Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2003 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Early catheter removal at 8th postoperative day by using ureteral catheters in radical retropubic prostatectomy

Radikal retropubik prostatektomide bilateral üreteral kateterizasyon ile postoperatif 8. günde sonda alımı

Pages
264–267
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ureter catheters that were placed in operation prevent urinary leakage and pressure and provide confident anostomosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of our study was to provide early catheter removal at 8th day after surgery by using introperative bilateral ureteral stents in each ureter.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: In between 1996-2001, radical retropubic prostatectomy was done to 74 patients for localized prostate cancer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ureter catheters that were placed in operation prevent urinary leakage and pressure and provide confident anostomosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Prostatektomi · Kateterizasyon · Prostat neoplazmları

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to provide early catheter removal at 8th day after surgery by using introperative bilateral ureteral stents in each ureter. Material and Methods: In between 1996-2001, radical retropubic prostatectomy was done to 74 patients for localized prostate cancer. Urethral catheters were removed at 8th day after the operation in 34 of 74 patients. Mean age value was 61 (range between 47 and 74). Mean follow-up time was 14 months (6-22 months). All patients were staged according to TNM system with digital rectal examination, PSA, TRUS guided biopsy and Gleason scoring. In the operation, after prostate, seminal vasiculos and lymph nodes were excised, ureteral orifices were pointed in bladder. 90 cm 6 Fr ureteral catheters were placed and taken out from urethra. After 20 F Foley urethral catheter was placed, anostomosis sutures were tied. At seventh day after surgery ureteral catheters were withdrawn and urethral catheter was removed at eight day. Cystrography was done to observe urinary extravasation. Results: There was no urinary leakage in 32 of 34 (%94.12) patients. Urethral catheter was replaced in 2 patients and removed at 14th day with extravasation. Complications such as urinary retantion, urinoma or pelvic abscess were not seen due to early catheter removal. Wound infection in 2 patients treated with medical care. Patients were followed at 3 months intervals. 5 patients had transient stress incontinence lasting between 3 and 6 month. All patients were continent at 6th month. Maximum flow rate was 14 ml/sec in uroflowmetric examination. Anostomosis stricture was seen in 2 patients (%5.3). Soft dilation and transurethral resection were done to strictures. Conclusion: Early catheter removal is both possible and confident after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Early removal of urethral catheter did not lead any added complications. Ureter catheters that were placed in operation prevent urinary leakage and pressure and provide confident anostomosis.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı radikal retropubik prostatektomide, operasyon esnasında her iki üretere kateter yerleştirerek operasyondan 8 gün sonra üretral kateter alımını sağlamaktır. Kliniğimizde 1996-2001 yılları arasında lokalize prostat kanseri mevcut toplam 74 hastaya radikal retropubik prostatektomi yapıldı. 74 hastanın 34'ünde üretral kateter cerrahi sonrası 8. günde alındı. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 61 (47-74) idi. Hastalar ortalama 14 ay (6-22 ay) izlendi. Tüm hastalar operasyon öncesi parmakla rektal muayene, PSA, TRUS eşliğinde biyopsi, Gleason skoru sonuçlan ile TNM sistemine göre evrelendirildi. Operasyonda prostat, vesikula seminalis ve lenf nodları çıkarıldıktan sonra üreler orifisleri mesane içinde belirlendi. 90 cm uzunluğunda 6 Fr. üreteral kateter takılarak üretradan çıkarıldı. 20 F Foley üretral kateter yerleştirilerek anostomoz dikişleri kondu. Postoperatif 7.günde üreteral kateterler alındı ve 8.günde üretral kateter çekildi. İdrar kaçağını gözlemek için sistografi yapıldı. 34 hastanın 32'sinde (%94.12) sistografi'de anostomoz kaçağı gözlenmedi. İdrar kaçağı görülen 2 hastada üretral kateter tekrar yerleştirilerek 14.günde alındı. Kateterin erken alımına bağlı üriner retansiyon, ürinoma veya pelvik abse gibi herhangi bir komplikasyon görülmedi. 2 hastada yara enfeksiyonu mevcuttu ve yara bakımı ile tedavi edildi. Hastalar 3'er aylık periyodlarla kontrol edildi. 5 hastada 3-6 ay süren geçici inkontinans gözlendi. 6 ay sonunda tüm hastalar kontinandı. Uroflowmetrik incelemede maksimum akım hızı ortalama 14 ml/sn idi. 2 hastada (%5.3) anostomoz darlığı görüldü. Darlık gözlenen hastalara yumuşak dilatasyon ve transüretral rezeksiyon uygulandı. Radikal retropubik prostatektomi sonrası erken kateter alımı mümkün ve güvenilirdir. Erken kateter alımı ek bir komplikasyona neden olmamaktadır. Yerleşlirilen üreler kateterleri idrar sızıntısını ve basıncı önlemekte ve güvenilir bir anostomoz sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MİNARECİ, S., GÜNLÜSOY, B., NERGİZ, N., TUNA, A., ÇİÇEK, S., AYDER, A. R. (2003). Early catheter removal at 8th postoperative day by using ureteral catheters in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 264–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/328522

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Dalton PD, Schaffer JA, Garret EJ and Grayheck TJ: Radiographic assessment of the vesico urethral anastomosis directing early decatheterization following nevre-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 141: 79-81, 1989 2- Lepor H, Nieder AM and Fraimen MC: Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is feasible and desimble. Urology 58: 425-429, 2001 3- Coogan CC, Little JJ, Bihnle R et al: Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy. Urology 49: 400-403, 1997 4- Santis FW, Hoffman AM and Dewolf CW: Early catheter removal in 100 consecutive patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU International 85: 1067-1068, 2000 5- Little S, Bihrle R and Foster RS: Early urethral catheter removal following radical prostatectomy. Urology 46: 429-431, 1995 6- Sauto CA, Telohan C, Souto JC et al: Experience with early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 163: 865-866, 2000 7- Sunya VB, Pnovat J, Jhansen Karl-Eric and Brown J: Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy, Risk factors and menagment. J Urol. 143: 755-758, 1990 8- Lang PH and Reddy PK: Technical nuance and surgical results of radical retropubic prostatectomy in 150 patients. J Urol 348-352, 1987 9- Nicholas RT, Barry JM and Hodges CV: The morbidity of radical prostatectomy for multifocal stage 1 prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 117: 83, 1977 10- Bass RB and Barrett DM: Radical retropubic prostatectomy after transurethral prostatic resection. J Urol 124: 495, 1980 11- Walsh PC: Anastomotic radical retropubic prostatectomy; in Walsh PC, Retic AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ (eds): Cambell’s Urology, 7th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co. Vol 3: 2565-2588, 1998