Journals / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2007 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Retroperitonoscopic partial nephrectomy: the first experience

Retroperitoneal laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi: ilk tecrübemiz

Pages
110–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides small surgical explosure, retroperitonoscopic partial nephrectomy may be an alternative technique in selected patients regarding tumor size and location.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The first case of our clinic who underwent retroperitonoscopic partial nephrectomy due to small, solitary lower pole renal tumor was presented by regarding current literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Vascular control was ensured by Satinsky clamp which was applied with additional 12 mm trocar placed in 5 cm anteriorly from the camera trocar.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides small surgical explosure, retroperitonoscopic partial nephrectomy may be an alternative technique in selected patients regarding tumor size and location.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Orta yaşlı · Kadın · Böbrek neoplazmları

Abstract

Introduction: The first case of our clinic who underwent retroperitonoscopic partial nephrectomy due to small, solitary lower pole renal tumor was presented by regarding current literature. Materials and Methods: Vascular control was ensured by Satinsky clamp which was applied with additional 12 mm trocar placed in 5 cm anteriorly from the camera trocar. Fibrin sealant was performed in tumor bed for bleeding control. Two interrupted 2.0 vicryl sutures are placed over a pre-prepared Surgicel bolster (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) that has been positioned over the cut surface of the kidney. Results: In our first retroperitonoscopic experience, surgical time was 187 minutes, clamping time was 22 minutes. Intraoperative bleeding was 125 ml. Postoperative 2nd day retroperitoneal drain was pulled out and the patient discharged in 3rd postoperative day. Conclusion: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy become feasible surgical procedure owing to advances in intracorporeal stich and renal hypothermia techniques. However, long term oncologic results are not clear. Besides small surgical explosure, retroperitonoscopic partial nephrectomy may be an alternative technique in selected patients regarding tumor size and location.

Özet

Bu makalede, alt pol yerleşimli 3 cm’den küçük soliter böbrek tümörü nedeniyle retroperitoneal laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi uyguladığımız ilk olgumuz, ilgili yayınlar eşliğinde sunulmuştur. Vasküler kontrol, kamera portunun ~5 cm önünden yerleştirilen 12 mm’lik trokar ile Satinsky klemp kullanılarak sağlandı. Kanama kontrolü için önce fibrin doku yapıştırıcısı tümör yatağına uygulandı ve Surgicel (Johnson&Johnson, New Burnswick, New Jersey) tümör yatağına 2 adet 2.0 vicryl ile intrakorporyal sütüre edilerek parankim defekti kapatıldı ve hemostaz sağlandı. İlk retroperitoneal laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi tecrübemizde, böbrek arteri klemplendikten sonraki sıcak iskemi süresi 22 dakika, toplam ameliyat süresi 187 dakikaydı. Ameliyat sırasında kanama yaklaşık 125 mililitreydi. Ameliyat sonrası 2. gün hastanın dreni çekildi ve 3. gün taburcu edildi. LPN, intrakorporyal sütür ve böbrek hipotermisi tekniklerinin geliştirilmesi ile daha uygulanabilir bir cerrahi yöntem haline gelmiştir. Ancak uzun dönem onkolojik sonuçları halen bilinmemektedir. RLPN ise, küçük cerrahi çalışma sahası dışında tümör boyutu ve yerleşimi göz önüne alınarak seçilen olgularda tercih edilebilecek bir cerrahi yöntemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖZEN, S., KÜPELİ, B., ACAR, C., ŞEN, İ., BOZKIRLI, İ. (2007). Retroperitonoscopic partial nephrectomy: the first experience. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 110–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/328738

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Chow WH, Devesa SS, Warren JL, et al: Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA. 281: 1628-1631, 1999
  2. Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Belldegrun AS: The chancing history of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 166: 1611-1623, 2001
  3. Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, et al: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol. 7: 521-526, 1993
  4. Gill I, Delworth MG, Munch LC: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 152: 1539, 1994
  5. Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC: Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10 year follow-up. J Urol. 163: 442-445, 2000
  6. Gill IS, Martin SF, Desai MM, et al: Comparative analysis of laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol; 170: 64-68, 2003
  7. Ng CS, Gill IS, Ramani AP, et al: Transperitoneal vs Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol; 174: 846- 849, 2005
  8. Wright JL, Porter JR: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Urol; 174: 841-845, 2005
  9. Johnston WK, Montgomery JS, Seifman BD, et al: Fibrin glue v sutured bolster: Lessons learned during 100 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies. J Urol. 174, 47-52, 2005
  10. Gill IS, Ramani AP, Spaliviero M, et al: Improved hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using gelatin matrix thrombin sealant. Urology; 65: 463-466, 2005.