Journals / Tasarım+Kuram / 2012 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 14

Tüketime Ba¤l› Bir Kimlik Ö¤esi Olarak Konut ve Planlama Aç›s›ndan Bir De¤erlendirme

Pages
29–45
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this article is to discuss the gated communities, which epitomize commodified housing pro- duction in the frame of consumer society, referring to Istanbul.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Private sector investments are the leading factor of housing production today while public agents become a part of the housing market, instead of controlling it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A new consumerist segment in the society has emerged in Turkey after the transition to free market economy, in line with the glob- al tendencies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this article is to discuss the gated communities, which epitomize commodified housing pro- duction in the frame of consumer society, referring to Istanbul.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Private sector investments are the leading factor of housing production today while public agents become a part of the housing market, instead of controlling it. A new consumerist segment in the society has emerged in Turkey after the transition to free market economy, in line with the glob- al tendencies. Luxury housing became an instrument for investment as well as a sign of social status of the inhabitants. Housing production, which is a human right, with- out public control leads to problems in the field of urban planning. On the one hand, there is a shortage of affordable housing production, on the other development of gated communities surround periphery of the cities. Not only gated communities but also housing development projects in inner cities became the commodities of free mar- ket, which constitutes a contradiction with the nature of the planning. The aim of this article is to discuss the gated communities, which epitomize commodified housing pro- duction in the frame of consumer society, referring to Istanbul.

Özet

Öz Günümüzde konut üretiminde, kamu müdahalesinden çok piyasada üretimi belirleyen süreç ve koflullar›n etkili oldu¤u, giderek kamunun da piyasadaki aktörler gibi davranmaya bafllad›¤› görülmektedir. Türkiyenin serbest piyasa ekonomisine geçmesiyle gelir da¤›l›m› giderek bozul- maya bafllam›fl, küresel ölçekte izlenebilen e¤ilimlere de uygun flekilde, lüks tüketime yönelen bir kitle ortaya ç›km›flt›r. Konut, art›k bir yat›r›m arac› oldu¤u kadar, toplumsal statüyü de simgeleyen bir tüketim mal› haline gelmifltir. Temel insan gereksinimlerinden olan konuta bu yaklafl›m, planlama alan› aç›s›ndan baz› sorun alanlar›n› gündeme getirmektedir. Bar›nma amac› ile tüm gelir gruplar› için yeterli ve eriflilebilir konut alanlar› planla- mas› yaklafl›m›n›n yetersizlik gösterdi¤i, piyasa süreçleri içinde kentin çeperlerine yerleflerek kentin yay›lmas›nda belirleyici olan yeni kapal› sitelerin oluflturuldu¤u görülmektedir. Bu yaklafl›m, kent planla- man›n do¤as› ile çeliflmektedir. Makalenin amac›, mevcut konutlaflma e¤ilimleri için- den kapal› sitelerin tüketim toplumu aç›s›ndan tart›fl›lmas› ve bu tür konutlaflman›n kent planlama disiplini aç›s›ndan de¤erlendirilmesidir. Tart›flma, ‹stanbul kentinin konut üretim dinamikleri ile örneklenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜR, E. F. (2012). Tüketime Ba¤l› Bir Kimlik Ö¤esi Olarak Konut ve Planlama Aç›s›ndan Bir De¤erlendirme. Tasarım+Kuram, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 14, 29–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/358998

References (10)

  1. Atkinson, R. 2006. Padding the Bunker: Strategies of Middle-class Disaffiliation and Colonisation in the City. Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 819-832
  2. Atkinson R, Blandy S, Flint J, Lister D. 2004. Gated Cities of Today: Barricaded Residential Development in England. Gated Communities: Building Social Division or Safer Communities?. 18-19 September 2003,
  3. Glasgow. Bali, R. N. 2002. Tarz-› Hayat’tan Life Style’a -Yeni Seçkinler, Yeni Mekanlar, Yeni Yaflamlar. ‹stanbul: ‹letiflim Yay›nlar› Barthes, Roland. 1998. Ça¤dafl Söylenler. çev. Tahsin Yücel. ‹stanbul: Metis Yay›nlar› Baudrillard, J. 2004. Tüketim Toplumu. çev. H. Deliçayl›, F. Keskin. ‹stanbul:.Ayr›nt› Yay. Blakely, E. J; Snyder, M. G. 1999.
  4. Fortress America, Gated Communities in the United States, Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press Bourdieu, P. 1995. Pratik Nedenler. ‹stanbul: Kesit Yay›nc›l›k Davis, M. 1992. City of Quartz. New York: Vintage Books, Ekici, T. 2011. Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Geliflme Çerçevesinde Kapal› Sitelerin ‹rdelenmesi: ‹stanbul Çekmeköy Örne¤i. yay›nlanmam›fl Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, FBE, ‹stanbul. Erkip, F. 2010. Community and neighborhood relations in Ankara: An urban-suburban contrast. Cities, 27 (2010) pp. 96-102
  5. Firidin Özgür, Ebru. 2006. Sosyal ve Mekansal Ayr›flma Çerçevesinde Yeni Konutlaflma E¤ilimleri: Kapal› Siteler, ‹stanbul, Çekmeköy Örne¤i. yay›mlanmam›fl doktora tezi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, FBE, ‹stanbul. Firidin Özgür, Ebru. 2011. Konut Alanlar›nda Güncel E¤ilimler ve Mahalle Olgusu. TOL, güz 2010- bahar 2011, Kayseri MO Yay›n›, ss.16-24.
  6. Giglia, A. 2003. Gated Communities in Mexico City. Gated Communities: Building Social Division or Safer Communities?, 18-19 September 2003,
  7. Glasgow. Gooblar, A. 2002. Outside the Walls: Urban Gated Communities and their Regulation within the British Planning System. European Planning Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 321-334.
  8. Grant, J. 2003. Planning responses to gated communities in Canada. Gated communities: building social division or safer communities?, 18-19 September 2003, Glasgow. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/cnrpapersword/gated/grant.doc, 20.09.2004.
  9. Harvey, David. 2001.
  10. Spaces of Capital, New York: Routledge Ifl›k, O, P›narc›o¤lu, M. 2003. Nöbetlefle Yoksulluk: Gecekondulaflma ve Kent Yoksullar›: Sultanbeyli Örne¤i. ‹stanbul: ‹letiflim ‹BB, fiehir Planlama Müdürlü¤ü. 2009. 1/100000 Ölçekli ‹stanbul Çevre Düzeni Plan› Raporu. Keyder, Ça¤lar. 2000. Enformel Konut