The analysis of surgical materials usedpercutaneous nefrolithotomy surgery in

Key Findings & Data:PCNL in parallel with developments in technology, the development of tools and equipment used in surgery, increase the safety and efficacy of PCNL procedure.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:In this review, PCNL surgery tools and equipment used in the literature are analyzed.

🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey

📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample

⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been widely used in the treatment of kidney stones. PCNL in parallel with developments in technology, the development of tools and equipment used in surgery, increase the safety and efficacy of PCNL procedure. In this review, PCNL surgery tools and equipment used in the literature are analyzed.

Özet

Perkütan nefrolitotomi (PCNL) böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Teknolojinin gelişimine paralel olarak PCNL ameliyatında kullanılan araç ve gereçlerin gelişmesi, PCNL işleminin güvenirliliğini ve etkinliğini arttırmaktadır. Bu derlemede PCNL ameliyatında kullanılan araç ve gereçlerin literatür eşliğinde analizi yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, M. B., KARAKÖSE, A., PİRİNÇÇİ, N. (2013). The analysis of surgical materials usedpercutaneous nefrolithotomy surgery in. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 194–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/334149

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10(3):257-259. 2. Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Lingeman JE. Improving outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Access. EAU Update Series 2005; 3:37-43. 3. Hofmann R, Olbert P, Weber J, Wille S, Varga Z. Clinical experience with a new ultrasonic and LithoClast combination for percutaneous litholapaxy. BJU Int 2002; 90(1):16-19. 4. Haupt G, Haupt A. In vitro comparison of 4 ultrasound lithotripsy devices. J Urol 2003; 170(5):1731-1733. 5. Coats EC. The application of ultrasonic energy to urinary and biliary calculi. J Urol 1956; 75(5):865-874. 6. Kim SC, Matlaga BR, Tinmouth WW, Kuo RL, Evan AP, McAteer JA, et al. In vitro assessment of a novel dual probe ultrasonic intracorporeal lithotriptor. J Urol 2007; 177(4):1363-1365. 7. Soucy F, Ko R, Denstedt JD, Razvi H. Occupational noise exposure during endourologic procedures. J Endourol 2008; 22(8):1609-1611. 8. Rane A, Kommu SS, Kandaswamy SV, Rao P, Aron M, Kumar R, et al. Initial clinical evaluation of a new pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripter. BJU Int 2007; 100(3):629-632. 9. A 60-year milestone for Karl Storz company. J Endourol 2005; 19(8):952-954. 10. Andonian S, Okeke Z, Anidjar M, Smith AD. Digital nephroscopy: the next step. J Endourol 2008; 22(4):601-602. 11. Ahmed M, Pedro RN, Kieley S, Akornor JW, Durfee WK, Monga M. Systematic evaluation of ureteral occlusion devices: insertion, deployment, stone migration, and extraction. Urology 2009; 73(5):976-980. 12. Wosnitzer M, Xavier K, Gupta M. Novel use of a ureteroscopic stone entrapment device to prevent antegrade stone migration during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009; 23(2):203-207. 13. Hoffman N, Lukasewycz SJ, Canales B, Botnaru A, Slaton JW, Monga M. Percutaneous renal stone extraction: in vitro study of retrieval devices. J Urol 2004; 172(2):559-561.