Journals / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 6

Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*

Pages
2193–2216
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results show that approximately 17% of the variation in student test scores is explained by differences between schools, while the remainder of the variation is accounted for by within-school factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to discuss student and school factors, including cross level interaction, that cause inequalities in seven and eighth grade students' achievement in Turkish context by using national achievement test scores with a multi-level statistical approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our results show that approximately 17% of the variation in student test scores is explained by differences between schools, while the remainder of the variation is accounted for by within-school factors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results also show that average parent education and income, full-day schooling, attending an urban school and the percentage of female students in the classroom mediate the relationship between student-level variables and student test scores.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to discuss student and school factors, including cross level interaction, that cause inequalities in seven and eighth grade students' achievement in Turkish context by using national achievement test scores with a multi-level statistical approach. Our results are in line with most other studies with similar purpose. Our results show that approximately 17% of the variation in student test scores is explained by differences between schools, while the remainder of the variation is accounted for by within-school factors. Our results highlight that student-level variables alone explain nearly 73% of the between-school variance and approximately 19% of the within-school variance in student achievement scores. Our school-level variables explain a relatively small amount of the variation, approximately 5%. This has demonstrated that between- and within-school differences in student achievement are largely accounted for by the socio-demographic background of students. This is in line with the Coleman Study findings; the effect of school characteristics on student achievement was modest compared to the effect of students' socio demographic characteristics. Our results also show that average parent education and income, full-day schooling, attending an urban school and the percentage of female students in the classroom mediate the relationship between student-level variables and student test scores.

🔖

Cite This Article

BÖRKAN, B., BAKIŞ, O. (2016). Determinants of Academic Achievement of Middle Schoolers in Turkey*. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 6, 2193–2216. https://ajindex.com/articles/346029

References (9)

  1. Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 182-192.
  2. Anıl, D., Özer-Özkan, Y., & Demir, E. (2015). PISA 2012 araştırması ulusal nihai rapor [PISA 2012 research national final report] Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/ d/0B2wxMX5xMcnhaGtn V2x6YWsyY2c/view Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & Letendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the "Heyneman Loxley Effect" on Mathematics and Science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46, 291-312.
  3. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  4. Bauer, D. J., & Cai, L. (2009). Consequences of unmodeled nonlinear effects in multilevel models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 97-114.
  5. Bezerra, M. E., Kassouf, A. L., & Arends-Kuenning, M. (2009). The impact of child labor and school quality on academic achievement in Brazil (IZA Discussion Paper No. 4062). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract =1369808 Binder, A. J. (1999). Community effects and desired schooling of parents and children in Mexico. Economics of Education Review, 18, 311-325.
  6. Blanden, J., & Gregg, P. (2004). Family income and educational attainment: A review of approaches and evidence for Britain. CMPO Working Paper Series No. 04/101. Retrieved from http://www. bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/publications /papers/2004/wp101.pdf Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: Conceptual issues and methodological challenges. In A. C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 150-197).
  7. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  8. Carvalho, M., Gamboa, L. F., & Waltenberg, F. D. (2012). Equality of educational opportunity employing PISA data: Taking both achievement and access into account. Retrieved from http:// www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2012-277.pdf Chevalier, A., Harmon, C., O'Sullivan, V., & Walker, I. (2005). The impact of parental income and education on the schooling of their children (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1496). Retrieved from http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/49018/1/Document.pdf
  9. Chevalier, A., & Lanot, G. (2002). The relative effect of family characteristics and financial situation on educational ac