Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2008 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Definition of success with SEAPI-QMM quality of life ındex after tension free vaginal tape procedure: does validation of score sheet in patient's own language effect the outcome?

Pages
209–214
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After the scoring system was validated and the cut-off values were detected according to the results, Group II patients were reevaluated 1 and 6 months after surgery with the same questionnaire and pad testing.Results: The total score of SEAPI-QMM quality of life index was determined to range from zero to 45.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: We evaluate the importance of the validation of the SEAPI-QMM quality of life index in patient’s own language to determine the outcome of tension-free vaginal tape operation (TVT®) for stress urinary incontinence.Materials and Methods: SEAPI-QMM quality of life index was translated into Turkish.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group I consisted of 50 controls Turkish speaking women who were referred consecutively to the clinic for evaluation of diagnoses unrelated to incontinence.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After the scoring system was validated and the cut-off values were detected according to the results, Group II patients were reevaluated 1 and 6 months after surgery with the same questionnaire and pad testing.Results: The total score of SEAPI-QMM quality of life index was determined to range from zero to 45.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluate the importance of the validation of the SEAPI-QMM quality of life index in patient’s own language to determine the outcome of tension-free vaginal tape operation (TVT®) for stress urinary incontinence.Materials and Methods: SEAPI-QMM quality of life index was translated into Turkish. Patients with stress urinary incontinence and healthy controls were asked to fill out the Turkish version of SEAPI-QMM quality of life index scoring form. Group I consisted of 50 controls Turkish speaking women who were referred consecutively to the clinic for evaluation of diagnoses unrelated to incontinence. The mean age of those patients was 27 (range 22-55). Group II consisted of 48 Turkish speaking women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence who were planed to undergo TVT® operation with a mean age of 54.8 (range 35-79). Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) plots were used to define the detecting cut off or threshold score and Youden`s index was used to detect the best reflecting optimal sensitivity and specificity. After the scoring system was validated and the cut-off values were detected according to the results, Group II patients were reevaluated 1 and 6 months after surgery with the same questionnaire and pad testing.Results: The total score of SEAPI-QMM quality of life index was determined to range from zero to 45. The mean scores were 0.34 (range 0-3) and 23.5 (range 7- 43) in groups I and II, respectively. A patient with a score of four or greater had a disrupted quality of life leading to treatment seeking behavior, with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity in our patient population. The difference between cut-off values of 4 and 6 of Turkish or original version, respectively, would not change the interpretation of success in patients who underwent tension-free vaginal tape operation (TVT®). To note is that four of 14 patients (28%) who reported dry after the operation also reported a score of more than the cut-off values.Conclusion: Although there is minimal difference between cut-off values of English and Turkish version of SEAPI-QMM quality of life index, it would not effect the interpretation of success after the tension-free vaginal tape operation. Small number of patients may report inconsistent results between the SEAPI-QMM quality of life index score and incontinence episodes; this might effect the interpretation of success after surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

TİNAY, İ., AKBAL, C., İLKER, Y., TARCAN, T., GENÇ, Y. (2022). Definition of success with SEAPI-QMM quality of life ındex after tension free vaginal tape procedure: does validation of score sheet in patient's own language effect the outcome?. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 209–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/643328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Latthe PM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P: Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary inconti- nence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effecti- veness and complications. BJOG. 114: 522-31, 2007
  2. Blaivas JG, Appell RA, Fantl JA, et al: Standards of ef- ficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary in- continence: Recommendations of the Urodynamic Socie- ty. Neurourol Urodyn. 16: 145-147, 1997
  3. Corcos J, Beaulieu S, Donovan J, et al: Quality of life assessment in men and women with urinary incontinence. J Urol. 168: 896-905, 2002
  4. Jenkinson C, Wright L, Coulter A: Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res 3: 7-12, 1994
  5. Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, et al: Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for uri- nary incontinence in women: The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neuro- urol Urodyn. 14: 131-139, 1995
  6. Raz S and Erickson DR: SEAPI QMM incontinence classification system. Neurourol Urodyn. 11: 187-192, 1992
  7. Nilsson CG, Kuuva N, Falconer C, et al: Long-term re- sults of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT®) procedure for surgical treatment of female stress urinary inconti- nence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Suppl 2: 5-8, 2001
  8. Stothers L: Reliability, validity, and gender differences in the quality of life index of the SEAPI-QMM inconti- nence classification system. Neurourol Urodyn. 23: 223- 8, 2004
  9. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A: Incontinen- ce Pub Health Publications Ltd. Evidence based book based on 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence, Monaco, 2005
  10. Akbal C, Genc Y, Burgu B, et al: Dysfunctional voi- ding and incontinence scoring system: Quantitative eva- luation of incontinence symptoms in pediatric population. J Urol 173: 969-73, 2005
  11. Çetinel B, Özkan B, Can G: The validation study of ICIQ-SF Turkish version. Turkish Journal of Urology 30: 332-338, 2004
  12. Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Cam M, Karateke A: Valida- tion of the short forms of the incontinence impact questi- onnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population Neurourol Urodyn. 26: 129-33, 2007
  13. Avery KN, Bosch JL, Gotoh M, Naughton M, Jackson S, Radley SC, Valiquette L, Batista J, Donovan JL: Questionnaires to assess urinary and anal incontinence: Review and recommendations. J Urol. 177: 39-49, 2007.