SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Radikal Prostatektomi Sonrası Uzamış Drenaj: Üretral Anastomozun Batın Dreni Tarafından Perforasyonu

Mehmet Bilgehan YÜKSEL
Bilal GÜMÜŞ
Volkan TATLI
Pages
335–338
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It should be considered that prolonged drainage following RRP can occur related to the perforation of VUA by surgical drain

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We presented a case of prolonged drainage following RRP related to the perforation of vesicourethral anastamosis (VUA) by drain and the management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At postoperatively 2nd day, the drainage increased and 1500 ml/ day drained during 15 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It should be considered that prolonged drainage following RRP can occur related to the perforation of VUA by surgical drain
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar perforasyon · kaçak · Prostate cancer

Abstract

We presented a case of prolonged drainage following RRP related to the perforation of vesicourethral anastamosis (VUA) by drain and the management. Sixty seven years old man underwent RRP. After the anastomosis, a surgical drain was placed. At postoperatively 2nd day, the drainage increased and 1500 ml/ day drained during 15 days. Subsequent cystography and cystoscopy revealed that the problem was the perforation of anastomosis by surgical drain. The drainage decreased after pulling out the drain 2-3 cm. It should be considered that prolonged drainage following RRP can occur related to the perforation of VUA by surgical drain

Özet

Kliniğimizde radikal retropubik prostatektomi (RRP) sonrası uzamış drenajı olan hastada tanı ve tedavi yaklaşımımızı aktarmayı amaçladık. Lokalize prostat adeno kanseri tanılı 67 yaşındaki hastaya RRP yapıldı. Anastomoz sonrası kaçak olmadığı kontrol edildi. Bir adet dren koyularak operasyon sonlandırıldı. Postoperatif 2. gün dreninden geleni artan ve 15 gün boyunca yaklaşık 1500ml/ gün geleni olan hastaya sistografi ve sonrasında sistoskopi yapıldığında problemin batın dreninin anastomoz hattını perfore etmesi olduğu belirlendi. Dren 2-3 cm geriye geri çekildiğinde durumun hızlı şekilde düzeldiği görüldü. RRP sonrası görülebilen uzamış drenajın, batına drenin anastomoz hattını perfore ederek içeriye girmesi sonucu oluşabileceği göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, M. B., GÜMÜŞ, B., TATLI, V. (2014). Radikal Prostatektomi Sonrası Uzamış Drenaj: Üretral Anastomozun Batın Dreni Tarafından Perforasyonu. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 335–338. https://ajindex.com/articles/205350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Eden CG. Minimal access radical prostatectomy: how is it shaping up. BJU Int 2008;101(7):791-2.
  2. Kostakopoulos A, Argiropoulos V, Protogerou V, et al. Vesicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical retropubic prostatectomy. The experience of a single institution. Urol Int 2004;72(1):17-20.
  3. Kylmala T, Kaipia A, Matikainen M. Management of prolonged urinary leakage at the urethra-vesical anastomosis. Urol Int 2005;74(4):298-300.
  4. Meraney AM, Haese A, Palisaar J, et al. Surgical management of prostate cancer: advances based on a rational approach to the data. Eur J Cancer 2005;41(6):888-907.
  5. Ryan CJ, Small EJ. Advances in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2004;16(3):242-6. Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolu- tion 1998;160(6):2418-24. technique. J Urol Andriole GL, Smith DS, Rao G, et al. Early complica- tions of contemporary anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1994;152(5):1858-60.
  6. Zincke H, Oesterling JE, Blute ML, et al. Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate can- cer. J Urol 1994;152(5):1850-7.
  7. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC. Radical prostatec- tomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomi- cal and pathological considerations. Prostate 1983;4(5):473-85.
  8. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Cutillo G, et al. A randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drain- age with no drainage after lymphadenectomy in gy- necologic 1997;65(3):478-82.
  9. Gynecol Oncol Niesel T, Partin AW, Walsh PC. Anatomic ap