SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mühendis ve Makina / 2021 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 703

Investigation of the Effect of Green Roof Application on Heating Requırement and Environmental Emissions for a Sample Building

Yeşil Çatı Uygulamasının Örnek Bir Bina İçin Isıtma İhtiyacı ve Çevre Emisyonlarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Doğan Burak SAYDAM
COŞKUN ÖZALP
ERTAÇ HÜRDOĞAN
Cemre POLAT
Enes KAVUN
Pages
204–220
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For indoor 19 °C, 15161.80 kg CO2 for the first-degree day zone, 32484.27 kgCO2 for the second-degree day zone, 19344.34 kg CO2 for the first-degree day zone for the indoor temperature 21 °C, and the temperature for the second-degree day zone a reduction of 36246.31 kg CO2 was achieved compared to the thermally non-insulated situation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of green roof application on heating requirement, environmental emissions and fuel cost in two different cities located in different degree day zones was examined at two different indoor temperatures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the indoor temperature is 19°C, there is no need for heating requirement in the second degree day zone in May and September.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For indoor 19 °C, 15161.80 kg CO2 for the first-degree day zone, 32484.27 kgCO2 for the second-degree day zone, 19344.34 kg CO2 for the first-degree day zone for the indoor temperature 21 °C, and the temperature for the second-degree day zone a reduction of 36246.31 kg CO2 was achieved compared to the thermally non-insulated situation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çevre · yeşil çatı · ısı yalıtımı

Abstract

In this study, the effect of green roof application on heating requirement, environmental emissions and fuel cost in two different cities located in different degree day zones was examined at two different indoor temperatures. Heating requirement, monthly fuel cost and emission values have been determined for the condition of the building without heat insulation and with heat insulation and green roof. In addition, by performing an economic analysis, the payback period of the investment has been calculated with thermal insulation and green roof application. When the indoor temperature is 19°C, there is no need for heating requirement in the second degree day zone in May and September. However, if the indoor temperature is 21°C, there was a need for heating requirement in May and September. For indoor 19 °C, 15161.80 kg CO2 for the first-degree day zone, 32484.27 kgCO2 for the second-degree day zone, 19344.34 kg CO2 for the first-degree day zone for the indoor temperature 21 °C, and the temperature for the second-degree day zone a reduction of 36246.31 kg CO2 was achieved compared to the thermally non-insulated situation.

Özet

Bu çalışmada farklı derece gün bölgelerinde yer alan iki farklı şehirdeki yeşil çatı uygulamasının ısıtma ihtiyacına, çevre emisyonlarına ve yakıt maliyetine etkisi iki farklı iç ortam sıcaklıklarında incelenmiştir. Binanın, ısı yalıtımsız, ısı yalıtımlı ve yeşil çatılı olma durumları için ısıtma ihtiyacı, aylık yakıt maliyeti ve emisyon değerleri belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca ekonomik analiz yapılarak ısı yalıtımı ve yeşil çatı uygulaması ile yatırımın geri ödeme süresi hesaplanmıştır. İç ortam sıcaklığı 19°C olduğu durumda ikinci gün bölgesinde mayıs ve eylül aylarında ısıtma ihtiyacına gerek duyulmazken, iç ortam sıcaklığı 21°C olduğu durumda mayıs ve eylül aylarında ısıtma ihtiyacına gerek duyulmuştur. İç ortam 19°C için birinci gün bölgesi için 15161.80 kg CO2, ikinci gün bölgesi için ise 32484.27 kg CO2’lik, iç ortam sıcaklığının 21°C kabul edilmesi durumu için birinci gün bölgesi için 19344.34 kg CO2, ikinci gün bölgesi için ise ısı yalıtımsız duruma göre 36246.31 kgCO2’lik bir azaltma gerçekleştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYDAM, D. B., ÖZALP, C., HÜRDOĞAN, E., POLAT, C., KAVUN, E. (2021). Investigation of the Effect of Green Roof Application on Heating Requırement and Environmental Emissions for a Sample Building. Mühendis ve Makina, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 703, 204–220. https://ajindex.com/articles/340850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ozalp, C., Saydam, D. B., Çerçi, K. N., Hürdoğan, E., Moran, H. 2019. “Evaluation of a sample building with different type building elements in an energetic and environmental perspective,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 115. Dylewski, R., Adamczyk, J. 2011. “Economic and environmental benefits of thermal insulation of building external walls,” Build. Environ., vol. 46(12), p. 2615–2623.
  2. Cholewa, T., Balaras, C. A., Nižetić, S., Siuta-Olcha, A. 2020. “On calculated and actual energy savings from thermal building renovations – Long term field evaluation of multifamily buildings,” Energy Build., vol. 223. Bektas Ekici, B., Aytac Gulten, A., Aksoy, U. T. 2012. “A study on the optimum insulation thicknesses of various types of external walls with respect to different materials, fuels and climate zones in Turkey,” Appl. Energy, vol. 92, p. 211–217.
  3. Koyun, T, Koç, E. 2017. “Bir Binanın Değişken Cam ve Dış Duvar Tiplerine Göre Pencere/Duvar Alanı Oranlarının Bina Isı Kayıplarına Etkisi,” Mühendis ve Makina, 58 (688), 1-14.
  4. Tong, J. C. K., Tse, J. M. Y., Jones, P. J. 2018. “Development of thermal evaluation tool for detached houses in Mongolia,” Energy Build., vol. 173, p. 81–90.
  5. Saadatian, O., Sopian, K., Salleh, E., Lim, C. H., Riffat, S., Saadatian, E., Toudeshki, A., Sulaiman, M. Y. 2013. “A review of energy aspects of green roofs”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 23, p. 155–168.
  6. Karachaliou, P., Santamouris, M., Pangalou, H. 2016. “Experimental and numerical analysis of the energy performance of a large scale intensive green roof system installed on an office building in Athens,” Energy Build., vol. 114, p. 256–264.
  7. Jim, C. Y. 2017. “An archaeological and historical exploration of the origins of green roofs.” Urban For. Urban Green., vol. 27, p. 32–42.
  8. Mungur, M., Poorun, Y., Juggurnath, D., Ruhomally, Y. B., Rughooputh, R., Dauhoo, M. Z., Khoodaruth, A., Shamachurn, H., Gooroochurn, M., Boodia, N., Chooneea, M., Facknath, S. 2020. “A numerical and experimental investigation of the effectiveness of green roofs in tropical environments: The case study of Mauritius in mid and late winter.” Energy, vol. 202. Tsang, S. W., Jim, C. Y. 2013. “A stochastic model to optimize forecast and fulfillment of green roof demand,” Urban For. Urban Green., vol. 12(1), p. 53–60. Brandão, C., Cameira, M. do R., Valente, F., Cruz de Carvalho, R., Paço, T. A. 2017. “Wet season hydrological performance of green roofs using native species under Mediterranean climate,” Ecol. En