SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tasarım+Kuram / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 19

Conceptual Evolution of Architectural Program Through the Second Half of the 20th Century

ÜLKÜ ÖZTEN
Pages
37–54
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Aiming towards a reconsideration of the notion, it concludes with presenting our present understanding and conception of the notion, namely the present "state" of architectural program in the architectural agenda

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper traces the conceptual evolution of architectural program through the second half of the 20th century.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It discusses the evolution of the notion and its place in the architectural discourse in the works of various scholars, while giving and reviewing essential views, with a particular focus on two paradigmatic epistemological positions under which these views could be categorized: analysis-synthesis and conjecture-refutations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Aiming towards a reconsideration of the notion, it concludes with presenting our present understanding and conception of the notion, namely the present "state" of architectural program in the architectural agenda
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper traces the conceptual evolution of architectural program through the second half of the 20th century. It discusses the evolution of the notion and its place in the architectural discourse in the works of various scholars, while giving and reviewing essential views, with a particular focus on two paradigmatic epistemological positions under which these views could be categorized: analysis-synthesis and conjecture-refutations. Aiming towards a reconsideration of the notion, it concludes with presenting our present understanding and conception of the notion, namely the present "state" of architectural program in the architectural agenda

Özet

Makale mimari programın yirminci yüzyılın ikinci yarısı boyunca kavramsal evrimini izler. Mimari program nosyonunun mimarlık söylemindeki evrimini ve mimarlıktaki konumunu çeşitli kuramcıların farklı görüşler sunan çalışmalarında gözden geçirir. Analiz-sentez ve varsayım-yanlışlama olarak ifade edilen farklı iki ana paradigmatik epistemolojik pozisyon altında kategorize edilebilecek söz konusu yaklaşımları ilgili pozisyonlara referansla gözden geçirmek suretiyle tartışır. Makale dört ana bölüm altında yapısallaştırılır. Durumu ve problemi özetleyen giriş bölümünü takiben ikinci bölümde ilk paradigmatik pozisyon olan analiz-sentezin epistemolojik kökenleri belirtilerek dönemin program anlayışının söz konusu epistemolojik kökene referansla nasıl kavramsallaştığının yanı sıra program-geleneksel tasarım, program-programlama-hesaplama gibi temel tartışma alanları, problemi ele alan farklı kuramcıların çalışmalarına referansla tartışılır. Üçüncü bölümde, bir karşı paradigma olarak gündeme gelen varsayım-yanlışlama modeli epistemolojik kökenleri üzerinden incelenir ve farklı kuramcıların çalışmalarında mimari programın nasıl değişip Acknowledgement: This article is based on the author's doctoral dissertation completed at the Middle East Technical University - Ankara, under the direction of Mine Özkar.dönüştüğü; analiz-sentez modelinin eleştirisi üzerine kurulan varsayım-yanlışlama modeli altında mimari program anlayışının nasıl evrimleştiği araştırılarak tartışılır. Sonuç bölümünde ise, makale, mimari programın yeniden kavramsallaştırılmasına yönelik mimarlık gündemindeki güncel "durumu" ortaya koyar

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTEN, Ü. (2015). Conceptual Evolution of Architectural Program Through the Second Half of the 20th Century. Tasarım+Kuram, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 19, 37–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/358978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Alexander, C. 1973. Notes on the Synthesis of Form. seventh edition ed. London: Oxford University Press. (First published by Harvard University Press. in 1964)
  2. Anay, H. 2012. (Epistemological) Formalism and its Influence on Architecture: A Concise Review. A|Z Journal of the ITU Faculty of Architecture, 9 (1). Anderson, S. 1984. Architectural Design as a System of Research Programs. Design Studies, 5 (3). Anderson, S. 1984. Architectural Research Programmes in the Work of Le Corbusier. Design Studies, 5 (3), pp. 151-158.
  3. Andreotti, L. 1984. Conceptual and Artifactual Research Programmes in Louis Kahn's Design of the Philips Exeter Academy. Design Studies, 5 (3). Archer, B. 1965. Systematic Method for Designers. London: The Design Council. Archer, B. 1970. An Overview of the Structure of the Design Process. In: G. T. Moore, ed. Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning. Cambridge, Massachussets, and London, England: The MIT Press, pp. 285-307.
  4. Archer, B. 1979. Design As a Discipline. Design Studies, 1 (1). Archer, B. 1981. A View of The Nature of Design Research. In: Design:Science:Method. Guilford: Westbury House, pp. 30-47.
  5. Archer, B. 1999. On Methods of Research. Ankara: METU Faculty of Architecture Press.
  6. Bacon, F. 1905.
  7. Novum Organum. New York, P.F. Collier & Son. (First published in Latin in 1620) Ball, L., Onarheim, B. & Christensen, B. T. 2010.
  8. Design Requirements, Epistemic Uncertainty and Solution Development Strategies in Software Design. Design Studies, 31 (6), pp. 567-589.
  9. Bamford, G. 2002. From Analysis/Synthesis to Conjecture/ Analysis: A Review of Karl Popper's Influence on Design Methodology in Architecture. Design Studies, May, 23 (3), pp. 245-261.
  10. Bartley, W. W. 1965. How Is the House of Science Built? The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. AA Journal, pp. 213-218.
  11. Bayazit, N. 2004. Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research. Design Issues, 20 (1), pp. 16-29.
  12. Brawne, M. 1995.
  13. Research, Design and Popper. Architectural Research Quarterly, pp. 10-15.
  14. Broadbent, G. 1969. Design Method in Architecture. In: G. Broadbent & A. Ward, eds. Design Methods in Architecture. New York: George Wittenborn Inc., pp. 15-21.
  15. Broadbent, G. 1979. The Development of Design Methods - A Review. In: Design Methods and Theories. s. l.: s.n., pp. 41-45.
  16. Broadbent, G. 1981.
  17. The Morality of Designing. Guilford, Westbury House. Bunnin, N. & Yu, J. 2004. The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. s. l.: Blackwell Publishing. Burry, M.