Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric tumor: a single-center experience

Pages
43–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean length of stay in hospital was 9.8 days and the mean follow-up period was9.1 months.Conclusion: Although the number of cases was small and the follow-period was short, the results obtainedfrom laparoscopic surgery applied to patients with a stomach tumor were considered to be compatible withthose of open surgery and with oncology principles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The advantages of minimally invasive surgery compared to open surgery have led to increaseduse in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this paper was toshare the results of laparoscopic gastrectomy performed for stomach tumors.Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed of patients who had a laparoscopic gastrectomy for a gastric tumor in 1 clinic between September 2016 and April 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean length of stay in hospital was 9.8 days and the mean follow-up period was9.1 months.Conclusion: Although the number of cases was small and the follow-period was short, the results obtainedfrom laparoscopic surgery applied to patients with a stomach tumor were considered to be compatible withthose of open surgery and with oncology principles.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: The advantages of minimally invasive surgery compared to open surgery have led to increaseduse in recent years. Although there are concerns that the appropriate oncological results may not be obtained in cases of stomach cancer as a result of technical difficulties, a laparoscopic gastrectomy is oftenpreferred to open gastrectomy. The Far East is currently leading in this field. The aim of this paper was toshare the results of laparoscopic gastrectomy performed for stomach tumors.Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed of patients who had a laparoscopic gastrectomy for a gastric tumor in 1 clinic between September 2016 and April 2018. Patient characteristics, tumorfeatures, surgical approach, postoperative follow-up, and oncological outcomes were evaluated.Results: Gastric resection was performed in 66 patients. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in a totalof 19 patients. Nine patients underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy, 8 patients underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, and laparoscopic wedge resection was performed in 2 cases. In 16 patients,D2 dissection was performed. The surgical margin and lymph node number were found to be compatiblewith oncology principles. In the postoperative period, mortality occurred in 2 patients, and anastomosisleakage in 1 patient. The mean length of stay in hospital was 9.8 days and the mean follow-up period was9.1 months.Conclusion: Although the number of cases was small and the follow-period was short, the results obtainedfrom laparoscopic surgery applied to patients with a stomach tumor were considered to be compatible withthose of open surgery and with oncology principles.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKÖSE, O., KARAGÜL, S., ASLAN, M. S. (2018). Laparoscopic surgery for gastric tumor: a single-center experience. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 43–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/345149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy- -assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146–8
  2. Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc 2005;19:168–73. [CrossRef] 3. Lee JH, Yom CK, Han HS. Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1759–63
  3. Inokuchi M, Nakagawa M, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K, Kojima K. Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2018;32:735–42
  4. Song JH, Choi YY, An JY, Kim DW, Hyung WJ, Noh SH.ShortTerm Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Performed by a Single Surgeon Experienced in Open Gastrectomy: Review of Initial Experience. J Gastric Cancer 2015;15:159–66. [CrossRef] 6. Aktimur R, Cetinkunar S, Yıldırım K, Odabaşı E, Alıcı Ö, Nigdelioğlu A, et al. Initial experience with laparoscopic gastrectomy in a low-volume center. Dicle Med J. 2015;42:12-7
  5. Li G, Hu Y, Liu H. Current status of randomized con¬trolled trials for laparoscopic gastric surgery for gastric cancer in China. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015;8:263-7. [CrossRef] 8. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:1350–7. [CrossRef] 9. Yang XW, Zhu SH, Li PZ, Li WZ, Sun XL. Outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients. J BUON 2018;23:85–91
  6. Antonakis PT, Ashrafian H, Isla AM. Laparoscopic gastric surgery for cancer: where do we stand? World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:14280–91. [CrossRef] 11. Kodera Y, Yoshida K, Kumamaru H, Kakeji Y, Hiki N, Etoh T, et al. Introducing laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in general practice: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide registry database in Japan. Gastric Cancer 2018
  7. Ludwig K, Schneider-Koriath S, Scharlau U, Steffen H, Möller D, Bernhardt J. Totally Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Matched Pair Analysis. Zentralbl Chir 2018;14:145–54. [CrossRef] 13. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, et al; Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. D