SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2014 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3

The young urologists' academic problems in the context of law and ethics

Ozan EFESOY
Pages
161–169
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to raise awarenessabout the problems of young urologists during academic life in the context of law and medical ethics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The European Association of Urology defnes a young urologist as an urologist under the age of 40 or the urolo -gist who has completed their residency within the last 5 years, irrespective of their current academic position.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thetime interval between the residency and higher specialization in urology is an important time period for them tolearn how to stand on their feet and realize their plans of academic career.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to raise awarenessabout the problems of young urologists during academic life in the context of law and medical ethics.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The European Association of Urology defnes a young urologist as an urologist under the age of 40 or the urolo -gist who has completed their residency within the last 5 years, irrespective of their current academic position. Thetime interval between the residency and higher specialization in urology is an important time period for them tolearn how to stand on their feet and realize their plans of academic career. Young urologists who want academictransition have encountered various problems nowadays in Turkey. The aim of this review is to raise awarenessabout the problems of young urologists during academic life in the context of law and medical ethics.

🔖

Cite This Article

EFESOY, O. (2022). The young urologists' academic problems in the context of law and ethics. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 3, 161–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/643326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. TTB-UDEK- Working Groups. VIII. Report of the General Meet- ing. TTB-UDEK Bulletin [Article in Turkish]. 2011;6:75-92
  2. Tura M, Tura B. Investigation of depression in physicians perform- ing their compulsory health services. In: XXIV. National Congress of Psychiatric, and Neurological Sciences Free Presentations. An - kara: GATA Matbaası; 1998
  3. Taycan O, Erdoğan Taycan S, Çelik C. The impact of compulsory health service on physicians and burnout in a province in Eastern Anatolia. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2013;24:182-91
  4. Sezer Y, Bilgin H. Judicial Auditing of Oral Examinations. TBB Dergisi 2009;86:168-87
  5. The Judgement of the 8. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 9.13. 1989 and numbered E: 1989/302,K: 1989/671 (www. danistay.gov.tr
  6. The Judgement of the 8. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 9.20. 2004 and numbered E: 2004/341, K:2004/3332 (www. danistay.gov.tr
  7. The Judgement of the 8. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 12.10. 2003 and numbered E: 2003/2058, K: 2003/5408. (www.danistay.gov.tr
  8. Yılmaz T. Legal issues in oral exams in the appointment of judges, and prosecutors matter. TBB Dergisi 2011;93:35-52
  9. The Judgement of the 5. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 5.21. 2008, numbered E:2007/1771, K: 2008/3008 Danıştay Dergisi 2008;119:191-4
  10. The Judgement of the 12. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 6.9. 2008 and numbered E: 2008/535, k: 2008/3422 Danıştay Dergisi 2008;119:407-9
  11. Judgement of the Plenary Session of the Chambers for Adminis - trative Cases dated 11.13. 2008, and numbered E: 2008/774, K:. (www.danistay.gov.tr
  12. Tekinsoy MA, Mısır MB. Beginning Phase in The Process of Ap - pointment to an Academic Position, additional provisions, and jury reports. AUHFD 2012;61:351-82
  13. Judgements of the 8. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 9.27. 2010, numbered E: 2010/3384, K: 2010/4726 Danıştay Dergisi 2010;125:281-3
  14. Judgement of Sivas District Administrative Court dated Feb 6, 2013, and numbered E: 2011/1989, K:. (www.sivasbim.adalet.gov. tr
  15. The Judgement of the 8. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 1. 6. 1992, and numbered E: 1991/2026, K: 1992/1122. (www.danistay.gov.tr
  16. The Judgement of the 8. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 27.2.2006, numbered E.2004/6289, K.2006/735 (www.dani- stay.gov.tr
  17. The Judgement of the 8. Chamber of the Turkish Council of State dated 4.7. 2010, and numbered E:.2009/10005, K: