Journals / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Early outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with hemi-double stapling technique in gastric cancer

Pages
93–98
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mean length of stay was 10.9±9.8 days, and mean follow-up was 10.1±7 months.Conclusion: HDST appears to be a safe method that can be used in the esophagojejunostomy step of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The most diffiult step of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is esophagojejunostomy anastomosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to present the outcomes of our patients who underwent esophagojejunostomy using the hemi-double stapling technique (HDST).Materials and Methods: Patients who had laparoscopic surgery due to gastric cancer in our hospital between October 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mean length of stay was 10.9±9.8 days, and mean follow-up was 10.1±7 months.Conclusion: HDST appears to be a safe method that can be used in the esophagojejunostomy step of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: The most diffiult step of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is esophagojejunostomy anastomosis. Although various techniques are recommended for this anastomosis, there is no standard method. This study aims to present the outcomes of our patients who underwent esophagojejunostomy using the hemi-double stapling technique (HDST).Materials and Methods: Patients who had laparoscopic surgery due to gastric cancer in our hospital between October 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with HDST were included in this study. The patients’ clinical characteristics and histopathologicaldata were evaluated. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were documented. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, specimen extraction site, day of oral intake, length of stay, postoperative complications, and mortality were evaluated.Results: A total of 13 patients (eight male, fie female) were included in this study. The mean age was 63.3±15.8 years, and mean BMI was 26.4±6.8 kg/m2. ASA score was ASA III in seven patients (54%), ASA II in three patients (23%), and ASA I in the remaining three patients (23%). Mean operative time was 222.7±39.6minutes, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 97.3±52.4 mL. There were no complications related to esophagojejunostomy. A mean of 23.8±11.1 lymph nodes was removed, of which a mean of 10.8±11.9 were tumor-positive. Mean length of stay was 10.9±9.8 days, and mean follow-up was 10.1±7 months.Conclusion: HDST appears to be a safe method that can be used in the esophagojejunostomy step of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGÜL, S., KARAKÖSE, O. (2019). Early outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with hemi-double stapling technique in gastric cancer. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 93–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/345120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87–108
  2. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy- -assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146–8
  3. Lee JH, Lee CM, Son SY, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: longterm oncologic results. Surgery 2014;155:154–64
  4. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report-a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 2010;251:417–20
  5. Kawaguchi Y, Shiraishi K, Akaike H, Ichikawa D. Current status of laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2018;3:14–23
  6. Umemura A, Koeda K, Sasaki A, Fujiwara H, Kimura Y, Iwaya T, et al. Totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: literature review and comparison of the procedure of esophagojejunostomy. Asian J Surg 2015;38:102–12
  7. Shim JH, Yoo HM, Oh SI, Nam MJ, Jeon HM, Park CH, et al. Various types of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2013;16:420–7
  8. Sugiyama M, Oki E, Ogaki K, Morita M, Sakaguchi Y, Koga S, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Esophagojejunostomy in Totally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017;27:e87–e91
  9. Ali B, Park CH, Song KY. Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using hemi-double-stapling technique after laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Treat Res 2017;92:30–4
  10. Wang H, Hao Q, Wang M, Feng M, Wang F, Kang X, et al. Esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy by OrVil™ or hemi-double stapling technique. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:8943–51
  11. Chen QY, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, et al. Which method is more suitable for advanced gastric cancer with enlarged lymph nodes, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy or open gastrectomy? Gastric Cancer 2018;21:853–63
  12. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:627–33
  13. Ahn SH, Kang SH, Lee Y, Min SH, Park YS, Park DJ, et al. Long-term Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Five-year Re