Journals / YASAMA DERGİSİ / 2013 / Sayı: 24

What Is The Constitutional Convention? An Attempt to Offer A Definition For The “Unwritten Rules Of The Constitution”

Anayasal Teamül Nedir? “Yazısız Anayasa” Kuralları İçin Bir Tanımlama Denemesi

Pages
37–58
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also in this study there will be a comparative and analytical explanation of the concept by the help of diverse Turkish, English, French, American and Canadian authors, which will then serve as a conceptual framework for further research and discussions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study deals with the concept of the constitutional convention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Constitutional conventions may be subsumed under the notion unwritten rules of the constitution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also in this study there will be a comparative and analytical explanation of the concept by the help of diverse Turkish, English, French, American and Canadian authors, which will then serve as a conceptual framework for further research and discussions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study deals with the concept of the constitutional convention. Constitutional conventions may be subsumed under the notion unwritten rules of the constitution. Therefore in the first place, we will note that constitutional conventions are not legal rules per se and their study should be made in connection with the concept of political legitimacy. Following on, we will build the rapport between the law and the convention: one may refer to the conventions in the case of a legal void or the indeterminacy of a legal text. Also in this study there will be a comparative and analytical explanation of the concept by the help of diverse Turkish, English, French, American and Canadian authors, which will then serve as a conceptual framework for further research and discussions.

Özet

Bu çalışma anayasal teamül kavramını incelemektedir. Anayasal teamüller, yazısız anayasa kuralları olgusu çerçevesinde ele alınır. Bu çerçevede ilk olarak anayasal teamülün aslında bir hukuk kuralı olmadığı, ancak siyasi meşruluk kavramı ile bağlantılı bir biçimde tartışılması gerektiği savunulmaktadır. Sonrasında ise anayasal teamülün hukukla ilişkisi hukuki boşluk veya belirsizlik noktasında kurulmaktadır. Anayasal teamül kavramı, Türk, İngiliz, Fransız, ABD ve Kanada kaynaklı yazarlardan örnek tanımlarla karşılaştırmalı bir şekilde açıklanacak ve yine verilecek karşılaştırmalı örneklerle; anayasal teamüllere ilişkin daha ileri araştırma ve tartışmalara bir katkıda bulunmak amacıyla kavramsal bir çerçeve oluşturulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, İ. G. (2013). What Is The Constitutional Convention? An Attempt to Offer A Definition For The “Unwritten Rules Of The Constitution”. YASAMA DERGİSİ, Sayı: 24, 37–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/334946

References (20)

  1. Ardant, Philippe. Institutions Politiques & Droit Constitutionnel. 17. Paris: L.G.D.J., 2005.
  2. Avril, Pierre. Les conventions de la constitution: normes non écrites du droit politique. Paris: PUF, 1997.
  3. Aybay, Aydın, ve Rona Aybay. Hukuka Giriş. 5. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2008.
  4. Başgil, Ali Fuad. Hukukun Ana Mesele ve Müesseseleri. İstanbul: Hak Kitabevi, 1946.
  5. Barnett, Hilaire. Constitutional & Adminsitrative Law. 6. London: Routledge, 2006.
  6. Beaud, Olivier. “Le droit constitutionnel par_delà le texte constitutionnel et la jurisprudence constitutionnelle _ A propos d’un ouvrage récent.” no. 6 (1999): 1-13.
  7. Beaud, Olivier. “Propos sceptiques sur la légitimité d’un référendum Européen ou plaidoyer pour plus de réalisme constitutionnel.” Le Référendum Européen içinde, düzenleyen A. Auer ve J. F. Flauss, 125-180. Bruxelles, 1997.
  8. Beetham, David. Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan, 1991.
  9. Bilge, Necip. Hukuk Başlangıcı Hukukun Temel Kavram ve Kurumları. 16. İstanbul: Turhan Kitabevi, 2002.
  10. Bobbio, Norberto. Democracy and Dictatorship: The Nature and Limits of State Power. İngilizce’ye çeviren: Peter Kennealy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989.
  11. Bortwick, R.L. “What has Happened to the Sovereignty of Parliament?.” Reclaiming Sovereignty içinde, düzenleyen Laura Brace and John Hoffman, 26-41. London: Pinter, 1997.
  12. Bowers, Paul. “The Sewel Convention.” Birleşik Krallık Parlamentosu Resmi Sitesi. 2005. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-02084.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: Ocak 29, 2013).
  13. Buchanan, Allen. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  14. Carroll, Alex. Constitutional Administrative Law. Harlow: Pearson-Longman, 2003.
  15. Chander, Anupam. “Sovereignty, Referenda, and the Entrenchment of a United Kingdom Bill of Rights.” Yale Law Journal 101 (1991): 457-480.
  16. Çağlar, Bakır. Anayasa Bilimi Bir Çalışma Taslağı. İstanbul: BFS Yayınları, 1989.
  17. Dicey, A.V. Introduction to the Law of the Constitution. Adamant Media Corporation, [1902] 2005.
  18. Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
  19. Easton, David. “An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems.” World Politics 9, no. 3 (April 1957): 383-400.
  20. Fallon, Jr.Richard H. “Judicial Legitimacy and The Unwritten Constitution: A Comment on Miranda and Dickerson.” New York School of Law Review 45, no. 119-140 (2