Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2001 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Malleable penile prosthesis implantation in the treatment of impotence

Empotans tedavisinde bükülebilir tip penil protez uygulanması

Pages
70–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Penile prosthesis were extracted in 3 patients (2.82%) because of complication.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Penile prosthesis implantation is most effective and popular method in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In between 1990-1999, malleable penile prosthesis were applied in our clinic to 106 patients (ages 24-65, mean 54) with erectile dysfunction due to different etiologies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Penile prosthesis were extracted in 3 patients (2.82%) because of complication.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar · Penis implantasyonu · Penis protezleri

Abstract

Penile prosthesis implantation is most effective and popular method in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. In between 1990-1999, malleable penile prosthesis were applied in our clinic to 106 patients (ages 24-65, mean 54) with erectile dysfunction due to different etiologies. Urethral rupture was seen in 1 patient (0.94%), glans erosion in 1 patient (0.94%) and flaccid glans in 3 patients. Prosthesis implantation was unsuccessful in 1 patient (0.94%) due to fibrosis in corporal bodies postoperative infection was seen 2 patient (1.88%) easy usage, cost effectiveness and no mechanical problems were imported factors in malleable prosthesis selection. Penile prosthesis were extracted in 3 patients (2.82%) because of complication.

Özet

Penil protez implantasyonu erektil disfonksiyon tedavisinde en etkili ve popüler bir yöntemdir. Kliniğimizde 1990-1999 yıllan arasında yaşları 24-65 arasında değişen (ortalama 54) çeşitli nedenlere bağlı erektil disfonksiyon tanısı alan 106 hastaya bükülebilir tip penil protez uygulanmıştır, 1 hastada (%0.94) üretral rüptür, 1 hastada (%0.94) glans erezyonu, 3 hastada (%2.82) flask glans görüldü, 1 hastaya corporal fibrozis nedeniyle protez takılamadı. 2 hastada (%1.88) postoperatif enfeksiyon gelişti 3 hastada (%2.82) meydana gelen komplikasyonlar nedeniyle protez çıkartıldı. Hastalar tarafından kolay kullanımı, düşük ekonomik maliyeti, mekanik problemlerin olmaması nedeniyle bükülebilir protezler tercih edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNLÜSOY, B., SÜELÖZGEN, T., TUNA, A., MİNARECİ, S., AYDER, A. R. (2001). Malleable penile prosthesis implantation in the treatment of impotence. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 70–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/328869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anafarta K, Göğüs O, Bedük Y, Arıkan N: Er-kek Cinsel İşlev Bozuklukları: Temel Üroloji, 1045-1084, 1998
  2. Evans C: The use of penile prosthesis in the tre-atment of impotence. Brit. J. of Urol. 81: 591-598, 1998
  3. Altay B, Kefi A, Apaydın E ve ark: Penil protez deneyimlerimiz. Türk Üroloji Dergisi. Cilt: 25, 405-413, 1999
  4. Küpeli S, Aydos K, Budak M: Penile Implants in Erectile Impotence. Eur. Urol. 36: 129-135, 1999
  5. Jarow PJ: Risk factors for penile prosthetic in-fection. J. Urol. 156, 402-404, 1996
  6. Carson CC and Robertson CN: Late hematoge-nous infection of penile prosthesis. J. Urol. 139: 50, 1988
  7. Thomella JU, Thompson JT, Rowland RG and Mulcahy JJ: Infections complications of penile prosthetic implants. J. Urol. 138: 65, 1987
  8. Qvesade ET and Light JK: The AMS 700 infla-table penile prosthesis: Long-term experience with the controlled expension cylindres. J. Urol. 149: 46, 1993
  9. Wilson SK and Delk JR: Inflatable penile imp-lant infection: Predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J. Urol., 153: 63, 1995
  10. Maclean DJ, Mesih BK: Gangrene of the penis as a complication of penile prosthesis. J. Urol. 133: 862-3, 1985
  11. Carbone JD, Daitch AJ, Angermeier WK and et al: Management of severe corporeal fibrozis with implantation of prosthesis via a transverse scrotal approach. J. Urol. 159: 125-127, 1998
  12. Knoll CD, Funlow WL, Benson RC and et al: Management of non dilatable cavernous fibrozis with the use of a downsped inflatable penile prosthesis. J. Urol. 153: 366, 1995.