In centers that performa high volume of pancreatic surgery and advanced laparoscopic procedures, this surgery can be performedsuccessfully using the appropriate techniques.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has similar oncological outcomes to open pancreaticoduodenec tomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Presently described are 2cases: an 84-year-old man with a tumor in the ampulla of Vater and a 74-year-old woman with distal bileduct cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In centers that performa high volume of pancreatic surgery and advanced laparoscopic procedures, this surgery can be performedsuccessfully using the appropriate techniques.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Özet
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has similar oncological outcomes to open pancreaticoduodenec tomy. As minimally invasive surgery, a laparoscopic procedure is more advantageous in terms of bloodloss, the length of hospital stay, and the occurrence of wound site complications. Presently described are 2cases: an 84-year-old man with a tumor in the ampulla of Vater and a 74-year-old woman with distal bileduct cancer. Both were successfully treated with a laparoscopic Whipple procedure. In centers that performa high volume of pancreatic surgery and advanced laparoscopic procedures, this surgery can be performedsuccessfully using the appropriate techniques.
🔖
Cite This Article
KARAGÜL, S., KARAKÖSE, O. (2018). The fist two laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy cases in the eastern Black Sea region. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 33–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/345162
Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pan creatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 1994;8:408–10. [CrossRef] 2. Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc 2015;29:9–23. [CrossRef] 3. Karagul S, Kayaalp C, Sumer F, Yagci MA. Extramucosal pan creaticojejunostomy at laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenec tomy. J Minim Access Surg 2018;14:76–8. [CrossRef] 4. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreatico duodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complica tions using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215:810–9. [CrossRef] 5. Coates JM, Beal SH, Russo JE, Vanderveen KA, Chen SL, Bold RJ, et al. Negligible effect of selective preoperative bil iary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 2009;144:841–7. [CrossRef] 6. Liu C, Lu JW, Du ZQ, Liu XM, Lv Y, Zhang XF. Association of Preoperative Biliary Drainage with Postoperative Morbidity after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015;2015:796893. [CrossRef] 7. Singh AN, Pal S, Mangla V, Kilambi R, George J, Dash NR, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy: Does the technique matter? A randomized trial. J Surg Oncol 2018;117:389–96. [CrossRef] 8. Shrikhande SV, Sivasanker M, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Bes selink MG, Fingerhut A; International Study Group of Pan creatic Surgery (ISGPS). Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A position statement by the Inter national Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2017;161:1221–34. [CrossRef] 9. Zhang D, Gao J, Li S, Wang F, Zhu J, Leng X. Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy in elderly pa tients. Hepatogastroenterology 2015;62:451–4.