SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Performance Analysis of Queue Management Algorithms Between Remote-Host and PG-W in LTE Networks

LTE Ağlarda Remote-Host ile PG-W Arasındaki Kuyruk Yönetim Algoritmalarının Performans Analizi

Muhammet ÇAKMAK
Zafer ALBAYRAK
Pages
456–463
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the effect of the performance of RED, CoDel, Pie and PFIFO, which are active queue management algorithms operating between Remote Host and PG-W, on LTE network on end-to-end average throughput, latency and packet dropping rates were evaluated comparatively and the results were evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the rapid development of the mobile communication, most of the internet content is provided by cellular networks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The algorithms used during the congestion in cellular networks try to solve the problem of queue overflow and bottleneck.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the effect of the performance of RED, CoDel, Pie and PFIFO, which are active queue management algorithms operating between Remote Host and PG-W, on LTE network on end-to-end average throughput, latency and packet dropping rates were evaluated comparatively and the results were evaluated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

With the rapid development of the mobile communication, most of the internet content is provided by cellular networks. The algorithms used during the congestion in cellular networks try to solve the problem of queue overflow and bottleneck. In the LTE network, the data transfer between the remote host and the PG-W directly affects the operating speed of the cellular network. Choosing an active queue management algorithm is critical to the LTE cellular network. In this study, the effect of the performance of RED, CoDel, Pie and PFIFO, which are active queue management algorithms operating between Remote Host and PG-W, on LTE network on end-to-end average throughput, latency and packet dropping rates were evaluated comparatively and the results were evaluated.

Özet

Mobil iletişiminin hızlı gelişmesiyle internet içeriğinin çoğu günümüzde hücresel ağlar ile sağlanmaktadır. Hücresel ağlarda yaşanan tıkanıklık sırasında kullanılan algoritmalar paket gecikmesi, kuyruk taşması ve darboğaz problemlerini çözmeye çalışmaktadırlar. LTE ağlarında remote-host ile PG-W düğümü arasındaki veri transferi yüksek hız gerektirmekte bu da hücresel ağın çalışma hızını doğrudan etkilemektedir. Doğru bir kuyruk yönetim algoritmasının seçilmesi LTE hücresel ağı için kritik bir önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada LTE ağlarında remote-host ile PG-W arasında çalışan aktif kuyruk yönetim algoritmaları olan RED, CoDel, Pie ve pFIFO’nun performanslarının, uçtan uca ortalama verim, gecikme ve paket düşürme oranları üzerindeki etkisi karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir ve sonuçları değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAK, M., ALBAYRAK, Z. (2020). Performance Analysis of Queue Management Algorithms Between Remote-Host and PG-W in LTE Networks. ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 456–463. https://ajindex.com/articles/354914

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cisco and S. Jose, “Cisco visual networking index (VNI) global mobile data traffic,” Ca, Usa, pp. 3–5, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/serviceprovider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11- 738429.html
  2. S. Y. Hui and K. H. Yeung, “Challenges in the Migration to 4G Mobile Systems,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 54–59, 2003, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2003.1252799
  3. D. Astély, E. Dahlman, A. Furuskär, Y. Jading, M. Lindström, and S. Parkvall, “LTE: The evolution of mobile broadband,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 44–51, 2009, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2009.4907406
  4. M. Çakmak and Z. Albayrak, “A Review: Mobile Communication Past, Present and Future,” 2018 International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Computer Engineering and Science (ICATCES), pp. 141– 145, 2018
  5. M. Rinne and O. Tirkkonen, “LTE, the radio technology path towards 4G,” Comput. Commun., vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 1894–1906, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2010.07.001
  6. C. Applications, “an Active Queue Management,” vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2009
  7. Santhi V. and Natarajan A.M., “Performance Analysis of Active Queue Management Algorithms,” Inf. Sci. Comput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 230–232, 2009, [Online]. Available:
  8. B. Qureshi, M. Othman, S. Subramaniam, and N. A. Wati, “QTCP: Improving Throughput Performance Evaluation with High-Speed Networks,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2663–2691, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s13369- 012-0483-z
  9. P. J. Argibay-Losada, K. Nozhnina, A. SuárezGonzález, C. López-García, and M. Fernández-Veiga, “Loss-based proportional fairness in multihop wireless networks,” Wirel. Networks, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 805–816, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11276-013-0644-3
  10. N. Iya, N. Kuhn, F. Verdicchio, and G. Fairhurst, “Analyzing the impact of bufferbloat on latency-sensitive applications,” IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., vol. 2015-Septe, no. ii, pp. 6098–6103, 2015, doi: 10.1109/ICC.2015.7249294
  11. L. S. Brakmo and L. L. Peterson, “TCP Vegas: End to End Congestion Avoidance on a Global Internet,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1465–1480, 1995, doi: 10.1109/49.464716
  12. A. Abdelsalam, M. Luglio, C. Roseti, and F. Zampognaro, “TCP Wave: A new reliable transport approach for future internet,” Comput. Networks, vol. 112, pp. 122–143, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2016.11.002
  13. S. Mascolo, C. Casetti, M. Gerla, M. Y. Sanadidi, and R