to each other would be put forward. This perusal takes place firstly through a student project and then through institutions and designers. In this way, the article predicts that the theoretical model will be more understandable and can be related to the practical framework of design. Interpretation of channel relations points to three basic ch

Özet

Bu makale, tezde tasarıma ilişkinyetkinleşme mecraları olarak tanımlanankavramsal kategorilerin görsel yansımalarını,tasarlanmış ürünler üzerinden açığa çıkarmave bu sayede mecraların birbirleriyle olanilişkilerini ortaya koyma amacındadır. Buokuma ilk önce bir öğrenci projesi, dahasonra ise kurum ve tasarımcı örnekleri üzerindengerçekleşmektedir. Makale bu yolla,kuramsal özellik gösteren modelinanlaşılabilirliğinin artacağını ve tasarımınpratik çerçevesiyle ilişkilendirilebileceğiniöngörmektedir. Mecra ilişkilerininyorumlanması ise, bu uğurda oluşturulan üçtemel karakteristiğe işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUSAN, U., TURAN, A. Z. (2017). -. Tasarım+Kuram, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 23, 137–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/359013

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adams, R.S., Turns J., Atman C. 2003. What Could Design Learning Look Like? In: Expertise in Design Design Thinking Research Symposium 6, 17-19 November 2003,
  2. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. Ahmed, S.K., Wallace, M., Blessing, L. 2003. Understanding The Differences Between How Novice and Experienced Designers Approach Design Tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14, Issue 1, pp. 1-11.
  3. Atman, C.J., Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K.M., Nachtmann, H.L. 1999. A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 20(2), pp. 131-152.
  4. Christiaans, H., Dorst, C. 1992. Cognitive Models in Industrial Design Engineering: a protocol study, In: Taylor, D.L., Stauffer, D.A., eds. Design Theory and Methodology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, USA. Cross, N. 2004. Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25(5), pp. 427-441.
  5. Kavakli, M., Gero J. 2002. The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers. Design Studies, 23(1), pp. 25-40.
  6. Kruger, C., Cross, N. 2006. Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes. Design Studies, 27(5), pp. 527-548.
  7. Popovic, V. 2004. Expertise development in product design-strategic and domain-specific knowledge connections. Design Studies, 25(5), pp. 527-545.
  8. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Hakkarainen K. 2001. “Composition and construction in experts’ and novices’ weaving design. Design Studies, 22(2), pp. 47-66.
  9. Uslu, O. 2016. Waage. Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü 2015/2016
  10. Güz Yarıyılı Bitirme Projesi, MSGSÜ, İstanbul. www.tdk.gov.tr, TDK Elektronik Sözlüğü.