Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2010 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

The applicability of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in provincial state hospitals: the experience of the State Hospital of Mu􀃼 in first 100 cases

Perkütan nefrolitotominin taşra hastanelerinde uygulanabilirliği: Muş Devlet Hastanesi’nin ilk 100 vakadaki deneyimi

Pages
362–368
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was seen that the urologists in peripheral state hospitals could perform PCN operation with similar results to the literature, if they have adequate surgical equipment and training.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to evaluate if percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) operation, which is commonly and successfully performed in current practice, could be performed in provincial state hospitals of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Between March 2008-June 2010, 100 PCN operations, which were performed in Urology Clinic of The State Hospital of MUŞ, were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was seen that the urologists in peripheral state hospitals could perform PCN operation with similar results to the literature, if they have adequate surgical equipment and training.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate if percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) operation, which is commonly and successfully performed in current practice, could be performed in provincial state hospitals of Turkey. Materials and methods: Between March 2008-June 2010, 100 PCN operations, which were performed in Urology Clinic of The State Hospital of MUŞ, were retrospectively evaluated. All patients were assessed by routine urine test, urine culture, serum biochemical and coagulation tests, direct urinary system radiography (DUSR) and ultrasonography. In 2nd or 3rd days after the operation, all patients were undergone DUSR routinely. If a patients had significant residual stone ≥4 mm, the patient was directed towards extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment. Results: The sample included 47 women and 53 men with a mean age of 44.1 (24-63), and the mean stone burden was 4.33 (2-10) cm2. The total success rate was 86% (86). The mean operation time was 102.4 (55-210) minutes. Blood transfusion was performed in 9 cases. 4 patients had postoperatively fever >38°C were managed by follow up and antibiotherapy. Although none of the patients had intraabdominal organ injury or the requirement of open surgery, one patient had pneumothorax. Conclusion: PCN is a successfull treatment modality that should by the first choice of the treatment of renal stones >2 cm² with higher stone free rates, lower duration of hospital stay, and acceptable complication rates. It was seen that the urologists in peripheral state hospitals could perform PCN operation with similar results to the literature, if they have adequate surgical equipment and training.

Özet

Amaç: Günümüzde başarılı ve sık olarak uygulanan perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) operasyonunun Türkiye’de taşra devlet hastanelerinde uygulanabilirliğini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntem: Mart 2008 ile Haziran 2010 tarihleri arasında Muş Devlet Hastanesi Üroloji kliniğinde uygulanan 100 PNL işlemi retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar ameliyat öncesinde rutin olarak tam idrar tetkiki, idrar kültürü, serum biyokimyası, kanama ve pıhtılaşma zamanı, direkt üriner sistem grafisi (DÜSG) ve ultrasonografi ile değerlendirildi. Hastalara ameliyattan 2 veya 3 gün sonra rutin olarak DÜSG çekildi. İşlemler sonrası ≥4 mm boyuttaki taş varlığı rezidü olarak kabul edilip vücut dışı taş kırmaya (ESWL) yönlendirildi. Bulgular: PNL uygulanan 100 hastanın 47’si kadın, 53’ü erkek olup; yaş ortalaması 44. 1 (24-63) ve ortalama taş yükü 4.33 (2-10) cm² olarak belirlendi. Toplam başarı oranı %86(86) olarak saptandı. Ortalama operasyon ortalama girişim süresi 102. 4 (55-210) dakikaydı. 9 olguda (%9) kan transfüzyonu yapıldı. 4 hastada (%4) saptanan operasyon sonrası >38°C ateş yüksekliği medikal tedavi ve takip ile geriledi. Hastalarımızın hiçbirisinde batın içi organ yaralanması ya da açık cerrahi gereksinimi ile karşılaşılmazken, bir hastamızda pnömotoraks meydana geldi. Sonuç: Perkütan renal cerrahi yüksek taşsızlık oranı, kısa hastanede kalış süresi ve kabul edilebilir yan etki oranları ile 2 cm²’den büyük böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde ilk sırada tercih edilmesi gereken başarılı bir yöntemdir. Uygun cerrahi donanım olması ve eğitim almaları şartıyla ürologların perifer hastanelerinde de literatüre yakın sonuçlarla PNL operasyonunu uygulayabileceği görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, M. B., KAR, A., ÇİLOĞLU, M. (2010). The applicability of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in provincial state hospitals: the experience of the State Hospital of Mu􀃼 in first 100 cases. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 362–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/328174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akıncı M, Esen T, Tellaloğlu S. Urinary stone disease in Turkey: an updated epidemiological study. Eur Urol 1991
  2. PMID: 1823043 2. Fernström I, Johannson B. Percutaneous pyelithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976
  3. Tanrıverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M, Kadıhasanoğlu M, Horasanlı K, Miroğlu C. The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007
  4. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.001 PMid:17229522 4. Ramakumar S, Segura JW. Renal calculi: percutaneous management. Urol Clin North Am 2000
  5. doi:10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70111-7 5. Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Galluci M. EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2001
  6. doi:10.1159/000049803 PMid:11713390 6. Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Curry T, Redman HC, Peters PC. Outpatient percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 1986
  7. PMid:3735494 7. Wolf SJ, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephros-tolithotomy: What is its role in 1997? Urol Clin North Ame 1997
  8. doi:10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70353-0 8. Aras N, Kadıoğlu A, Müslümanoğlu AY, Ersay AR. Perkütan nefrolitotomi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 1989
  9. Yalçın V, Önder AU, Kalkan M. Böb-rek taşı tedavisinde 463 perkütan nefrolitotomi uygulaması. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2002
  10. Kongre Özel Sayısı:p62. 10. Lee WJ, Smith AD, Cubelli V, Vernace FM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: analysis of 500 consecutive patients. Urol Radiol 1986
  11. doi:10.1007/BF02924078 PMid:3787875 11. Payne SR, Ford TF, Wickham JEA. Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract stones. Br J Surg 1985
  12. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800721016 PMid:4041714 12. Yalçın V, Önder U, Demirkesen O, Önal B, Kalkan M, Kural AR. Böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde perkütan nefrolitotomi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2002
  13. Ünsal A, Çimentepe E, Sağlam R. İlk 50 perkütan nefrolitotomi deneyimimiz. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2002
  14. Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, et al. Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1987
  15. PMid:3625845 15. Pearle MS, Clayman RV. Outcomes and selection of surgical therapies of stones in the kidney and ureter. In: Coe FL, Favus MJ, Pak CYC, Parks JH, Preminger GM, editors. Kidney stones: medical and surgical management. 1995. p. 709-55, 16. Tuğrul ME, İnci K, Tombul T, Özden E, Taşar Ç, Şahin A. Geyik boynuzu (staghorn) taşlarının tedavisi: 19